Loading…

Examination of Relationships Among Trait-Like Individual Differences, State-Like Individual Differences, and Learning Performance

Several authors (e.g., J. T. Austin & H. J. Klein, 1996 ; R. Kanfer, 1990b , 1992 ) have urged researchers to examine comprehensive models of distal individual differences as predictors of proximal motivational processes and performance. Two field studies in an academic setting tested a model of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied psychology 2000-12, Vol.85 (6), p.835-847
Main Authors: Chen, Gilad, Gully, Stanley M, Whiteman, Jon-Andrew, Kilcullen, Robert N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Several authors (e.g., J. T. Austin & H. J. Klein, 1996 ; R. Kanfer, 1990b , 1992 ) have urged researchers to examine comprehensive models of distal individual differences as predictors of proximal motivational processes and performance. Two field studies in an academic setting tested a model of relationships among trait-like individual differences (cognitive ability, general self-efficacy, and goal orientation), state-like individual differences (state anxiety, task-specific self-efficacy, and goals), and learning performance. Most hypothesized relationships among these constructs received support when tested on 2 samples, when examining different performance episodes, and when using different goal orientation and state-anxiety measures. In general, state-like individual differences were found to mediate the relationships between trait-like individual differences and learning performance. Implications of these results are discussed and suggestions for future research are provided.
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.835