Loading…

A New CAPD Battery--Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment: Factor Analysis and Comparisons with SCAN

Based on recommendations by Musiek & Chermak (1994, American Journal of Audiology, 3, 23-27) and ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54), a battery of four commonly used tests was selected and recorded for use in assessing school children. These tests were labeled the Multiple Au...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of audiology 2000-12, Vol.9 (2), p.101-111
Main Authors: Domitz, Deborah M, Schow, Ronald L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-d0350fe0fbd017754776bda470a78faaa38e70aff61d9985287c7682b4b6c5a73
container_end_page 111
container_issue 2
container_start_page 101
container_title American journal of audiology
container_volume 9
creator Domitz, Deborah M
Schow, Ronald L
description Based on recommendations by Musiek & Chermak (1994, American Journal of Audiology, 3, 23-27) and ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54), a battery of four commonly used tests was selected and recorded for use in assessing school children. These tests were labeled the Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment (MAPA) and then administered to an initial sample of 81 third grade children, along with the SCAN screening test for auditory processing disorders. Afterward, several exploratory factor analyses were performed on the findings, and comparisons were made between the results for the MAPA and SCAN. Four separate factors emerged from the four MAPA tests, which were linked closely to the components of central auditory processing disorders (CAPDs) defined by ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54). These factors were labeled monaural separation/closure (MSC), auditory pattern/temporal ordering, binaural integration, and binaural separation (BS). SCAN appears to measure two of these factors, MSC and BS. Use of MAPA is encouraging. Our findings suggest it may provide an appropriate multiple-test, CAPD battery for third grade children, and it meets at least some of the objectives described in the consensus document proposed by ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54).
doi_str_mv 10.1044/1059-0889(2000/012)
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72529998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72529998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-d0350fe0fbd017754776bda470a78faaa38e70aff61d9985287c7682b4b6c5a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtO5DAQRS0EGl7zBUjIKzQsQtt52WYXMjxG6gGkGdaWk1Q6RnnhStTqv8etbsSqrlTn3sUh5IKzG87ieMFZogImpfoVMsYWjIfXB-SEJ4kMFI_Eoc9fxDE5RXxnHlEy_EGOOfcVLtMTUmf0GdY0z15_0zszTeA2QfB3bic7tkCzubLT4Db01Q0lINp-RTNEnzrop1v6YEr_pllv2g1apKavaD50o3EWhx7p2k4N_Zdnz-fkqDYtws_9PSNvD_f_86dg-fL4J8-WQcmVmoKKRQmrgdVFxbgQSSxEWlQmFswIWRtjIgk-13XKK6VkEkpRilSGRVykZWJEdEaudrujGz5mwEl3FktoW9PDMKMWYRIq3_RguANLNyA6qPXobGfcRnOmt3r1Vp7eytNbvdq786XL_fpcdFB9V_Y6PXC9Axq7atbWgcYRoGwa8Eb6lTbvRvs9v82jTxfYg0o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72529998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A New CAPD Battery--Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment: Factor Analysis and Comparisons with SCAN</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Domitz, Deborah M ; Schow, Ronald L</creator><creatorcontrib>Domitz, Deborah M ; Schow, Ronald L</creatorcontrib><description>Based on recommendations by Musiek &amp; Chermak (1994, American Journal of Audiology, 3, 23-27) and ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54), a battery of four commonly used tests was selected and recorded for use in assessing school children. These tests were labeled the Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment (MAPA) and then administered to an initial sample of 81 third grade children, along with the SCAN screening test for auditory processing disorders. Afterward, several exploratory factor analyses were performed on the findings, and comparisons were made between the results for the MAPA and SCAN. Four separate factors emerged from the four MAPA tests, which were linked closely to the components of central auditory processing disorders (CAPDs) defined by ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54). These factors were labeled monaural separation/closure (MSC), auditory pattern/temporal ordering, binaural integration, and binaural separation (BS). SCAN appears to measure two of these factors, MSC and BS. Use of MAPA is encouraging. Our findings suggest it may provide an appropriate multiple-test, CAPD battery for third grade children, and it meets at least some of the objectives described in the consensus document proposed by ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2000/012)</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11200186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: ASHA</publisher><subject>Auditory Perceptual Disorders - diagnosis ; Child ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Reproducibility of Results ; Speech Discrimination Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>American journal of audiology, 2000-12, Vol.9 (2), p.101-111</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-d0350fe0fbd017754776bda470a78faaa38e70aff61d9985287c7682b4b6c5a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33612,33878,33912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11200186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Domitz, Deborah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schow, Ronald L</creatorcontrib><title>A New CAPD Battery--Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment: Factor Analysis and Comparisons with SCAN</title><title>American journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Am J Audiol</addtitle><description>Based on recommendations by Musiek &amp; Chermak (1994, American Journal of Audiology, 3, 23-27) and ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54), a battery of four commonly used tests was selected and recorded for use in assessing school children. These tests were labeled the Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment (MAPA) and then administered to an initial sample of 81 third grade children, along with the SCAN screening test for auditory processing disorders. Afterward, several exploratory factor analyses were performed on the findings, and comparisons were made between the results for the MAPA and SCAN. Four separate factors emerged from the four MAPA tests, which were linked closely to the components of central auditory processing disorders (CAPDs) defined by ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54). These factors were labeled monaural separation/closure (MSC), auditory pattern/temporal ordering, binaural integration, and binaural separation (BS). SCAN appears to measure two of these factors, MSC and BS. Use of MAPA is encouraging. Our findings suggest it may provide an appropriate multiple-test, CAPD battery for third grade children, and it meets at least some of the objectives described in the consensus document proposed by ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54).</description><subject>Auditory Perceptual Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Speech Discrimination Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>1059-0889</issn><issn>1558-9137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMtO5DAQRS0EGl7zBUjIKzQsQtt52WYXMjxG6gGkGdaWk1Q6RnnhStTqv8etbsSqrlTn3sUh5IKzG87ieMFZogImpfoVMsYWjIfXB-SEJ4kMFI_Eoc9fxDE5RXxnHlEy_EGOOfcVLtMTUmf0GdY0z15_0zszTeA2QfB3bic7tkCzubLT4Db01Q0lINp-RTNEnzrop1v6YEr_pllv2g1apKavaD50o3EWhx7p2k4N_Zdnz-fkqDYtws_9PSNvD_f_86dg-fL4J8-WQcmVmoKKRQmrgdVFxbgQSSxEWlQmFswIWRtjIgk-13XKK6VkEkpRilSGRVykZWJEdEaudrujGz5mwEl3FktoW9PDMKMWYRIq3_RguANLNyA6qPXobGfcRnOmt3r1Vp7eytNbvdq786XL_fpcdFB9V_Y6PXC9Axq7atbWgcYRoGwa8Eb6lTbvRvs9v82jTxfYg0o</recordid><startdate>200012</startdate><enddate>200012</enddate><creator>Domitz, Deborah M</creator><creator>Schow, Ronald L</creator><general>ASHA</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200012</creationdate><title>A New CAPD Battery--Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment: Factor Analysis and Comparisons with SCAN</title><author>Domitz, Deborah M ; Schow, Ronald L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-d0350fe0fbd017754776bda470a78faaa38e70aff61d9985287c7682b4b6c5a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Auditory Perceptual Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Speech Discrimination Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Domitz, Deborah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schow, Ronald L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Domitz, Deborah M</au><au>Schow, Ronald L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A New CAPD Battery--Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment: Factor Analysis and Comparisons with SCAN</atitle><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Audiol</addtitle><date>2000-12</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>101-111</pages><issn>1059-0889</issn><eissn>1558-9137</eissn><abstract>Based on recommendations by Musiek &amp; Chermak (1994, American Journal of Audiology, 3, 23-27) and ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54), a battery of four commonly used tests was selected and recorded for use in assessing school children. These tests were labeled the Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment (MAPA) and then administered to an initial sample of 81 third grade children, along with the SCAN screening test for auditory processing disorders. Afterward, several exploratory factor analyses were performed on the findings, and comparisons were made between the results for the MAPA and SCAN. Four separate factors emerged from the four MAPA tests, which were linked closely to the components of central auditory processing disorders (CAPDs) defined by ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54). These factors were labeled monaural separation/closure (MSC), auditory pattern/temporal ordering, binaural integration, and binaural separation (BS). SCAN appears to measure two of these factors, MSC and BS. Use of MAPA is encouraging. Our findings suggest it may provide an appropriate multiple-test, CAPD battery for third grade children, and it meets at least some of the objectives described in the consensus document proposed by ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>ASHA</pub><pmid>11200186</pmid><doi>10.1044/1059-0889(2000/012)</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-0889
ispartof American journal of audiology, 2000-12, Vol.9 (2), p.101-111
issn 1059-0889
1558-9137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72529998
source Social Science Premium Collection; Linguistics Collection; Education Collection
subjects Auditory Perceptual Disorders - diagnosis
Child
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Reproducibility of Results
Speech Discrimination Tests - statistics & numerical data
title A New CAPD Battery--Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment: Factor Analysis and Comparisons with SCAN
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A19%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20New%20CAPD%20Battery--Multiple%20Auditory%20Processing%20Assessment:%20Factor%20Analysis%20and%20Comparisons%20with%20SCAN&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Domitz,%20Deborah%20M&rft.date=2000-12&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=101-111&rft.issn=1059-0889&rft.eissn=1558-9137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/1059-0889(2000/012)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72529998%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-d0350fe0fbd017754776bda470a78faaa38e70aff61d9985287c7682b4b6c5a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72529998&rft_id=info:pmid/11200186&rfr_iscdi=true