Loading…

Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study

Katebzadeh N, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study. International Endodontic Journal, 33, 60–65, 2000. Aim  To radiographically compare periapical repair of roots with infected root canals obturated in one‐ste...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International endodontic journal 2000-01, Vol.33 (1), p.60-65
Main Authors: Katebzadeh, N., Sigurdsson, A., Trope, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4971-7f3b66ebb8b3a3b01ac160aac17da1aae7f271f9c76af90c3941232bba7b99963
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4971-7f3b66ebb8b3a3b01ac160aac17da1aae7f271f9c76af90c3941232bba7b99963
container_end_page 65
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title International endodontic journal
container_volume 33
creator Katebzadeh, N.
Sigurdsson, A.
Trope, M.
description Katebzadeh N, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study. International Endodontic Journal, 33, 60–65, 2000. Aim  To radiographically compare periapical repair of roots with infected root canals obturated in one‐step or with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) intracanal medication in two steps. Methodology Standardized preoperative periapical radiographs were taken of 72 roots of vital dogs' teeth. All roots were then aseptically instrumented to ISO size 45. As negative controls, 12 roots were aseptically obturated. The remaining roots were infected with dental plaque and closed. Six weeks later, apical periodontitis was radiographically confirmed in the infected roots. The roots were divided into the following groups: group 1, one‐step (n=24); roots were irrigated with 10 cc saline, obturated, and permanently restored. Group 2, Ca(OH)2 (n=24); roots were treated as in group 1, except that after saline irrigation Ca(OH)2 medicament was placed in the canal 1 week before obturation. Group 3, positive control (n=12); the roots were irrigated with saline, access permanently closed but canals not obturated. Group 4, negative control (n=12); previously aseptically obturated roots were permanently restored. After 6 months, standardized postoperative radiographs were obtained. Three independent evaluators blinded to the treatment groups evaluated the preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The evaluators were instructed to rate each root, based on changes on the radiographs, as failed, improved or healed. Results  Radiographically, the percentage of cases that completely healed were similar for the one‐step and Ca(OH)2 groups (35.3% vs. 36.8%). However, the Ca(OH)2 group had fewer failed cases (15.8% vs. 41.2%) and more improved cases (47.4% vs. 23.5%) than the one‐step group. Conclusion  Power statistics demonstrated that at 43 cases per group, Ca(OH)2 treatment would be statistically superior to one‐step treatment. We consider this number to be clinically important.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00301.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72592964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72592964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4971-7f3b66ebb8b3a3b01ac160aac17da1aae7f271f9c76af90c3941232bba7b99963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNFu2yAUhlG1qc3avsLE1e7sgbEhTLuZqjZtVW3StKmX6IChIXOMB3aavP3IEmW3uzkc6f_-g_QhhCkpKan5x1VJGW-KqpG0rAghJSGM0HJ7hman4A2aEVqzoprPmwv0LqVVBhvC6Dm6oJQRUYtmhpbfofXhJcKw9AbbDXQTjD70ODg82Ohh8AY6vLTQ-f4FgxttxEGPUzxhvnfWjLbFMYQRG-ihS58w9DnAG78JOI1Tu7tCb10O7PXxvUQ_725_3NwXT98WDzdfngpTS0EL4Zjm3Go91wyYJhQM5QTyFC1QACtcJaiTRnBwkhgma1qxSmsQWkrJ2SX6cLg7xPB7smlUa5-M7TrobZiSEtlNJXmdwfkBNDGkFK1TQ_RriDtFidpbViu1l6n2MtXesvprWW1z9f3xj0mvbfuveNSagc8H4NV3dvffh9XD7WNecr041H0a7fZUh_hLccFEo56_LtTi-f7usWmkIuwPyVmbjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72592964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Katebzadeh, N. ; Sigurdsson, A. ; Trope, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Katebzadeh, N. ; Sigurdsson, A. ; Trope, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Katebzadeh N, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study. International Endodontic Journal, 33, 60–65, 2000. Aim  To radiographically compare periapical repair of roots with infected root canals obturated in one‐step or with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) intracanal medication in two steps. Methodology Standardized preoperative periapical radiographs were taken of 72 roots of vital dogs' teeth. All roots were then aseptically instrumented to ISO size 45. As negative controls, 12 roots were aseptically obturated. The remaining roots were infected with dental plaque and closed. Six weeks later, apical periodontitis was radiographically confirmed in the infected roots. The roots were divided into the following groups: group 1, one‐step (n=24); roots were irrigated with 10 cc saline, obturated, and permanently restored. Group 2, Ca(OH)2 (n=24); roots were treated as in group 1, except that after saline irrigation Ca(OH)2 medicament was placed in the canal 1 week before obturation. Group 3, positive control (n=12); the roots were irrigated with saline, access permanently closed but canals not obturated. Group 4, negative control (n=12); previously aseptically obturated roots were permanently restored. After 6 months, standardized postoperative radiographs were obtained. Three independent evaluators blinded to the treatment groups evaluated the preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The evaluators were instructed to rate each root, based on changes on the radiographs, as failed, improved or healed. Results  Radiographically, the percentage of cases that completely healed were similar for the one‐step and Ca(OH)2 groups (35.3% vs. 36.8%). However, the Ca(OH)2 group had fewer failed cases (15.8% vs. 41.2%) and more improved cases (47.4% vs. 23.5%) than the one‐step group. Conclusion  Power statistics demonstrated that at 43 cases per group, Ca(OH)2 treatment would be statistically superior to one‐step treatment. We consider this number to be clinically important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00301.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11307475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Calcium Hydroxide - therapeutic use ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Dental Plaque - microbiology ; Dental Pulp Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Dental Pulp Diseases - microbiology ; Dental Pulp Diseases - therapy ; Dentistry ; Dogs ; Follow-Up Studies ; healing ; Methylmethacrylates - therapeutic use ; Observer Variation ; periapical ; Periapical Periodontitis - diagnostic imaging ; Periapical Periodontitis - therapy ; Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging ; Periapical Tissue - physiopathology ; Radiography ; Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use ; Root Canal Irrigants - therapeutic use ; Root Canal Obturation ; Single-Blind Method ; Statistics as Topic ; teeth ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Healing ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2000-01, Vol.33 (1), p.60-65</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4971-7f3b66ebb8b3a3b01ac160aac17da1aae7f271f9c76af90c3941232bba7b99963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4971-7f3b66ebb8b3a3b01ac160aac17da1aae7f271f9c76af90c3941232bba7b99963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11307475$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Katebzadeh, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigurdsson, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trope, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description>Katebzadeh N, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study. International Endodontic Journal, 33, 60–65, 2000. Aim  To radiographically compare periapical repair of roots with infected root canals obturated in one‐step or with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) intracanal medication in two steps. Methodology Standardized preoperative periapical radiographs were taken of 72 roots of vital dogs' teeth. All roots were then aseptically instrumented to ISO size 45. As negative controls, 12 roots were aseptically obturated. The remaining roots were infected with dental plaque and closed. Six weeks later, apical periodontitis was radiographically confirmed in the infected roots. The roots were divided into the following groups: group 1, one‐step (n=24); roots were irrigated with 10 cc saline, obturated, and permanently restored. Group 2, Ca(OH)2 (n=24); roots were treated as in group 1, except that after saline irrigation Ca(OH)2 medicament was placed in the canal 1 week before obturation. Group 3, positive control (n=12); the roots were irrigated with saline, access permanently closed but canals not obturated. Group 4, negative control (n=12); previously aseptically obturated roots were permanently restored. After 6 months, standardized postoperative radiographs were obtained. Three independent evaluators blinded to the treatment groups evaluated the preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The evaluators were instructed to rate each root, based on changes on the radiographs, as failed, improved or healed. Results  Radiographically, the percentage of cases that completely healed were similar for the one‐step and Ca(OH)2 groups (35.3% vs. 36.8%). However, the Ca(OH)2 group had fewer failed cases (15.8% vs. 41.2%) and more improved cases (47.4% vs. 23.5%) than the one‐step group. Conclusion  Power statistics demonstrated that at 43 cases per group, Ca(OH)2 treatment would be statistically superior to one‐step treatment. We consider this number to be clinically important.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Calcium Hydroxide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Dental Plaque - microbiology</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>healing</subject><subject>Methylmethacrylates - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>periapical</subject><subject>Periapical Periodontitis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Periapical Periodontitis - therapy</subject><subject>Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Periapical Tissue - physiopathology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Root Canal Irrigants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Root Canal Obturation</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>teeth</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><subject>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkNFu2yAUhlG1qc3avsLE1e7sgbEhTLuZqjZtVW3StKmX6IChIXOMB3aavP3IEmW3uzkc6f_-g_QhhCkpKan5x1VJGW-KqpG0rAghJSGM0HJ7hman4A2aEVqzoprPmwv0LqVVBhvC6Dm6oJQRUYtmhpbfofXhJcKw9AbbDXQTjD70ODg82Ohh8AY6vLTQ-f4FgxttxEGPUzxhvnfWjLbFMYQRG-ihS58w9DnAG78JOI1Tu7tCb10O7PXxvUQ_725_3NwXT98WDzdfngpTS0EL4Zjm3Go91wyYJhQM5QTyFC1QACtcJaiTRnBwkhgma1qxSmsQWkrJ2SX6cLg7xPB7smlUa5-M7TrobZiSEtlNJXmdwfkBNDGkFK1TQ_RriDtFidpbViu1l6n2MtXesvprWW1z9f3xj0mvbfuveNSagc8H4NV3dvffh9XD7WNecr041H0a7fZUh_hLccFEo56_LtTi-f7usWmkIuwPyVmbjA</recordid><startdate>200001</startdate><enddate>200001</enddate><creator>Katebzadeh, N.</creator><creator>Sigurdsson, A.</creator><creator>Trope, M.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200001</creationdate><title>Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study</title><author>Katebzadeh, N. ; Sigurdsson, A. ; Trope, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4971-7f3b66ebb8b3a3b01ac160aac17da1aae7f271f9c76af90c3941232bba7b99963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Calcium Hydroxide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Dental Plaque - microbiology</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>healing</topic><topic>Methylmethacrylates - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>periapical</topic><topic>Periapical Periodontitis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Periapical Periodontitis - therapy</topic><topic>Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Periapical Tissue - physiopathology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Root Canal Irrigants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Root Canal Obturation</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>teeth</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><topic>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Katebzadeh, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigurdsson, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trope, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Katebzadeh, N.</au><au>Sigurdsson, A.</au><au>Trope, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2000-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>60-65</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract>Katebzadeh N, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study. International Endodontic Journal, 33, 60–65, 2000. Aim  To radiographically compare periapical repair of roots with infected root canals obturated in one‐step or with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) intracanal medication in two steps. Methodology Standardized preoperative periapical radiographs were taken of 72 roots of vital dogs' teeth. All roots were then aseptically instrumented to ISO size 45. As negative controls, 12 roots were aseptically obturated. The remaining roots were infected with dental plaque and closed. Six weeks later, apical periodontitis was radiographically confirmed in the infected roots. The roots were divided into the following groups: group 1, one‐step (n=24); roots were irrigated with 10 cc saline, obturated, and permanently restored. Group 2, Ca(OH)2 (n=24); roots were treated as in group 1, except that after saline irrigation Ca(OH)2 medicament was placed in the canal 1 week before obturation. Group 3, positive control (n=12); the roots were irrigated with saline, access permanently closed but canals not obturated. Group 4, negative control (n=12); previously aseptically obturated roots were permanently restored. After 6 months, standardized postoperative radiographs were obtained. Three independent evaluators blinded to the treatment groups evaluated the preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The evaluators were instructed to rate each root, based on changes on the radiographs, as failed, improved or healed. Results  Radiographically, the percentage of cases that completely healed were similar for the one‐step and Ca(OH)2 groups (35.3% vs. 36.8%). However, the Ca(OH)2 group had fewer failed cases (15.8% vs. 41.2%) and more improved cases (47.4% vs. 23.5%) than the one‐step group. Conclusion  Power statistics demonstrated that at 43 cases per group, Ca(OH)2 treatment would be statistically superior to one‐step treatment. We consider this number to be clinically important.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>11307475</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00301.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-2885
ispartof International endodontic journal, 2000-01, Vol.33 (1), p.60-65
issn 0143-2885
1365-2591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72592964
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects Animals
Calcium Hydroxide - therapeutic use
Chi-Square Distribution
Dental Plaque - microbiology
Dental Pulp Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Dental Pulp Diseases - microbiology
Dental Pulp Diseases - therapy
Dentistry
Dogs
Follow-Up Studies
healing
Methylmethacrylates - therapeutic use
Observer Variation
periapical
Periapical Periodontitis - diagnostic imaging
Periapical Periodontitis - therapy
Periapical Tissue - diagnostic imaging
Periapical Tissue - physiopathology
Radiography
Root Canal Filling Materials - therapeutic use
Root Canal Irrigants - therapeutic use
Root Canal Obturation
Single-Blind Method
Statistics as Topic
teeth
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing
Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use
title Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A09%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiographic%20evaluation%20of%20periapical%20healing%20after%20obturation%20of%20infected%20root%20canals:%20an%20in%20vivo%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Katebzadeh,%20N.&rft.date=2000-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=60-65&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00301.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72592964%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4971-7f3b66ebb8b3a3b01ac160aac17da1aae7f271f9c76af90c3941232bba7b99963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72592964&rft_id=info:pmid/11307475&rfr_iscdi=true