Clinical advantages of dual activity in urticaria

• Published in: Allergy (Copenhagen) 2000-01, Vol.55 (s64), p.28-33
• Main Author: Kontou‐Fili, K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acute Disease; Anti-Allergic Agents - immunology; Anti-Allergic Agents - pharmacology; Anti-Allergic Agents - therapeutic use; anti‐5‐lipoxygenase; Benzimidazoles - immunology; Benzimidazoles - pharmacology; Benzimidazoles - therapeutic use; Chronic Disease; chronic urticaria; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cold Temperature - adverse effects; cold‐induced urticaria; H1 antagonist; Histamine - immunology; Histamine H1 Antagonists - immunology; Histamine H1 Antagonists - pharmacology; Histamine H1 Antagonists - therapeutic use; Humans; Leukotrienes - immunology; Lipoxygenase Inhibitors; mizolastine; Urticaria - drug therapy; Urticaria - immunology
• ISSN: 0105-4538; 1398-9995
• DOI: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00804.x

Urticaria is a common disorder that adversely affects quality of life; work‐related and recreational activities are restricted, while rest, sleep, and emotions are seriously disturbed in a significant proportion of patients. The pathogenic mechanisms vary, but cutaneous mast‐cell activation with release of histamine and other vasoactive or proinflammatory mediators is thought to be the final common pathway for lesion induction in most cases. A subsequent, but incompletely understood, late‐phase allergic reaction seems to prolong the inflammatory process, particularly in certain chronic forms of the disorder. Although histamine is considered an important mediator of urticaria, additional substances, including the cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTs), are putative mediators of the immediate urticarial responses and the inflammatory events that follow in some types of urticaria. A second‐generation antihistamine, mizolastine, which exhibits dual activity with selective H1‐receptor antagonism and, as shown in animal studies, anti‐5‐lipoxygenase activity, represents an advance in the treatment of urticaria. It has rapid, potent and sustained action. At the recommended 10‐mg dose, mizolastine suppresses the histamine‐induced wheal reaction as early as 1 h after oral administration. Compared to placebo, mizolastine significantly reduces overall patient discomfort and pruritus in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies have also shown mizolastine to be at least as effective as other second‐generation antihistamines. Furthermore, with long‐term use of mizolastine over 1 year, a reduction in pruritus and the number of urticarial episodes was maintained with no evidence of tachyphylaxis or tolerance. Mizolastine has also been shown to be an effective treatment for cold‐induced urticaria, causing significant delay in the whealing response to the ice‐cube test and also reducing the wheal diameter.