Loading…
Increased levels of high sensitive C-reactive protein in patients with chronic rheumatic valve disease: evidence of ongoing inflammation
The precise pathogenetic mechanism(s) of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease have never been defined. C‐reactive protein (CRP) is increased in patients with acute rheumatic fever, but it is not known whether plasma levels increase in patients with chronic rheumatic valve disease. The aim of...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of heart failure 2002-10, Vol.4 (5), p.593-595 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The precise pathogenetic mechanism(s) of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease have never been defined. C‐reactive protein (CRP) is increased in patients with acute rheumatic fever, but it is not known whether plasma levels increase in patients with chronic rheumatic valve disease. The aim of this study was to determine the role of inflammation detected by high sensitivity CRP (hs‐CRP) levels in the progression of chronic rheumatic valve disease. A total of 113 patients with chronic rheumatic valve disease (81 women, 32 men; mean age 40±14 years, range 13–70), 51 patients with prosthetic valve(s) (31 women, 20 men; mean age 48±13 years, range 21–71) and 102 healthy subjects (68 women, 34 men, mean age 41±12 years, range 25–73), as a control group, were assessed. Patients with acute rheumatic fever, acute infection, inflammatory disease, malignancy, acute myocardial infarction and trauma were excluded. hs‐CRP was determined using latex‐enhanced immunonephelometric assays on a BN II analyzer (Behring). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients in order to evaluate valvular disease. Levels of hs‐CRP were significantly higher in patients with chronic rheumatic heart disease than in patients with prosthetic valve(s) and healthy subjects (0.62±0.64 vs. 0.35±0.41 vs. 0.24±0.18 mg/l, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1388-9842 1879-0844 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1388-9842(02)00102-2 |