Loading…

Comparison of the distances covered during 3 and 6 min walking test

Aims: To determine the reproducibility of the distance covered in 3 min and its correlation with the 6 min walking test, as well as compare the distances covered at different time intervals. Secondly, to evaluate the relationship between the distances covered during these time periods and the maximu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Respiratory medicine 2002-10, Vol.96 (10), p.812-816
Main Authors: IRIBERRI, MILAGROS, GáLDIZ, JUAN BTA, GOROSTIZA, AMAIA, ANSOLA, PEDRO, JACA, CARMEN
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-a981b82cc720ac7f9040eed04e9dd60817b01f2392bed19eb5529cc6c9f9e6893
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-a981b82cc720ac7f9040eed04e9dd60817b01f2392bed19eb5529cc6c9f9e6893
container_end_page 816
container_issue 10
container_start_page 812
container_title Respiratory medicine
container_volume 96
creator IRIBERRI, MILAGROS
GáLDIZ, JUAN BTA
GOROSTIZA, AMAIA
ANSOLA, PEDRO
JACA, CARMEN
description Aims: To determine the reproducibility of the distance covered in 3 min and its correlation with the 6 min walking test, as well as compare the distances covered at different time intervals. Secondly, to evaluate the relationship between the distances covered during these time periods and the maximum oxygen intake obtained during a bicycle ergometer test. Methods: Forty-five Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disesase patients were included in the study. Subjects who were either physically limited or familiar with the test, or those with acute exacerbation in the month prior to the study, were excluded. Three walking tests were carried out each day In 30 patients for three consecutive days, and the distances covered in periods of 3 and 6 min were measured with 20 min rest between each walk. No incentive was given and the patients knew that the distances covered in 3 and 6 min would be quantified. Oxygen saturation, heart rate and degree of breathlessness (modified Borg scale) were registered at baseline. After 3 min, the distance covered and degree of breathlessness were also measured. After 6 min, oxygen saturation, heart rate, degree of breathlessness and distance covered in meters were registered. Spirometry was performed daily on each patient, and those with an FEV 1 variation of less than 10% were considered clinically and functionally stable. An exercise test using bicycle ergometer was carried out to determine maximum oxygen intake. A 3 min walking test was performed in 15 patients, independently on the same day, which was followed after 20 min rest with a 6 min walking test. Results: A significant increase was observed in the distance covered over 3 and 6 min in the first 5 walks, with the greatest increase seen in the first 3 walks. The correlation between the distance covered in 3 and 6 min was 0.98. The correlation between the distance covered in 3 min and oxygen intake was 0.64. No significant differences were observed between the distances covered in the 0–3 and 3 to 6 min periods. During the walking test, breathlessness was measured using the modified Borg scale, which was 1.8 after 3 min, and 3.2 after six min and 8.6 at the end of bicycle ergometer test. No significant differences were observed between the distance covered during the 3 minute test and the distance in the first 3 min of the 6 min walking test. Conclusions: A learning effect was observed when the walking test is carried out repeatedly over short time periods, with a significant in
doi_str_mv 10.1053/rmed.2002.1363
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72648807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0954611102913636</els_id><sourcerecordid>72648807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-a981b82cc720ac7f9040eed04e9dd60817b01f2392bed19eb5529cc6c9f9e6893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1v2zAQhomiRe04XTMGXJpNzvFDlDgWRpsUMNAlmQmKPLVs9OGQkov8-1CwkU6ZDrh77r3DQ8gVgy2DUtzGHv2WA_AtE0p8IGtWCl4IUPIjWYMuZaEYYytykdJfANBSwmeyYlwyrmu2Jrvd2B9sDGkc6NjS6Q9SH9JkB4eJuvGIET31cwzDbyqoHTxVtA8D_We7p6U3YZouyafWdgm_nOuGPP74_rC7L_a_7n7uvu0LJys1FTYfbGruXMXBuqrVIAHRg0TtvYKaVQ2wlgvNG_RMY1OWXDunnG41qlqLDbk55R7i-Dznw6YPyWHX2QHHOZmKK1nXUGVwewJdHFOK2JpDDL2NL4aBWbSZRZtZtJlFW164PifPzTJ5w8-eMvD1DNjkbNfGLCik_5zQtaokZK4-cZg9HANGk1zALNOHiG4yfgzv_fAKepqHvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72648807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the distances covered during 3 and 6 min walking test</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>IRIBERRI, MILAGROS ; GáLDIZ, JUAN BTA ; GOROSTIZA, AMAIA ; ANSOLA, PEDRO ; JACA, CARMEN</creator><creatorcontrib>IRIBERRI, MILAGROS ; GáLDIZ, JUAN BTA ; GOROSTIZA, AMAIA ; ANSOLA, PEDRO ; JACA, CARMEN</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: To determine the reproducibility of the distance covered in 3 min and its correlation with the 6 min walking test, as well as compare the distances covered at different time intervals. Secondly, to evaluate the relationship between the distances covered during these time periods and the maximum oxygen intake obtained during a bicycle ergometer test. Methods: Forty-five Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disesase patients were included in the study. Subjects who were either physically limited or familiar with the test, or those with acute exacerbation in the month prior to the study, were excluded. Three walking tests were carried out each day In 30 patients for three consecutive days, and the distances covered in periods of 3 and 6 min were measured with 20 min rest between each walk. No incentive was given and the patients knew that the distances covered in 3 and 6 min would be quantified. Oxygen saturation, heart rate and degree of breathlessness (modified Borg scale) were registered at baseline. After 3 min, the distance covered and degree of breathlessness were also measured. After 6 min, oxygen saturation, heart rate, degree of breathlessness and distance covered in meters were registered. Spirometry was performed daily on each patient, and those with an FEV 1 variation of less than 10% were considered clinically and functionally stable. An exercise test using bicycle ergometer was carried out to determine maximum oxygen intake. A 3 min walking test was performed in 15 patients, independently on the same day, which was followed after 20 min rest with a 6 min walking test. Results: A significant increase was observed in the distance covered over 3 and 6 min in the first 5 walks, with the greatest increase seen in the first 3 walks. The correlation between the distance covered in 3 and 6 min was 0.98. The correlation between the distance covered in 3 min and oxygen intake was 0.64. No significant differences were observed between the distances covered in the 0–3 and 3 to 6 min periods. During the walking test, breathlessness was measured using the modified Borg scale, which was 1.8 after 3 min, and 3.2 after six min and 8.6 at the end of bicycle ergometer test. No significant differences were observed between the distance covered during the 3 minute test and the distance in the first 3 min of the 6 min walking test. Conclusions: A learning effect was observed when the walking test is carried out repeatedly over short time periods, with a significant increase in the first 5 walks. Correlation between the distances covered in 3 and 6 min is very good, and acceptable when the distance covered over these periods is compared with oxygen intake and walking speed is constant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-6111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/rmed.2002.1363</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12412981</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma ; COPD ; Exercise Test - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Oxygen Consumption ; Pneumology ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - rehabilitation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Respiratory Mechanics ; Spirometry ; Time Factors ; Walking ; walking test</subject><ispartof>Respiratory medicine, 2002-10, Vol.96 (10), p.812-816</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-a981b82cc720ac7f9040eed04e9dd60817b01f2392bed19eb5529cc6c9f9e6893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-a981b82cc720ac7f9040eed04e9dd60817b01f2392bed19eb5529cc6c9f9e6893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13986740$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12412981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>IRIBERRI, MILAGROS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GáLDIZ, JUAN BTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOROSTIZA, AMAIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANSOLA, PEDRO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JACA, CARMEN</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the distances covered during 3 and 6 min walking test</title><title>Respiratory medicine</title><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><description>Aims: To determine the reproducibility of the distance covered in 3 min and its correlation with the 6 min walking test, as well as compare the distances covered at different time intervals. Secondly, to evaluate the relationship between the distances covered during these time periods and the maximum oxygen intake obtained during a bicycle ergometer test. Methods: Forty-five Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disesase patients were included in the study. Subjects who were either physically limited or familiar with the test, or those with acute exacerbation in the month prior to the study, were excluded. Three walking tests were carried out each day In 30 patients for three consecutive days, and the distances covered in periods of 3 and 6 min were measured with 20 min rest between each walk. No incentive was given and the patients knew that the distances covered in 3 and 6 min would be quantified. Oxygen saturation, heart rate and degree of breathlessness (modified Borg scale) were registered at baseline. After 3 min, the distance covered and degree of breathlessness were also measured. After 6 min, oxygen saturation, heart rate, degree of breathlessness and distance covered in meters were registered. Spirometry was performed daily on each patient, and those with an FEV 1 variation of less than 10% were considered clinically and functionally stable. An exercise test using bicycle ergometer was carried out to determine maximum oxygen intake. A 3 min walking test was performed in 15 patients, independently on the same day, which was followed after 20 min rest with a 6 min walking test. Results: A significant increase was observed in the distance covered over 3 and 6 min in the first 5 walks, with the greatest increase seen in the first 3 walks. The correlation between the distance covered in 3 and 6 min was 0.98. The correlation between the distance covered in 3 min and oxygen intake was 0.64. No significant differences were observed between the distances covered in the 0–3 and 3 to 6 min periods. During the walking test, breathlessness was measured using the modified Borg scale, which was 1.8 after 3 min, and 3.2 after six min and 8.6 at the end of bicycle ergometer test. No significant differences were observed between the distance covered during the 3 minute test and the distance in the first 3 min of the 6 min walking test. Conclusions: A learning effect was observed when the walking test is carried out repeatedly over short time periods, with a significant increase in the first 5 walks. Correlation between the distances covered in 3 and 6 min is very good, and acceptable when the distance covered over these periods is compared with oxygen intake and walking speed is constant.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</subject><subject>COPD</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Respiratory Mechanics</subject><subject>Spirometry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>walking test</subject><issn>0954-6111</issn><issn>1532-3064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1v2zAQhomiRe04XTMGXJpNzvFDlDgWRpsUMNAlmQmKPLVs9OGQkov8-1CwkU6ZDrh77r3DQ8gVgy2DUtzGHv2WA_AtE0p8IGtWCl4IUPIjWYMuZaEYYytykdJfANBSwmeyYlwyrmu2Jrvd2B9sDGkc6NjS6Q9SH9JkB4eJuvGIET31cwzDbyqoHTxVtA8D_We7p6U3YZouyafWdgm_nOuGPP74_rC7L_a_7n7uvu0LJys1FTYfbGruXMXBuqrVIAHRg0TtvYKaVQ2wlgvNG_RMY1OWXDunnG41qlqLDbk55R7i-Dznw6YPyWHX2QHHOZmKK1nXUGVwewJdHFOK2JpDDL2NL4aBWbSZRZtZtJlFW164PifPzTJ5w8-eMvD1DNjkbNfGLCik_5zQtaokZK4-cZg9HANGk1zALNOHiG4yfgzv_fAKepqHvg</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>IRIBERRI, MILAGROS</creator><creator>GáLDIZ, JUAN BTA</creator><creator>GOROSTIZA, AMAIA</creator><creator>ANSOLA, PEDRO</creator><creator>JACA, CARMEN</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>Comparison of the distances covered during 3 and 6 min walking test</title><author>IRIBERRI, MILAGROS ; GáLDIZ, JUAN BTA ; GOROSTIZA, AMAIA ; ANSOLA, PEDRO ; JACA, CARMEN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-a981b82cc720ac7f9040eed04e9dd60817b01f2392bed19eb5529cc6c9f9e6893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</topic><topic>COPD</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Respiratory Mechanics</topic><topic>Spirometry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>walking test</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>IRIBERRI, MILAGROS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GáLDIZ, JUAN BTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOROSTIZA, AMAIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANSOLA, PEDRO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JACA, CARMEN</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>IRIBERRI, MILAGROS</au><au>GáLDIZ, JUAN BTA</au><au>GOROSTIZA, AMAIA</au><au>ANSOLA, PEDRO</au><au>JACA, CARMEN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the distances covered during 3 and 6 min walking test</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>812</spage><epage>816</epage><pages>812-816</pages><issn>0954-6111</issn><eissn>1532-3064</eissn><abstract>Aims: To determine the reproducibility of the distance covered in 3 min and its correlation with the 6 min walking test, as well as compare the distances covered at different time intervals. Secondly, to evaluate the relationship between the distances covered during these time periods and the maximum oxygen intake obtained during a bicycle ergometer test. Methods: Forty-five Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disesase patients were included in the study. Subjects who were either physically limited or familiar with the test, or those with acute exacerbation in the month prior to the study, were excluded. Three walking tests were carried out each day In 30 patients for three consecutive days, and the distances covered in periods of 3 and 6 min were measured with 20 min rest between each walk. No incentive was given and the patients knew that the distances covered in 3 and 6 min would be quantified. Oxygen saturation, heart rate and degree of breathlessness (modified Borg scale) were registered at baseline. After 3 min, the distance covered and degree of breathlessness were also measured. After 6 min, oxygen saturation, heart rate, degree of breathlessness and distance covered in meters were registered. Spirometry was performed daily on each patient, and those with an FEV 1 variation of less than 10% were considered clinically and functionally stable. An exercise test using bicycle ergometer was carried out to determine maximum oxygen intake. A 3 min walking test was performed in 15 patients, independently on the same day, which was followed after 20 min rest with a 6 min walking test. Results: A significant increase was observed in the distance covered over 3 and 6 min in the first 5 walks, with the greatest increase seen in the first 3 walks. The correlation between the distance covered in 3 and 6 min was 0.98. The correlation between the distance covered in 3 min and oxygen intake was 0.64. No significant differences were observed between the distances covered in the 0–3 and 3 to 6 min periods. During the walking test, breathlessness was measured using the modified Borg scale, which was 1.8 after 3 min, and 3.2 after six min and 8.6 at the end of bicycle ergometer test. No significant differences were observed between the distance covered during the 3 minute test and the distance in the first 3 min of the 6 min walking test. Conclusions: A learning effect was observed when the walking test is carried out repeatedly over short time periods, with a significant increase in the first 5 walks. Correlation between the distances covered in 3 and 6 min is very good, and acceptable when the distance covered over these periods is compared with oxygen intake and walking speed is constant.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12412981</pmid><doi>10.1053/rmed.2002.1363</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-6111
ispartof Respiratory medicine, 2002-10, Vol.96 (10), p.812-816
issn 0954-6111
1532-3064
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72648807
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma
COPD
Exercise Test - methods
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Oxygen Consumption
Pneumology
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - rehabilitation
Reproducibility of Results
Respiratory Mechanics
Spirometry
Time Factors
Walking
walking test
title Comparison of the distances covered during 3 and 6 min walking test
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A30%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20distances%20covered%20during%203%20and%206%20min%20walking%20test&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20medicine&rft.au=IRIBERRI,%20MILAGROS&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=812&rft.epage=816&rft.pages=812-816&rft.issn=0954-6111&rft.eissn=1532-3064&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/rmed.2002.1363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72648807%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-a981b82cc720ac7f9040eed04e9dd60817b01f2392bed19eb5529cc6c9f9e6893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72648807&rft_id=info:pmid/12412981&rfr_iscdi=true