Loading…

ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once (‘weak’) or three times (‘strong’). The probability of an ‘old’ response was significantly higher for strong than weak wo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuropsychologia 2002, Vol.40 (13), p.2288-2304
Main Authors: Finnigan, Simon, Humphreys, Michael S, Dennis, Simon, Geffen, Gina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e90e025514edfcc9d5b21dfcf9f62e345a44470e88be9bc45f70f4b60956f71d3
cites
container_end_page 2304
container_issue 13
container_start_page 2288
container_title Neuropsychologia
container_volume 40
creator Finnigan, Simon
Humphreys, Michael S
Dennis, Simon
Geffen, Gina
description Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once (‘weak’) or three times (‘strong’). The probability of an ‘old’ response was significantly higher for strong than weak words and significantly higher for weak than new words. Comparisons were made initially between ERPs to new, weak and strong words, and subsequently between ERPs associated with six strength-by-response conditions. The N400 component was found to be modulated by memory trace strength in a graded manner. Its amplitude was most negative in new word ERPs and most positive in strong word ERPs. This ‘N400 strength effect’ was largest at the left parietal electrode (in ear-referenced ERPs). The amplitude of the late positive complex (LPC) effect was sensitive to decision accuracy (and perhaps confidence). Its amplitude was larger in ERPs evoked by words attracting correct versus incorrect recognition decisions. The LPC effect had a left>right, centro-parietal scalp topography (in ear-referenced ERPs). Hence, whereas, the majority of previous ERP studies of episodic recognition have interpreted results from the perspective of dual-process models, we provide alternative interpretations of N400 and LPC old/new effects in terms of memory strength and decisional factor(s).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00113-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72664774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393202001136</els_id><sourcerecordid>72664774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e90e025514edfcc9d5b21dfcf9f62e345a44470e88be9bc45f70f4b60956f71d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlKBDEQhoMoOi6PoPRFcQ6tlXTSixeRYVxAUFzOIZ1UtKUXTXqUufkY-no-iRln0KNQUHX4qurnI2SbwgEFmh7eArA8ToqE7QMbAlCaxOkSGdA8S-JEUL5MBr_IGln3_gkAuGD5KlmjjNOMi2JARuOb6-jr_aOrzWGLb1_vnxFai7r3R1GDTeemke8dtg_9Y6RaExnUla-6VtWRVbrv3L4fbpIVq2qPW4u-Qe5Px3ej8_jy6uxidHIZawFFH2MBCEyEaGis1oURJaNhsoVNGSZcKM55BpjnJRal5sJmYHmZQiFSm1GTbJC9-d1n171M0PeyqbzGulYtdhMvM5amPMt4AMUc1K7z3qGVz65qlJtKCnJmT_7YkzM1EkLN7Mk07O0sHkzKBs3f1kJXAHYXgPJa1dapNuj44ziAYMkswPGcw6DjtUInva6w1WgqF9xK01X_RPkGiCiMag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72664774</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Finnigan, Simon ; Humphreys, Michael S ; Dennis, Simon ; Geffen, Gina</creator><creatorcontrib>Finnigan, Simon ; Humphreys, Michael S ; Dennis, Simon ; Geffen, Gina</creatorcontrib><description>Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once (‘weak’) or three times (‘strong’). The probability of an ‘old’ response was significantly higher for strong than weak words and significantly higher for weak than new words. Comparisons were made initially between ERPs to new, weak and strong words, and subsequently between ERPs associated with six strength-by-response conditions. The N400 component was found to be modulated by memory trace strength in a graded manner. Its amplitude was most negative in new word ERPs and most positive in strong word ERPs. This ‘N400 strength effect’ was largest at the left parietal electrode (in ear-referenced ERPs). The amplitude of the late positive complex (LPC) effect was sensitive to decision accuracy (and perhaps confidence). Its amplitude was larger in ERPs evoked by words attracting correct versus incorrect recognition decisions. The LPC effect had a left&gt;right, centro-parietal scalp topography (in ear-referenced ERPs). Hence, whereas, the majority of previous ERP studies of episodic recognition have interpreted results from the perspective of dual-process models, we provide alternative interpretations of N400 and LPC old/new effects in terms of memory strength and decisional factor(s).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00113-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12417459</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NUPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - physiology ; Decision Making ; Electroencephalography ; Electrophysiology ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Familiarity ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Judgment ; Learning. Memory ; LPC ; Male ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; N400 ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Random Allocation ; Recognition ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Recollection ; Single-process models ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2002, Vol.40 (13), p.2288-2304</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e90e025514edfcc9d5b21dfcf9f62e345a44470e88be9bc45f70f4b60956f71d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14005234$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12417459$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finnigan, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geffen, Gina</creatorcontrib><title>ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once (‘weak’) or three times (‘strong’). The probability of an ‘old’ response was significantly higher for strong than weak words and significantly higher for weak than new words. Comparisons were made initially between ERPs to new, weak and strong words, and subsequently between ERPs associated with six strength-by-response conditions. The N400 component was found to be modulated by memory trace strength in a graded manner. Its amplitude was most negative in new word ERPs and most positive in strong word ERPs. This ‘N400 strength effect’ was largest at the left parietal electrode (in ear-referenced ERPs). The amplitude of the late positive complex (LPC) effect was sensitive to decision accuracy (and perhaps confidence). Its amplitude was larger in ERPs evoked by words attracting correct versus incorrect recognition decisions. The LPC effect had a left&gt;right, centro-parietal scalp topography (in ear-referenced ERPs). Hence, whereas, the majority of previous ERP studies of episodic recognition have interpreted results from the perspective of dual-process models, we provide alternative interpretations of N400 and LPC old/new effects in terms of memory strength and decisional factor(s).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>LPC</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>N400</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Recollection</subject><subject>Single-process models</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMlKBDEQhoMoOi6PoPRFcQ6tlXTSixeRYVxAUFzOIZ1UtKUXTXqUufkY-no-iRln0KNQUHX4qurnI2SbwgEFmh7eArA8ToqE7QMbAlCaxOkSGdA8S-JEUL5MBr_IGln3_gkAuGD5KlmjjNOMi2JARuOb6-jr_aOrzWGLb1_vnxFai7r3R1GDTeemke8dtg_9Y6RaExnUla-6VtWRVbrv3L4fbpIVq2qPW4u-Qe5Px3ej8_jy6uxidHIZawFFH2MBCEyEaGis1oURJaNhsoVNGSZcKM55BpjnJRal5sJmYHmZQiFSm1GTbJC9-d1n171M0PeyqbzGulYtdhMvM5amPMt4AMUc1K7z3qGVz65qlJtKCnJmT_7YkzM1EkLN7Mk07O0sHkzKBs3f1kJXAHYXgPJa1dapNuj44ziAYMkswPGcw6DjtUInva6w1WgqF9xK01X_RPkGiCiMag</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Finnigan, Simon</creator><creator>Humphreys, Michael S</creator><creator>Dennis, Simon</creator><creator>Geffen, Gina</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)</title><author>Finnigan, Simon ; Humphreys, Michael S ; Dennis, Simon ; Geffen, Gina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e90e025514edfcc9d5b21dfcf9f62e345a44470e88be9bc45f70f4b60956f71d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>LPC</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>N400</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Recollection</topic><topic>Single-process models</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finnigan, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geffen, Gina</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finnigan, Simon</au><au>Humphreys, Michael S</au><au>Dennis, Simon</au><au>Geffen, Gina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2288</spage><epage>2304</epage><pages>2288-2304</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><coden>NUPSA6</coden><abstract>Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once (‘weak’) or three times (‘strong’). The probability of an ‘old’ response was significantly higher for strong than weak words and significantly higher for weak than new words. Comparisons were made initially between ERPs to new, weak and strong words, and subsequently between ERPs associated with six strength-by-response conditions. The N400 component was found to be modulated by memory trace strength in a graded manner. Its amplitude was most negative in new word ERPs and most positive in strong word ERPs. This ‘N400 strength effect’ was largest at the left parietal electrode (in ear-referenced ERPs). The amplitude of the late positive complex (LPC) effect was sensitive to decision accuracy (and perhaps confidence). Its amplitude was larger in ERPs evoked by words attracting correct versus incorrect recognition decisions. The LPC effect had a left&gt;right, centro-parietal scalp topography (in ear-referenced ERPs). Hence, whereas, the majority of previous ERP studies of episodic recognition have interpreted results from the perspective of dual-process models, we provide alternative interpretations of N400 and LPC old/new effects in terms of memory strength and decisional factor(s).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12417459</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00113-6</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3932
ispartof Neuropsychologia, 2002, Vol.40 (13), p.2288-2304
issn 0028-3932
1873-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72664774
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adult
Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Brain - physiology
Decision Making
Electroencephalography
Electrophysiology
Evoked Potentials - physiology
Eye Movements - physiology
Familiarity
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Judgment
Learning. Memory
LPC
Male
Memory
Memory - physiology
N400
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Random Allocation
Recognition
Recognition (Psychology)
Recollection
Single-process models
Time Factors
title ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A47%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ERP%20%E2%80%98old/new%E2%80%99%20effects:%20memory%20strength%20and%20decisional%20factor(s)&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Finnigan,%20Simon&rft.date=2002&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2288&rft.epage=2304&rft.pages=2288-2304&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft.coden=NUPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00113-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72664774%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e90e025514edfcc9d5b21dfcf9f62e345a44470e88be9bc45f70f4b60956f71d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72664774&rft_id=info:pmid/12417459&rfr_iscdi=true