Loading…
ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)
Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once (‘weak’) or three times (‘strong’). The probability of an ‘old’ response was significantly higher for strong than weak wo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neuropsychologia 2002, Vol.40 (13), p.2288-2304 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e90e025514edfcc9d5b21dfcf9f62e345a44470e88be9bc45f70f4b60956f71d3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 2304 |
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 2288 |
container_title | Neuropsychologia |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Finnigan, Simon Humphreys, Michael S Dennis, Simon Geffen, Gina |
description | Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once (‘weak’) or three times (‘strong’). The probability of an ‘old’ response was significantly higher for strong than weak words and significantly higher for weak than new words. Comparisons were made initially between ERPs to new, weak and strong words, and subsequently between ERPs associated with six strength-by-response conditions. The N400 component was found to be modulated by memory trace strength in a graded manner. Its amplitude was most negative in new word ERPs and most positive in strong word ERPs. This ‘N400 strength effect’ was largest at the left parietal electrode (in ear-referenced ERPs). The amplitude of the late positive complex (LPC) effect was sensitive to decision accuracy (and perhaps confidence). Its amplitude was larger in ERPs evoked by words attracting correct versus incorrect recognition decisions. The LPC effect had a left>right, centro-parietal scalp topography (in ear-referenced ERPs). Hence, whereas, the majority of previous ERP studies of episodic recognition have interpreted results from the perspective of dual-process models, we provide alternative interpretations of N400 and LPC old/new effects in terms of memory strength and decisional factor(s). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00113-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72664774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393202001136</els_id><sourcerecordid>72664774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e90e025514edfcc9d5b21dfcf9f62e345a44470e88be9bc45f70f4b60956f71d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlKBDEQhoMoOi6PoPRFcQ6tlXTSixeRYVxAUFzOIZ1UtKUXTXqUufkY-no-iRln0KNQUHX4qurnI2SbwgEFmh7eArA8ToqE7QMbAlCaxOkSGdA8S-JEUL5MBr_IGln3_gkAuGD5KlmjjNOMi2JARuOb6-jr_aOrzWGLb1_vnxFai7r3R1GDTeemke8dtg_9Y6RaExnUla-6VtWRVbrv3L4fbpIVq2qPW4u-Qe5Px3ej8_jy6uxidHIZawFFH2MBCEyEaGis1oURJaNhsoVNGSZcKM55BpjnJRal5sJmYHmZQiFSm1GTbJC9-d1n171M0PeyqbzGulYtdhMvM5amPMt4AMUc1K7z3qGVz65qlJtKCnJmT_7YkzM1EkLN7Mk07O0sHkzKBs3f1kJXAHYXgPJa1dapNuj44ziAYMkswPGcw6DjtUInva6w1WgqF9xK01X_RPkGiCiMag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72664774</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Finnigan, Simon ; Humphreys, Michael S ; Dennis, Simon ; Geffen, Gina</creator><creatorcontrib>Finnigan, Simon ; Humphreys, Michael S ; Dennis, Simon ; Geffen, Gina</creatorcontrib><description>Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once (‘weak’) or three times (‘strong’). The probability of an ‘old’ response was significantly higher for strong than weak words and significantly higher for weak than new words. Comparisons were made initially between ERPs to new, weak and strong words, and subsequently between ERPs associated with six strength-by-response conditions. The N400 component was found to be modulated by memory trace strength in a graded manner. Its amplitude was most negative in new word ERPs and most positive in strong word ERPs. This ‘N400 strength effect’ was largest at the left parietal electrode (in ear-referenced ERPs). The amplitude of the late positive complex (LPC) effect was sensitive to decision accuracy (and perhaps confidence). Its amplitude was larger in ERPs evoked by words attracting correct versus incorrect recognition decisions. The LPC effect had a left>right, centro-parietal scalp topography (in ear-referenced ERPs). Hence, whereas, the majority of previous ERP studies of episodic recognition have interpreted results from the perspective of dual-process models, we provide alternative interpretations of N400 and LPC old/new effects in terms of memory strength and decisional factor(s).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00113-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12417459</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NUPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - physiology ; Decision Making ; Electroencephalography ; Electrophysiology ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Familiarity ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Judgment ; Learning. Memory ; LPC ; Male ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; N400 ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Random Allocation ; Recognition ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Recollection ; Single-process models ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2002, Vol.40 (13), p.2288-2304</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e90e025514edfcc9d5b21dfcf9f62e345a44470e88be9bc45f70f4b60956f71d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14005234$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12417459$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finnigan, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geffen, Gina</creatorcontrib><title>ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once (‘weak’) or three times (‘strong’). The probability of an ‘old’ response was significantly higher for strong than weak words and significantly higher for weak than new words. Comparisons were made initially between ERPs to new, weak and strong words, and subsequently between ERPs associated with six strength-by-response conditions. The N400 component was found to be modulated by memory trace strength in a graded manner. Its amplitude was most negative in new word ERPs and most positive in strong word ERPs. This ‘N400 strength effect’ was largest at the left parietal electrode (in ear-referenced ERPs). The amplitude of the late positive complex (LPC) effect was sensitive to decision accuracy (and perhaps confidence). Its amplitude was larger in ERPs evoked by words attracting correct versus incorrect recognition decisions. The LPC effect had a left>right, centro-parietal scalp topography (in ear-referenced ERPs). Hence, whereas, the majority of previous ERP studies of episodic recognition have interpreted results from the perspective of dual-process models, we provide alternative interpretations of N400 and LPC old/new effects in terms of memory strength and decisional factor(s).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>LPC</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>N400</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Recollection</subject><subject>Single-process models</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMlKBDEQhoMoOi6PoPRFcQ6tlXTSixeRYVxAUFzOIZ1UtKUXTXqUufkY-no-iRln0KNQUHX4qurnI2SbwgEFmh7eArA8ToqE7QMbAlCaxOkSGdA8S-JEUL5MBr_IGln3_gkAuGD5KlmjjNOMi2JARuOb6-jr_aOrzWGLb1_vnxFai7r3R1GDTeemke8dtg_9Y6RaExnUla-6VtWRVbrv3L4fbpIVq2qPW4u-Qe5Px3ej8_jy6uxidHIZawFFH2MBCEyEaGis1oURJaNhsoVNGSZcKM55BpjnJRal5sJmYHmZQiFSm1GTbJC9-d1n171M0PeyqbzGulYtdhMvM5amPMt4AMUc1K7z3qGVz65qlJtKCnJmT_7YkzM1EkLN7Mk07O0sHkzKBs3f1kJXAHYXgPJa1dapNuj44ziAYMkswPGcw6DjtUInva6w1WgqF9xK01X_RPkGiCiMag</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Finnigan, Simon</creator><creator>Humphreys, Michael S</creator><creator>Dennis, Simon</creator><creator>Geffen, Gina</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)</title><author>Finnigan, Simon ; Humphreys, Michael S ; Dennis, Simon ; Geffen, Gina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e90e025514edfcc9d5b21dfcf9f62e345a44470e88be9bc45f70f4b60956f71d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>LPC</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>N400</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Recollection</topic><topic>Single-process models</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finnigan, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geffen, Gina</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finnigan, Simon</au><au>Humphreys, Michael S</au><au>Dennis, Simon</au><au>Geffen, Gina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s)</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2288</spage><epage>2304</epage><pages>2288-2304</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><coden>NUPSA6</coden><abstract>Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects made old/new recognition judgments on new unstudied words and old words which had been presented at study either once (‘weak’) or three times (‘strong’). The probability of an ‘old’ response was significantly higher for strong than weak words and significantly higher for weak than new words. Comparisons were made initially between ERPs to new, weak and strong words, and subsequently between ERPs associated with six strength-by-response conditions. The N400 component was found to be modulated by memory trace strength in a graded manner. Its amplitude was most negative in new word ERPs and most positive in strong word ERPs. This ‘N400 strength effect’ was largest at the left parietal electrode (in ear-referenced ERPs). The amplitude of the late positive complex (LPC) effect was sensitive to decision accuracy (and perhaps confidence). Its amplitude was larger in ERPs evoked by words attracting correct versus incorrect recognition decisions. The LPC effect had a left>right, centro-parietal scalp topography (in ear-referenced ERPs). Hence, whereas, the majority of previous ERP studies of episodic recognition have interpreted results from the perspective of dual-process models, we provide alternative interpretations of N400 and LPC old/new effects in terms of memory strength and decisional factor(s).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12417459</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00113-6</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-3932 |
ispartof | Neuropsychologia, 2002, Vol.40 (13), p.2288-2304 |
issn | 0028-3932 1873-3514 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72664774 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Adult Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Brain - physiology Decision Making Electroencephalography Electrophysiology Evoked Potentials - physiology Eye Movements - physiology Familiarity Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Judgment Learning. Memory LPC Male Memory Memory - physiology N400 Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Random Allocation Recognition Recognition (Psychology) Recollection Single-process models Time Factors |
title | ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A47%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ERP%20%E2%80%98old/new%E2%80%99%20effects:%20memory%20strength%20and%20decisional%20factor(s)&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Finnigan,%20Simon&rft.date=2002&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2288&rft.epage=2304&rft.pages=2288-2304&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft.coden=NUPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00113-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72664774%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e90e025514edfcc9d5b21dfcf9f62e345a44470e88be9bc45f70f4b60956f71d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72664774&rft_id=info:pmid/12417459&rfr_iscdi=true |