Loading…

Mouse genetic model for bone strength and size phenotypes: NZB/B1NJ and RF/J inbred strains

The relationships of bone size, bone strength, and bone formation were investigated in two strains of mice, NZB/B1NJ and RF/J. Measurement of the femur midshaft size by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) showed that the RF/J mice had a 32% greater cross-sectional area than NZB/B1NJ m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bone (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2002-12, Vol.31 (6), p.670-674
Main Authors: Wergedal, J.E, Sheng, M.H.-C, Ackert-Bicknell, C.L, Beamer, W.G, Baylink, D.J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-5a7c7433c2e888a79f98f2f1d78fcc24d64c5f0f882a5ad7e85063d84f4324d63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-5a7c7433c2e888a79f98f2f1d78fcc24d64c5f0f882a5ad7e85063d84f4324d63
container_end_page 674
container_issue 6
container_start_page 670
container_title Bone (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 31
creator Wergedal, J.E
Sheng, M.H.-C
Ackert-Bicknell, C.L
Beamer, W.G
Baylink, D.J
description The relationships of bone size, bone strength, and bone formation were investigated in two strains of mice, NZB/B1NJ and RF/J. Measurement of the femur midshaft size by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) showed that the RF/J mice had a 32% greater cross-sectional area than NZB/B1NJ mice at 10 weeks of age, and a 38% greater cross-sectional area at 22 weeks of age. Body weight in the RF/J mice was 10% higher at 10 weeks but 9% lower at 22 weeks. Bone strength was determined by a three-point bending method. In agreement with the difference in bone cross-sectional area, the femurs of the RF/J mice were stronger (80% greater) and stiffer (80% greater) than the bones of the NZB/B1NJ mice. To determine whether periosteal bone formation played a role in the greater size of the RF/J mice, the mice were injected with tetracycline to label areas of new bone formation. Histomorphometrical analysis of the femur diaphysis demonstrated higher rates of periosteal bone formation (131% greater) and of periosteal forming surface (81% greater) in RF/J than in NZB/B1NJ mice. We conclude that a high rate of periosteal bone formation increases bone size and strength in RF/J mice when compared with NZB/B1NJ mice. The NZB/B1NJ and RF/J mice should be an excellent model to investigate the genes that regulate femur size and strength.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00908-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72826174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S8756328202009080</els_id><sourcerecordid>72826174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-5a7c7433c2e888a79f98f2f1d78fcc24d64c5f0f882a5ad7e85063d84f4324d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1vEzEQhi1ERUPhJ4B8AcFhydher51eEK1oS1WKxMcFDpZjj1ujjTfYG6Ty6-ttInqsNJIP87wz44eQFwzeMWDd_JtWsmsE1_wN8LcAC9ANPCIzppVouOrEYzL7j-yTp6X8BgCxUOwJ2WdcCiY7mJFfn4dNQXqFCcfo6Grw2NMwZLocEtIyZkxX4zW1ydMS_yFdX2Maxps1lkN6-fNofsQuz--6X0_m5zSmZUY_xWxM5RnZC7Yv-Hz3HpAfJx-_H581F19OPx1_uGhcy_nYSKucaoVwHLXWVi3CQgcemFc6OMdb37VOBghacyutV6gldMLrNrRi6ooD8no7d52HPxsso1nF4rDvbcL6O6OqgY7VFQ-BTHeSccErKLegy0MpGYNZ57iy-cYwMJN-c6ffTG4N1Jr0G6i5l7sFm-UK_X1q57sCr3aALc72IdvkYrnn2hZ0JSv3fsth9fY3YjbFRUwOfczoRuOH-MApt3tFn64</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18651232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mouse genetic model for bone strength and size phenotypes: NZB/B1NJ and RF/J inbred strains</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Wergedal, J.E ; Sheng, M.H.-C ; Ackert-Bicknell, C.L ; Beamer, W.G ; Baylink, D.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Wergedal, J.E ; Sheng, M.H.-C ; Ackert-Bicknell, C.L ; Beamer, W.G ; Baylink, D.J</creatorcontrib><description>The relationships of bone size, bone strength, and bone formation were investigated in two strains of mice, NZB/B1NJ and RF/J. Measurement of the femur midshaft size by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) showed that the RF/J mice had a 32% greater cross-sectional area than NZB/B1NJ mice at 10 weeks of age, and a 38% greater cross-sectional area at 22 weeks of age. Body weight in the RF/J mice was 10% higher at 10 weeks but 9% lower at 22 weeks. Bone strength was determined by a three-point bending method. In agreement with the difference in bone cross-sectional area, the femurs of the RF/J mice were stronger (80% greater) and stiffer (80% greater) than the bones of the NZB/B1NJ mice. To determine whether periosteal bone formation played a role in the greater size of the RF/J mice, the mice were injected with tetracycline to label areas of new bone formation. Histomorphometrical analysis of the femur diaphysis demonstrated higher rates of periosteal bone formation (131% greater) and of periosteal forming surface (81% greater) in RF/J than in NZB/B1NJ mice. We conclude that a high rate of periosteal bone formation increases bone size and strength in RF/J mice when compared with NZB/B1NJ mice. The NZB/B1NJ and RF/J mice should be an excellent model to investigate the genes that regulate femur size and strength.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-3282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00908-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12531560</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone formation ; Bone size ; Bone strength ; Female ; Femur - growth &amp; development ; Femur - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genes ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred NZB ; Mice, Inbred Strains ; Models, Animal ; Osteogenesis - genetics ; Periosteum ; Phenotype ; Skeleton and joints ; Species Specificity ; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><ispartof>Bone (New York, N.Y.), 2002-12, Vol.31 (6), p.670-674</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 by Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-5a7c7433c2e888a79f98f2f1d78fcc24d64c5f0f882a5ad7e85063d84f4324d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-5a7c7433c2e888a79f98f2f1d78fcc24d64c5f0f882a5ad7e85063d84f4324d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14408315$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12531560$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wergedal, J.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, M.H.-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackert-Bicknell, C.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beamer, W.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baylink, D.J</creatorcontrib><title>Mouse genetic model for bone strength and size phenotypes: NZB/B1NJ and RF/J inbred strains</title><title>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Bone</addtitle><description>The relationships of bone size, bone strength, and bone formation were investigated in two strains of mice, NZB/B1NJ and RF/J. Measurement of the femur midshaft size by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) showed that the RF/J mice had a 32% greater cross-sectional area than NZB/B1NJ mice at 10 weeks of age, and a 38% greater cross-sectional area at 22 weeks of age. Body weight in the RF/J mice was 10% higher at 10 weeks but 9% lower at 22 weeks. Bone strength was determined by a three-point bending method. In agreement with the difference in bone cross-sectional area, the femurs of the RF/J mice were stronger (80% greater) and stiffer (80% greater) than the bones of the NZB/B1NJ mice. To determine whether periosteal bone formation played a role in the greater size of the RF/J mice, the mice were injected with tetracycline to label areas of new bone formation. Histomorphometrical analysis of the femur diaphysis demonstrated higher rates of periosteal bone formation (131% greater) and of periosteal forming surface (81% greater) in RF/J than in NZB/B1NJ mice. We conclude that a high rate of periosteal bone formation increases bone size and strength in RF/J mice when compared with NZB/B1NJ mice. The NZB/B1NJ and RF/J mice should be an excellent model to investigate the genes that regulate femur size and strength.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone formation</subject><subject>Bone size</subject><subject>Bone strength</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Femur - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred NZB</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred Strains</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Osteogenesis - genetics</subject><subject>Periosteum</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Skeleton and joints</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><issn>8756-3282</issn><issn>1873-2763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1vEzEQhi1ERUPhJ4B8AcFhydher51eEK1oS1WKxMcFDpZjj1ujjTfYG6Ty6-ttInqsNJIP87wz44eQFwzeMWDd_JtWsmsE1_wN8LcAC9ANPCIzppVouOrEYzL7j-yTp6X8BgCxUOwJ2WdcCiY7mJFfn4dNQXqFCcfo6Grw2NMwZLocEtIyZkxX4zW1ydMS_yFdX2Maxps1lkN6-fNofsQuz--6X0_m5zSmZUY_xWxM5RnZC7Yv-Hz3HpAfJx-_H581F19OPx1_uGhcy_nYSKucaoVwHLXWVi3CQgcemFc6OMdb37VOBghacyutV6gldMLrNrRi6ooD8no7d52HPxsso1nF4rDvbcL6O6OqgY7VFQ-BTHeSccErKLegy0MpGYNZ57iy-cYwMJN-c6ffTG4N1Jr0G6i5l7sFm-UK_X1q57sCr3aALc72IdvkYrnn2hZ0JSv3fsth9fY3YjbFRUwOfczoRuOH-MApt3tFn64</recordid><startdate>20021201</startdate><enddate>20021201</enddate><creator>Wergedal, J.E</creator><creator>Sheng, M.H.-C</creator><creator>Ackert-Bicknell, C.L</creator><creator>Beamer, W.G</creator><creator>Baylink, D.J</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021201</creationdate><title>Mouse genetic model for bone strength and size phenotypes: NZB/B1NJ and RF/J inbred strains</title><author>Wergedal, J.E ; Sheng, M.H.-C ; Ackert-Bicknell, C.L ; Beamer, W.G ; Baylink, D.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-5a7c7433c2e888a79f98f2f1d78fcc24d64c5f0f882a5ad7e85063d84f4324d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone formation</topic><topic>Bone size</topic><topic>Bone strength</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Femur - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred NZB</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred Strains</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Osteogenesis - genetics</topic><topic>Periosteum</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Skeleton and joints</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wergedal, J.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, M.H.-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackert-Bicknell, C.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beamer, W.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baylink, D.J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wergedal, J.E</au><au>Sheng, M.H.-C</au><au>Ackert-Bicknell, C.L</au><au>Beamer, W.G</au><au>Baylink, D.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mouse genetic model for bone strength and size phenotypes: NZB/B1NJ and RF/J inbred strains</atitle><jtitle>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Bone</addtitle><date>2002-12-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>674</epage><pages>670-674</pages><issn>8756-3282</issn><eissn>1873-2763</eissn><abstract>The relationships of bone size, bone strength, and bone formation were investigated in two strains of mice, NZB/B1NJ and RF/J. Measurement of the femur midshaft size by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) showed that the RF/J mice had a 32% greater cross-sectional area than NZB/B1NJ mice at 10 weeks of age, and a 38% greater cross-sectional area at 22 weeks of age. Body weight in the RF/J mice was 10% higher at 10 weeks but 9% lower at 22 weeks. Bone strength was determined by a three-point bending method. In agreement with the difference in bone cross-sectional area, the femurs of the RF/J mice were stronger (80% greater) and stiffer (80% greater) than the bones of the NZB/B1NJ mice. To determine whether periosteal bone formation played a role in the greater size of the RF/J mice, the mice were injected with tetracycline to label areas of new bone formation. Histomorphometrical analysis of the femur diaphysis demonstrated higher rates of periosteal bone formation (131% greater) and of periosteal forming surface (81% greater) in RF/J than in NZB/B1NJ mice. We conclude that a high rate of periosteal bone formation increases bone size and strength in RF/J mice when compared with NZB/B1NJ mice. The NZB/B1NJ and RF/J mice should be an excellent model to investigate the genes that regulate femur size and strength.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12531560</pmid><doi>10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00908-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8756-3282
ispartof Bone (New York, N.Y.), 2002-12, Vol.31 (6), p.670-674
issn 8756-3282
1873-2763
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72826174
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone formation
Bone size
Bone strength
Female
Femur - growth & development
Femur - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genes
Mice
Mice, Inbred NZB
Mice, Inbred Strains
Models, Animal
Osteogenesis - genetics
Periosteum
Phenotype
Skeleton and joints
Species Specificity
Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system
title Mouse genetic model for bone strength and size phenotypes: NZB/B1NJ and RF/J inbred strains
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T18%3A01%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mouse%20genetic%20model%20for%20bone%20strength%20and%20size%20phenotypes:%20NZB/B1NJ%20and%20RF/J%20inbred%20strains&rft.jtitle=Bone%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Wergedal,%20J.E&rft.date=2002-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=674&rft.pages=670-674&rft.issn=8756-3282&rft.eissn=1873-2763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00908-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72826174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-5a7c7433c2e888a79f98f2f1d78fcc24d64c5f0f882a5ad7e85063d84f4324d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18651232&rft_id=info:pmid/12531560&rfr_iscdi=true