Loading…

Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans

A new measure of balance, functional reach, has been recently developed. Functional reach is the maximal distance one can reach forward beyond arm's length while maintaining a fixed base of support in the standing position. Reliability, criterion, and concurrent construct validity of functional...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of gerontology (Kirkwood) 1992-05, Vol.47 (3), p.M93-M98
Main Authors: Duncan, P W, Studenski, S, Chandler, J, Prescott, B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-754839597618e08a90752e3659c282d69210abfb10f52722fa53e5af3a972fd93
cites
container_end_page M98
container_issue 3
container_start_page M93
container_title Journal of gerontology (Kirkwood)
container_volume 47
creator Duncan, P W
Studenski, S
Chandler, J
Prescott, B
description A new measure of balance, functional reach, has been recently developed. Functional reach is the maximal distance one can reach forward beyond arm's length while maintaining a fixed base of support in the standing position. Reliability, criterion, and concurrent construct validity of functional reach have been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive validity of functional reach in identifying elderly subjects at risk for recurrent falls. Two hundred and seventeen elderly, community-dwelling male veterans (aged 70-104) underwent baseline screening and were followed for 6 months to monitor falls. Subjects with two or more falls during the 6-month follow-up were classified as recurrent fallers. Logistic regression reveals that if individuals were unable to reach, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of having two falls was 8.07 (2.8-23.71); if their reach was less than or equal to 6 inches the OR was 4.02 (1.84-8.77); and if reach was greater than 6 inches but less than 10 inches the OR was 2.00 (1.35-2.98). The association between functional reach and recurrent falls was not confounded by age, depression, or cognition. We conclude that functional reach is a simple and easy-to-use clinical measure that has predictive validity in identifying recurrent falls.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/geronj/47.3.m93
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72913440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1301143037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-754839597618e08a90752e3659c282d69210abfb10f52722fa53e5af3a972fd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10d1r20AMAPBjrKRZ2uc9FY4N9uZEJ_l8vr6VsqwtKX1pn4-LLW8O_sju7ED--3qkMCj0SUj8JJAkxFcFSwWWVr859N1ulZolLVtLn8QciVRChPRZzAEQE5UinosvMe4AFGaQzcRMaUPKwlw8rMeuGOq-840M7Is_13IfuKyn2oHlwTd1WQ9HWXfSy-jbfcOyryQ3JYfmKFs_5QceOPguXoizyjeRL9_iQrysfz7f3iWbp1_3tzebpEi1HRKj05ystiZTOUPuLRiNTJm2BeZYZhYV-G21VVBpNIiV18TaV-Stwaq0tBA_TnP3of87chxcW8eCm8Z33I_RGbSK0hQm-O0d3PVjmDaNDiGnzOR5NqHvHyFFoFRKQGZSq5MqQh9j4MrtQ936cHQK3L9HuNMjXGocuUdLU8fV29xx23L5358uT68_joLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301143037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans</title><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:Oxford Journal Archive: Access period 2024-2025</source><creator>Duncan, P W ; Studenski, S ; Chandler, J ; Prescott, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Duncan, P W ; Studenski, S ; Chandler, J ; Prescott, B</creatorcontrib><description>A new measure of balance, functional reach, has been recently developed. Functional reach is the maximal distance one can reach forward beyond arm's length while maintaining a fixed base of support in the standing position. Reliability, criterion, and concurrent construct validity of functional reach have been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive validity of functional reach in identifying elderly subjects at risk for recurrent falls. Two hundred and seventeen elderly, community-dwelling male veterans (aged 70-104) underwent baseline screening and were followed for 6 months to monitor falls. Subjects with two or more falls during the 6-month follow-up were classified as recurrent fallers. Logistic regression reveals that if individuals were unable to reach, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of having two falls was 8.07 (2.8-23.71); if their reach was less than or equal to 6 inches the OR was 4.02 (1.84-8.77); and if reach was greater than 6 inches but less than 10 inches the OR was 2.00 (1.35-2.98). The association between functional reach and recurrent falls was not confounded by age, depression, or cognition. We conclude that functional reach is a simple and easy-to-use clinical measure that has predictive validity in identifying recurrent falls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-3323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geronj/47.3.m93</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1573190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Gerontological Society</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Anatomy &amp; physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Older people ; Postural Balance ; Posture ; Recurrence ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of gerontology (Kirkwood), 1992-05, Vol.47 (3), p.M93-M98</ispartof><rights>Copyright Gerontological Society of America, Incorporated May 1992</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-754839597618e08a90752e3659c282d69210abfb10f52722fa53e5af3a972fd93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1573190$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duncan, P W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Studenski, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandler, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prescott, B</creatorcontrib><title>Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans</title><title>Journal of gerontology (Kirkwood)</title><addtitle>J Gerontol</addtitle><description>A new measure of balance, functional reach, has been recently developed. Functional reach is the maximal distance one can reach forward beyond arm's length while maintaining a fixed base of support in the standing position. Reliability, criterion, and concurrent construct validity of functional reach have been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive validity of functional reach in identifying elderly subjects at risk for recurrent falls. Two hundred and seventeen elderly, community-dwelling male veterans (aged 70-104) underwent baseline screening and were followed for 6 months to monitor falls. Subjects with two or more falls during the 6-month follow-up were classified as recurrent fallers. Logistic regression reveals that if individuals were unable to reach, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of having two falls was 8.07 (2.8-23.71); if their reach was less than or equal to 6 inches the OR was 4.02 (1.84-8.77); and if reach was greater than 6 inches but less than 10 inches the OR was 2.00 (1.35-2.98). The association between functional reach and recurrent falls was not confounded by age, depression, or cognition. We conclude that functional reach is a simple and easy-to-use clinical measure that has predictive validity in identifying recurrent falls.</description><subject>Accidental Falls</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anatomy &amp; physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0022-1422</issn><issn>2331-3323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10d1r20AMAPBjrKRZ2uc9FY4N9uZEJ_l8vr6VsqwtKX1pn4-LLW8O_sju7ED--3qkMCj0SUj8JJAkxFcFSwWWVr859N1ulZolLVtLn8QciVRChPRZzAEQE5UinosvMe4AFGaQzcRMaUPKwlw8rMeuGOq-840M7Is_13IfuKyn2oHlwTd1WQ9HWXfSy-jbfcOyryQ3JYfmKFs_5QceOPguXoizyjeRL9_iQrysfz7f3iWbp1_3tzebpEi1HRKj05ystiZTOUPuLRiNTJm2BeZYZhYV-G21VVBpNIiV18TaV-Stwaq0tBA_TnP3of87chxcW8eCm8Z33I_RGbSK0hQm-O0d3PVjmDaNDiGnzOR5NqHvHyFFoFRKQGZSq5MqQh9j4MrtQ936cHQK3L9HuNMjXGocuUdLU8fV29xx23L5358uT68_joLA</recordid><startdate>19920501</startdate><enddate>19920501</enddate><creator>Duncan, P W</creator><creator>Studenski, S</creator><creator>Chandler, J</creator><creator>Prescott, B</creator><general>Gerontological Society</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920501</creationdate><title>Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans</title><author>Duncan, P W ; Studenski, S ; Chandler, J ; Prescott, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-754839597618e08a90752e3659c282d69210abfb10f52722fa53e5af3a972fd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anatomy &amp; physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duncan, P W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Studenski, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandler, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prescott, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gerontology (Kirkwood)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duncan, P W</au><au>Studenski, S</au><au>Chandler, J</au><au>Prescott, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gerontology (Kirkwood)</jtitle><addtitle>J Gerontol</addtitle><date>1992-05-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>M93</spage><epage>M98</epage><pages>M93-M98</pages><issn>0022-1422</issn><eissn>2331-3323</eissn><abstract>A new measure of balance, functional reach, has been recently developed. Functional reach is the maximal distance one can reach forward beyond arm's length while maintaining a fixed base of support in the standing position. Reliability, criterion, and concurrent construct validity of functional reach have been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive validity of functional reach in identifying elderly subjects at risk for recurrent falls. Two hundred and seventeen elderly, community-dwelling male veterans (aged 70-104) underwent baseline screening and were followed for 6 months to monitor falls. Subjects with two or more falls during the 6-month follow-up were classified as recurrent fallers. Logistic regression reveals that if individuals were unable to reach, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of having two falls was 8.07 (2.8-23.71); if their reach was less than or equal to 6 inches the OR was 4.02 (1.84-8.77); and if reach was greater than 6 inches but less than 10 inches the OR was 2.00 (1.35-2.98). The association between functional reach and recurrent falls was not confounded by age, depression, or cognition. We conclude that functional reach is a simple and easy-to-use clinical measure that has predictive validity in identifying recurrent falls.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Gerontological Society</pub><pmid>1573190</pmid><doi>10.1093/geronj/47.3.m93</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1422
ispartof Journal of gerontology (Kirkwood), 1992-05, Vol.47 (3), p.M93-M98
issn 0022-1422
2331-3323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72913440
source Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:Oxford Journal Archive: Access period 2024-2025
subjects Accidental Falls
Age Factors
Aged
Anatomy & physiology
Humans
Male
Older people
Postural Balance
Posture
Recurrence
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Factors
title Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A04%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20reach:%20predictive%20validity%20in%20a%20sample%20of%20elderly%20male%20veterans&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gerontology%20(Kirkwood)&rft.au=Duncan,%20P%20W&rft.date=1992-05-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=M93&rft.epage=M98&rft.pages=M93-M98&rft.issn=0022-1422&rft.eissn=2331-3323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geronj/47.3.m93&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1301143037%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-754839597618e08a90752e3659c282d69210abfb10f52722fa53e5af3a972fd93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301143037&rft_id=info:pmid/1573190&rfr_iscdi=true