Loading…

Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 1178 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. The minimum follow‐up time was 3 years. The 10‐year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IB was 6% for tumors less than 3 cm, 15% for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer 1992-06, Vol.69 (11), p.2796-2806
Main Authors: Perez, Carlos A., Grigsby, Perry W., Nene, Shriram M., Camel, H. Marvin, Galakatos, Andrew, Kao, Ming‐Shian, Lockett, Mary Ann
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4167-4583538b7142ab85757e7ceb791e585292f0af8744238ba32f9ff626a73f46b43
container_end_page 2806
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2796
container_title Cancer
container_volume 69
creator Perez, Carlos A.
Grigsby, Perry W.
Nene, Shriram M.
Camel, H. Marvin
Galakatos, Andrew
Kao, Ming‐Shian
Lockett, Mary Ann
description The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 1178 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. The minimum follow‐up time was 3 years. The 10‐year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IB was 6% for tumors less than 3 cm, 15% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 30% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.0018). The 10‐year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IIA was 10% for tumors less than 3 cm, 28% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 20% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.09). Stage IIB unilateral nonbulky tumors (less than 5 cm) had a 20% pelvic failure rate compared with 28% for bilateral lesions and 35% for unilateral bulky tumors (more than 5 cm) (P = 0.35). In Stage IIB, pelvic failures were greater when disease extended into the lateral parametrium (30%) compared with medial parametrial involvement only (17%) (P = 0.01). In Stage III unilateral nonbulky tumors, the pelvic failure rate was 28% compared with 45% to 50% for unilateral bulky lesions (P = 0.002). Bilateral parametrial disease in Stage IIB did not increase the pelvic failure rate (21% in both subgroups) (P = 0.83), whereas in Stage III, bilateral parametrial involvement was associated with a 48% pelvic failure rate versus 28% for unilateral extension (P ≤ 0.01). Five‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) rates for IB tumors less than or equal to 3 cm was 90% versus 67% for tumors more than 3 cm (P = 0.01). In Stage IIA tumors less than or equal to 3 cm, 5‐year DFS was 70% versus 45% for tumors more than 3 cm. Patients with Stage IIB nonbulky tumors (less than or equal to 5 cm in diameter) had better 10‐year DFS (65% to 70%) compared with those with bilateral bulky tumors (45% to 55%) (P = 0.10). Stage I11 patients with unilateral nonbulky tumors had a 55% 10‐year DFS compared with 35% to 40% for bulky tumors or bilateral parametrial involvement (P = 0.002). The authors concluded that clinical stage and size of tumor are critical factors in the prognosis, therapy selection, and evaluation of results in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1097-0142(19920601)69:11<2796::AID-CNCR2820691127>3.0.CO;2-O
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72914489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72914489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4167-4583538b7142ab85757e7ceb791e585292f0af8744238ba32f9ff626a73f46b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV1rFDEYhYNY6lr9CUIuRPRi1nxOJqsIZVproTggCl4IIZN9s43MztRkxlp_vRl3reiF4FUI53kPh3MQOqFkSQlhzynRqiBUsKdUa0ZKQp-VekXpS6Z0uVodn58U9dv6Hauypill6hVfkmXdvGBFcwctbs_vogUhpCqk4B_vofspfc5fxSQ_RIdUKppvF2hz6j24EQ8ej9N2iDiF74CHHo-XgK_isOmHFNIsOxtd6Iet_clmdRohhh6wg_g1fMNjBDvCGl-H8RKHGO062DFkJ9sNPTxAB952CR7u3yP04fXp-_pNcdGcndfHF4UTtFSFkBWXvGpVzm_bSiqpQDlolaYgK8k088T6SgnBMmU589r7kpVWcS_KVvAj9GTnm7N_mSCNZhuSg66zPQxTMoppKkSlM_hpB7o4pBTBm6sYtjbeGErMvIOZizRzkebXDqbUhlIz72BM3sH8uYPhhpi6Mcw02f7RPsfUbmH923xXfNYf73WbnO18tL0L6RYTXEpNy4xtdth16ODmPyP-M-FfCv8BAd6ybw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72914489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Perez, Carlos A. ; Grigsby, Perry W. ; Nene, Shriram M. ; Camel, H. Marvin ; Galakatos, Andrew ; Kao, Ming‐Shian ; Lockett, Mary Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Perez, Carlos A. ; Grigsby, Perry W. ; Nene, Shriram M. ; Camel, H. Marvin ; Galakatos, Andrew ; Kao, Ming‐Shian ; Lockett, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><description>The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 1178 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. The minimum follow‐up time was 3 years. The 10‐year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IB was 6% for tumors less than 3 cm, 15% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 30% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.0018). The 10‐year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IIA was 10% for tumors less than 3 cm, 28% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 20% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.09). Stage IIB unilateral nonbulky tumors (less than 5 cm) had a 20% pelvic failure rate compared with 28% for bilateral lesions and 35% for unilateral bulky tumors (more than 5 cm) (P = 0.35). In Stage IIB, pelvic failures were greater when disease extended into the lateral parametrium (30%) compared with medial parametrial involvement only (17%) (P = 0.01). In Stage III unilateral nonbulky tumors, the pelvic failure rate was 28% compared with 45% to 50% for unilateral bulky lesions (P = 0.002). Bilateral parametrial disease in Stage IIB did not increase the pelvic failure rate (21% in both subgroups) (P = 0.83), whereas in Stage III, bilateral parametrial involvement was associated with a 48% pelvic failure rate versus 28% for unilateral extension (P ≤ 0.01). Five‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) rates for IB tumors less than or equal to 3 cm was 90% versus 67% for tumors more than 3 cm (P = 0.01). In Stage IIA tumors less than or equal to 3 cm, 5‐year DFS was 70% versus 45% for tumors more than 3 cm. Patients with Stage IIB nonbulky tumors (less than or equal to 5 cm in diameter) had better 10‐year DFS (65% to 70%) compared with those with bilateral bulky tumors (45% to 55%) (P = 0.10). Stage I11 patients with unilateral nonbulky tumors had a 55% 10‐year DFS compared with 35% to 40% for bulky tumors or bilateral parametrial involvement (P = 0.002). The authors concluded that clinical stage and size of tumor are critical factors in the prognosis, therapy selection, and evaluation of results in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920601)69:11&lt;2796::AID-CNCR2820691127&gt;3.0.CO;2-O</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1571911</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Medical sciences ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 1992-06, Vol.69 (11), p.2796-2806</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1992 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4167-4583538b7142ab85757e7ceb791e585292f0af8744238ba32f9ff626a73f46b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4355916$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1571911$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perez, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigsby, Perry W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nene, Shriram M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camel, H. Marvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galakatos, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Ming‐Shian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockett, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 1178 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. The minimum follow‐up time was 3 years. The 10‐year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IB was 6% for tumors less than 3 cm, 15% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 30% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.0018). The 10‐year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IIA was 10% for tumors less than 3 cm, 28% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 20% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.09). Stage IIB unilateral nonbulky tumors (less than 5 cm) had a 20% pelvic failure rate compared with 28% for bilateral lesions and 35% for unilateral bulky tumors (more than 5 cm) (P = 0.35). In Stage IIB, pelvic failures were greater when disease extended into the lateral parametrium (30%) compared with medial parametrial involvement only (17%) (P = 0.01). In Stage III unilateral nonbulky tumors, the pelvic failure rate was 28% compared with 45% to 50% for unilateral bulky lesions (P = 0.002). Bilateral parametrial disease in Stage IIB did not increase the pelvic failure rate (21% in both subgroups) (P = 0.83), whereas in Stage III, bilateral parametrial involvement was associated with a 48% pelvic failure rate versus 28% for unilateral extension (P ≤ 0.01). Five‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) rates for IB tumors less than or equal to 3 cm was 90% versus 67% for tumors more than 3 cm (P = 0.01). In Stage IIA tumors less than or equal to 3 cm, 5‐year DFS was 70% versus 45% for tumors more than 3 cm. Patients with Stage IIB nonbulky tumors (less than or equal to 5 cm in diameter) had better 10‐year DFS (65% to 70%) compared with those with bilateral bulky tumors (45% to 55%) (P = 0.10). Stage I11 patients with unilateral nonbulky tumors had a 55% 10‐year DFS compared with 35% to 40% for bulky tumors or bilateral parametrial involvement (P = 0.002). The authors concluded that clinical stage and size of tumor are critical factors in the prognosis, therapy selection, and evaluation of results in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkV1rFDEYhYNY6lr9CUIuRPRi1nxOJqsIZVproTggCl4IIZN9s43MztRkxlp_vRl3reiF4FUI53kPh3MQOqFkSQlhzynRqiBUsKdUa0ZKQp-VekXpS6Z0uVodn58U9dv6Hauypill6hVfkmXdvGBFcwctbs_vogUhpCqk4B_vofspfc5fxSQ_RIdUKppvF2hz6j24EQ8ej9N2iDiF74CHHo-XgK_isOmHFNIsOxtd6Iet_clmdRohhh6wg_g1fMNjBDvCGl-H8RKHGO062DFkJ9sNPTxAB952CR7u3yP04fXp-_pNcdGcndfHF4UTtFSFkBWXvGpVzm_bSiqpQDlolaYgK8k088T6SgnBMmU589r7kpVWcS_KVvAj9GTnm7N_mSCNZhuSg66zPQxTMoppKkSlM_hpB7o4pBTBm6sYtjbeGErMvIOZizRzkebXDqbUhlIz72BM3sH8uYPhhpi6Mcw02f7RPsfUbmH923xXfNYf73WbnO18tL0L6RYTXEpNy4xtdth16ODmPyP-M-FfCv8BAd6ybw</recordid><startdate>19920601</startdate><enddate>19920601</enddate><creator>Perez, Carlos A.</creator><creator>Grigsby, Perry W.</creator><creator>Nene, Shriram M.</creator><creator>Camel, H. Marvin</creator><creator>Galakatos, Andrew</creator><creator>Kao, Ming‐Shian</creator><creator>Lockett, Mary Ann</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920601</creationdate><title>Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone</title><author>Perez, Carlos A. ; Grigsby, Perry W. ; Nene, Shriram M. ; Camel, H. Marvin ; Galakatos, Andrew ; Kao, Ming‐Shian ; Lockett, Mary Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4167-4583538b7142ab85757e7ceb791e585292f0af8744238ba32f9ff626a73f46b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perez, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigsby, Perry W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nene, Shriram M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camel, H. Marvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galakatos, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Ming‐Shian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockett, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perez, Carlos A.</au><au>Grigsby, Perry W.</au><au>Nene, Shriram M.</au><au>Camel, H. Marvin</au><au>Galakatos, Andrew</au><au>Kao, Ming‐Shian</au><au>Lockett, Mary Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>1992-06-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2796</spage><epage>2806</epage><pages>2796-2806</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 1178 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. The minimum follow‐up time was 3 years. The 10‐year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IB was 6% for tumors less than 3 cm, 15% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 30% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.0018). The 10‐year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IIA was 10% for tumors less than 3 cm, 28% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 20% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.09). Stage IIB unilateral nonbulky tumors (less than 5 cm) had a 20% pelvic failure rate compared with 28% for bilateral lesions and 35% for unilateral bulky tumors (more than 5 cm) (P = 0.35). In Stage IIB, pelvic failures were greater when disease extended into the lateral parametrium (30%) compared with medial parametrial involvement only (17%) (P = 0.01). In Stage III unilateral nonbulky tumors, the pelvic failure rate was 28% compared with 45% to 50% for unilateral bulky lesions (P = 0.002). Bilateral parametrial disease in Stage IIB did not increase the pelvic failure rate (21% in both subgroups) (P = 0.83), whereas in Stage III, bilateral parametrial involvement was associated with a 48% pelvic failure rate versus 28% for unilateral extension (P ≤ 0.01). Five‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) rates for IB tumors less than or equal to 3 cm was 90% versus 67% for tumors more than 3 cm (P = 0.01). In Stage IIA tumors less than or equal to 3 cm, 5‐year DFS was 70% versus 45% for tumors more than 3 cm. Patients with Stage IIB nonbulky tumors (less than or equal to 5 cm in diameter) had better 10‐year DFS (65% to 70%) compared with those with bilateral bulky tumors (45% to 55%) (P = 0.10). Stage I11 patients with unilateral nonbulky tumors had a 55% 10‐year DFS compared with 35% to 40% for bulky tumors or bilateral parametrial involvement (P = 0.002). The authors concluded that clinical stage and size of tumor are critical factors in the prognosis, therapy selection, and evaluation of results in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>1571911</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-0142(19920601)69:11&lt;2796::AID-CNCR2820691127&gt;3.0.CO;2-O</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 1992-06, Vol.69 (11), p.2796-2806
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72914489
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Age Factors
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Genital system. Mammary gland
Humans
Lymphatic Metastasis
Medical sciences
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Retrospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy
title Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A36%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20tumor%20size%20on%20the%20prognosis%20of%20carcinoma%20of%20the%20uterine%20cervix%20treated%20with%20irradiation%20alone&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Perez,%20Carlos%20A.&rft.date=1992-06-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2796&rft.epage=2806&rft.pages=2796-2806&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19920601)69:11%3C2796::AID-CNCR2820691127%3E3.0.CO;2-O&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72914489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4167-4583538b7142ab85757e7ceb791e585292f0af8744238ba32f9ff626a73f46b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72914489&rft_id=info:pmid/1571911&rfr_iscdi=true