Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists, family physicians and patients with kidney failure toward primary care delivery for chronic dialysis patients

• Published in: Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2003-02, Vol.18 (2), p.305-309
• Main Authors: Zimmerman, Deborah L., Selick, Avrum, Singh, Rajinder, Mendelssohn, David C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis. Health state; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy; Attitude of Health Personnel; Attitude to Health; Biological and medical sciences; Canada; Delivery of Health Care; Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management; Epidemiology; General aspects; haemodialysis; Humans; Intensive care medicine; Medical sciences; Nephrology; Patients - psychology; Peritoneal Dialysis; Physicians - psychology; Physicians, Family - psychology; primary care; Primary Health Care; Public health. Hygiene; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency - therapy; survey; Time Factors
• ISSN: 0931-0509; 1460-2385; 1460-2385
• DOI: 10.1093/ndt/18.2.305

Background. Nephrologists have traditionally assumed responsibility for both nephrological and primary care health problems of their dialysis patients. However, given the increasing limitations of nephrology human resources, there is concern that traditional models may fall short of providing comprehensive care. Methods. We studied this issue by distributing three different self‐administered surveys to 361 members of the Canadian Society of Nephrology, 325 family physicians, and 163 chronic dialysis patients. Results. The overall response rate was 61.3% for nephrologists, 51% for family physicians, and 90% for patients. More than 50% of Canadian nephrologists are spending approximately one‐third of their time in primary care delivery. The majority of these nephrologists and family physicians agree that nephrologists should not be solely responsible for the primary care of patients on dialysis. Yet, both groups of physicians have concerns that family physicians do not have the knowledge/training and time to care for this complicated group of patients. The patients themselves have more confidence in the primary care that is delivered by their family physicians than by their nephrologists. Unfortunately, there is little communication between the two physician groups either between themselves or with their patients about the services that should be provided by their nephrologist or their family physician. Conclusion. Nephrologists and family physicians agree that more primary care for dialysis patients should be provided by family physicians. However, the lack of communication between physicians and patients may result in either a duplication or omission of services that are required by this patient population. Dialysis delivery systems in Canada must evolve to ensure that comprehensive chronic dialysis and primary care is provided to these patients through cooperation and communication with primary care physicians.