The antitumor effects of the quinoline-3-carboxamide linomide on dunning R-3327 rat prostatic cancers

• Published in: Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 1992-06, Vol.52 (11), p.3022-3028
• Main Authors: ICHIKAWA, T, LAM, J. C, CHRISTENSEN, P. I, HARTLEY-ASP, B, ISAACS, J. T
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adjuvants, Immunologic - therapeutic use; Animals; Antineoplastic agents; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use; Biological and medical sciences; Cell Division; Cell Line; Chemotherapy; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Hydroxyquinolines - pharmacology; Hydroxyquinolines - therapeutic use; Killer Cells, Natural - drug effects; Killer Cells, Natural - immunology; Lung Neoplasms - pathology; Lung Neoplasms - prevention & control; Lung Neoplasms - secondary; Male; Medical sciences; Neoplasm Transplantation; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Spleen - immunology; Tumor Cells, Cultured
• ISSN: 0008-5472; 1538-7445

Linomide (N-phenylmethyl-1,2-dihydro-4-hydroxyl-1-methyl-2-oxo-quinoline-3- carboxamide) is a quinoline 3-carboxamide which previously has been demonstrated to produce immunomodulator and antitumor effects when given in vivo. To test the possible antitumor effects of linomide against prostatic cancers, rats bearing five distinct Dunning R-3327 rat prostatic cancer sublines were treated daily with i.p. injections of linomide. These studies demonstrated that linomide has a reproducible antitumor effect against all of the prostatic cancers tested regardless of their growth rate, degree of morphologic differentiation, metastatic ability, or androgen responsiveness. This antitumor effect is observed only in vivo, not in vitro, and involves a cytotoxic response of the prostatic cancer cells. This cytotoxic response results in the retardation of the growth rate (i.e., increased tumor volume doubling time) of primary prostatic cancers and in metastatic lesions. Linomide's growth retardation is reversible, and thus continuous daily treatment with linomide is required for maximal antitumor response. Pretreatment of rats with linomide before tumor inoculation has no effect in addition to that produced by initiating linomide treatment at the time of tumor inoculation. No enhancement of either natural killer cell number or natural killer cell cytotoxic activity is induced by linomide treatment in the tumor-bearing rats. In addition, depletion of natural killer cell activity via injections of asialo-GM1 antiserum does not prevent the antitumor effects of linomide in vivo. Likewise, the antitumor effects of linomide are also produced in prostatic cancer-bearing athymic nude rats. These results suggest that the requirement for host involvement in the antitumor effects of linomide against rat prostatic cancers may involve both immune and nonimmune host mechanism(s) (e.g., antiangiogenesis).