Liquid supplement and forage intake by range beef cows

• Published in: Journal of animal science 2003, Vol.81 (1), p.294-303
• Main Authors: Sowell, B.F, Bowman, J.G.P, Grings, E.E, MacNeil, M.D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age Factors; Animal Feed; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; Animal productions; Animals; Beef; beef cows; Biological and medical sciences; blood; blood chemistry; Blood Urea Nitrogen; body condition; Body Constitution; Cattle; Cattle - physiology; crude protein; Dietary Supplements; digestibility; Digestion - drug effects; dry matter intake; Eating; feed supplements; feeding behavior; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; grazing; pastures; Pregnancy; Random Allocation; restricted feeding; Terrestrial animal productions; urea; urea nitrogen; Vertebrates
• ISSN: 0021-8812; 1525-3163
• DOI: 10.2527/2003.811294x

One hundred eighty crossbred cows were assigned to one of six native range pastures during two winters to evaluate forage and supplement intake as affected by liquid supplement (yr 1: 50% crude protein, 84% from urea; yr 2: 57% crude protein, 91% from urea) delivery method and cow age (2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 yr). Treatments were: 1) no supplement (Control); 2) a lick-wheel feeder containing liquid supplement (ADLIB); and 3) a computer-controlled lick-wheel feeder that dispensed 0.9 kgcow-1d-1 of liquid supplement (average 0.5 kg of dry mattercow-1d-1; Restricted). Each treatment was applied to two pastures. Forage digestibility was increased (P = 0.03) by supplementation. Supplemented cows lost less (P = 0.05) body condition than unsupplemented cows (average -0.3 vs -0.6). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was highest (P = 0.001) for ADLIB (8.7 mg/dL), intermediate for Restricted (6.2 mg/dL), and lowest for Control (2.3 mg/dL). Forage DMI was 31% higher (P = 0.01) in 1995 than in 1996, and was increased (P = 0.02) by supplementation both years. Cows supplemented with ADLIB consumed 23% more forage dry matter than Control cows, whereas Restricted cows consumed 21% more dry matter than ADLIB cows. Supplement intake by cows on ADLIB was greater (P = 0.001) than by cows on Restricted in both years. Supplement intake was lowest (P = 0.002) by 2-yr-old cows, intermediate by 3-yr-olds, and greatest by 4-, 5-, and 6-yr-old cows. Variation in supplement intake by individual cows was higher (P = 0.09) for cows in the Restricted treatment (coefficient of variation [CV] = 117%) than those on ADLIB (CV = 68%) during the first year, but did not differ between supplement treatments (average CV = 62%) in the second year. The proportions of cows consuming less than 0.3 kg/d of supplement dry matter intake (DMI) and consuming less than the target amount of supplement (0.5 kg DMI) were less (P = 0.001) for ADLIB than for Restricted during both years. ADLIB cows spent more (P = 0.001) time at the supplement feeder and had more (P < 0.002) supplement feeding bouts than Restricted cows during both years. During the first year, 2- and 3-yr-old cows spent less (P < 0.01) time at the feeder and had fewer feeding bouts per day than 6-yr-old cows. Age had no effect (P > 0.24) on feeding behavior during the second year. Supplementation of beef cows grazing winter range with 50 to 57% crude protein liquid supplement increased forage digestibility and intake. Restricting supplement access increased