Loading…

The value of anal endosonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging following the repair of anorectal malformations

Surgery for anorectal malformations (ARMs) attempts to position the neo-anus anatomically within the anal sphincter complex. Currently, MRI is the imaging modality of choice in determining the position of the neo-anus after reconstructive surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric radiology 2003-03, Vol.33 (3), p.183-185
Main Authors: JONES, Niall M, SMILGIN HUMPHREYS, M, GOODMAN, Thomas R, SULLIVAN, Peter B, GRANT, Hugh W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Surgery for anorectal malformations (ARMs) attempts to position the neo-anus anatomically within the anal sphincter complex. Currently, MRI is the imaging modality of choice in determining the position of the neo-anus after reconstructive surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of anal endosonography (AES) with conventional MRI in demonstrating the anatomy of the neo-anus following repair of ARMs. Fourteen children (ten girls, four boys), born with ARMs (four low, ten high) underwent both AES and pelvic MRI following anorectoplasty. The results of both investigations were compared with muscle stimulation and were reported blindly by a clinician and a radiologist. AES findings were comparable with MRI in 9 of the 14 cases. In four cases, MRI and AES findings differed, with nerve stimulation supporting AES but not MRI. AES is an accurate alternative to MRI in the assessment of anorectoplasty. It provides more detailed information and can be performed under anaesthesia in combination with a surgical procedure.
ISSN:0301-0449
1432-1998
DOI:10.1007/s00247-002-0841-1