Loading…
Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period by comparing thermodilution with Doppler methods. Design: Prospective and blinded human trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Thirty adult patients undergoing e...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2003-04, Vol.17 (2), p.193-198 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3 |
container_end_page | 198 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Zhao, Xiaoqin Mashikian, John S. Panzica, Pete Lerner, Adam Park, Kyung W. Comunale, Mark E. |
description | Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period by comparing thermodilution with Doppler methods. Design: Prospective and blinded human trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Thirty adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Measurements and Main Results: Thermodilution CO (TCO) was obtained in triplicate. Doppler CO (DCO) in triplicate was obtained at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic valve (AV), and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). CO measurements were made (1) before CPB (baseline), (2) immediately after CPB, (3) 15 minutes after CPB, and (4) 30 minutes after CPB. Before CPB, the DCO at LVOT, RVOT, and AV showed good correlations (r = 0.87, r = 0.88, and r = 0.84, respectively) with TCO. Bias analysis showed no significant difference among TCO and 3 DCOs (p > 0.05 each). Correlation between DCO and TCO decreased but remained significant after CPB (r between 0.57 and 0.85, p < 0.001). The bias among TCO and each of the DCOs at the LVOT, RVOT, and AV increased immediately after CPB (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively) and remained significant at 15 minutes and 30 minutes post-CPB except for DCO at the AV. TCO exceeded DCO by 0.44 to 0.72 L/min immediately after CPB. The CO measured by both thermodilution and Doppler methods gradually decreased over time post-CPB. The decrease in CO was significant at 30 minutes post-CPB (p < 0.01). Conclusion: This study adds further support that DCO is a clinically acceptable method to accurately assess the CO in patients even during periods of uneven regional body temperatures as may occur in the early post-CPB period. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/jcan.2003.46 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73190308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053077003000211</els_id><sourcerecordid>73190308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtr3DAURkVpaB7truuiTbuKp3rbXpZpXhDIJl0LjXRNFWRLlezCQH585M5AoGR1L_c7fFwOQp8p2VAi-fcna6YNI4RvhHqHzqjkrOkEY-_rXvOGtC05ReelPBFCqZTtB3RKmeo7QegZet7GMZnsS5xwHPD8G_IYnQ_L7OtlF8NSsDXZeWNxXOa0zNhMDv-MKQXI_0d-WhswmBz2OMUyN_-AmJYwxsnkPd7tkykFJ8g-uo_oZDChwKfjvEC_rq8et7fN_cPN3fbHfWO5EnPTEimEMI4x1qmeOT5Az5QQxAywa4XsbCeN7JVrZc-oskoS6QTr-CBryoBfoG-H3pTjnwXKrEdfLIRgJohL0S2nPeGkq-DlAbQ5lpJh0Cn7sf6tKdGrTb3a1qttLVTFvxx7l90I7hU-6q3A1yNgijVhyGayvrxyouWSybVIHTioFv56yLpYD5MF5zPYWbvo3_7gBcY4nB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73190308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Zhao, Xiaoqin ; Mashikian, John S. ; Panzica, Pete ; Lerner, Adam ; Park, Kyung W. ; Comunale, Mark E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoqin ; Mashikian, John S. ; Panzica, Pete ; Lerner, Adam ; Park, Kyung W. ; Comunale, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period by comparing thermodilution with Doppler methods. Design: Prospective and blinded human trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Thirty adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Measurements and Main Results: Thermodilution CO (TCO) was obtained in triplicate. Doppler CO (DCO) in triplicate was obtained at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic valve (AV), and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). CO measurements were made (1) before CPB (baseline), (2) immediately after CPB, (3) 15 minutes after CPB, and (4) 30 minutes after CPB. Before CPB, the DCO at LVOT, RVOT, and AV showed good correlations (r = 0.87, r = 0.88, and r = 0.84, respectively) with TCO. Bias analysis showed no significant difference among TCO and 3 DCOs (p > 0.05 each). Correlation between DCO and TCO decreased but remained significant after CPB (r between 0.57 and 0.85, p < 0.001). The bias among TCO and each of the DCOs at the LVOT, RVOT, and AV increased immediately after CPB (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively) and remained significant at 15 minutes and 30 minutes post-CPB except for DCO at the AV. TCO exceeded DCO by 0.44 to 0.72 L/min immediately after CPB. The CO measured by both thermodilution and Doppler methods gradually decreased over time post-CPB. The decrease in CO was significant at 30 minutes post-CPB (p < 0.01). Conclusion: This study adds further support that DCO is a clinically acceptable method to accurately assess the CO in patients even during periods of uneven regional body temperatures as may occur in the early post-CPB period. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0770</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2003.46</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12698401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia depending on type of surgery ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve - physiology ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; cardiac output ; Cardiac Output - physiology ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Coronary Artery Bypass ; Echocardiography, Doppler - statistics & numerical data ; Echocardiography, Transesophageal - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; overestimation ; post-cardiopulmonary bypass ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Regression Analysis ; Thermodilution - statistics & numerical data ; Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass ; Time Factors ; Ventricular Function - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2003-04, Vol.17 (2), p.193-198</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14735256$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12698401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mashikian, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzica, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyung W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comunale, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period</title><title>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><description>Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period by comparing thermodilution with Doppler methods. Design: Prospective and blinded human trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Thirty adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Measurements and Main Results: Thermodilution CO (TCO) was obtained in triplicate. Doppler CO (DCO) in triplicate was obtained at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic valve (AV), and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). CO measurements were made (1) before CPB (baseline), (2) immediately after CPB, (3) 15 minutes after CPB, and (4) 30 minutes after CPB. Before CPB, the DCO at LVOT, RVOT, and AV showed good correlations (r = 0.87, r = 0.88, and r = 0.84, respectively) with TCO. Bias analysis showed no significant difference among TCO and 3 DCOs (p > 0.05 each). Correlation between DCO and TCO decreased but remained significant after CPB (r between 0.57 and 0.85, p < 0.001). The bias among TCO and each of the DCOs at the LVOT, RVOT, and AV increased immediately after CPB (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively) and remained significant at 15 minutes and 30 minutes post-CPB except for DCO at the AV. TCO exceeded DCO by 0.44 to 0.72 L/min immediately after CPB. The CO measured by both thermodilution and Doppler methods gradually decreased over time post-CPB. The decrease in CO was significant at 30 minutes post-CPB (p < 0.01). Conclusion: This study adds further support that DCO is a clinically acceptable method to accurately assess the CO in patients even during periods of uneven regional body temperatures as may occur in the early post-CPB period. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - physiology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cardiac output</subject><subject>Cardiac Output - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Transesophageal - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>overestimation</subject><subject>post-cardiopulmonary bypass</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Thermodilution - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ventricular Function - physiology</subject><issn>1053-0770</issn><issn>1532-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkEtr3DAURkVpaB7truuiTbuKp3rbXpZpXhDIJl0LjXRNFWRLlezCQH585M5AoGR1L_c7fFwOQp8p2VAi-fcna6YNI4RvhHqHzqjkrOkEY-_rXvOGtC05ReelPBFCqZTtB3RKmeo7QegZet7GMZnsS5xwHPD8G_IYnQ_L7OtlF8NSsDXZeWNxXOa0zNhMDv-MKQXI_0d-WhswmBz2OMUyN_-AmJYwxsnkPd7tkykFJ8g-uo_oZDChwKfjvEC_rq8et7fN_cPN3fbHfWO5EnPTEimEMI4x1qmeOT5Az5QQxAywa4XsbCeN7JVrZc-oskoS6QTr-CBryoBfoG-H3pTjnwXKrEdfLIRgJohL0S2nPeGkq-DlAbQ5lpJh0Cn7sf6tKdGrTb3a1qttLVTFvxx7l90I7hU-6q3A1yNgijVhyGayvrxyouWSybVIHTioFv56yLpYD5MF5zPYWbvo3_7gBcY4nB8</recordid><startdate>20030401</startdate><enddate>20030401</enddate><creator>Zhao, Xiaoqin</creator><creator>Mashikian, John S.</creator><creator>Panzica, Pete</creator><creator>Lerner, Adam</creator><creator>Park, Kyung W.</creator><creator>Comunale, Mark E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030401</creationdate><title>Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period</title><author>Zhao, Xiaoqin ; Mashikian, John S. ; Panzica, Pete ; Lerner, Adam ; Park, Kyung W. ; Comunale, Mark E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - physiology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cardiac output</topic><topic>Cardiac Output - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Transesophageal - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>overestimation</topic><topic>post-cardiopulmonary bypass</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Thermodilution - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ventricular Function - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mashikian, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzica, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyung W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comunale, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Xiaoqin</au><au>Mashikian, John S.</au><au>Panzica, Pete</au><au>Lerner, Adam</au><au>Park, Kyung W.</au><au>Comunale, Mark E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><date>2003-04-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>193-198</pages><issn>1053-0770</issn><eissn>1532-8422</eissn><abstract>Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period by comparing thermodilution with Doppler methods. Design: Prospective and blinded human trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Thirty adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Measurements and Main Results: Thermodilution CO (TCO) was obtained in triplicate. Doppler CO (DCO) in triplicate was obtained at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic valve (AV), and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). CO measurements were made (1) before CPB (baseline), (2) immediately after CPB, (3) 15 minutes after CPB, and (4) 30 minutes after CPB. Before CPB, the DCO at LVOT, RVOT, and AV showed good correlations (r = 0.87, r = 0.88, and r = 0.84, respectively) with TCO. Bias analysis showed no significant difference among TCO and 3 DCOs (p > 0.05 each). Correlation between DCO and TCO decreased but remained significant after CPB (r between 0.57 and 0.85, p < 0.001). The bias among TCO and each of the DCOs at the LVOT, RVOT, and AV increased immediately after CPB (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively) and remained significant at 15 minutes and 30 minutes post-CPB except for DCO at the AV. TCO exceeded DCO by 0.44 to 0.72 L/min immediately after CPB. The CO measured by both thermodilution and Doppler methods gradually decreased over time post-CPB. The decrease in CO was significant at 30 minutes post-CPB (p < 0.01). Conclusion: This study adds further support that DCO is a clinically acceptable method to accurately assess the CO in patients even during periods of uneven regional body temperatures as may occur in the early post-CPB period. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12698401</pmid><doi>10.1053/jcan.2003.46</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-0770 |
ispartof | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2003-04, Vol.17 (2), p.193-198 |
issn | 1053-0770 1532-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73190308 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Aged Anesthesia Anesthesia depending on type of surgery Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging Aortic Valve - physiology Bias Biological and medical sciences cardiac output Cardiac Output - physiology Cardiopulmonary Bypass Coronary Artery Bypass Echocardiography, Doppler - statistics & numerical data Echocardiography, Transesophageal - statistics & numerical data Female Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging Humans Male Medical sciences overestimation post-cardiopulmonary bypass Postoperative Period Prospective Studies Regression Analysis Thermodilution - statistics & numerical data Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass Time Factors Ventricular Function - physiology |
title | Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A39%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20thermodilution%20bolus%20cardiac%20output%20and%20Doppler%20cardiac%20output%20in%20the%20early%20post-cardiopulmonary%20bypass%20period&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiothoracic%20and%20vascular%20anesthesia&rft.au=Zhao,%20Xiaoqin&rft.date=2003-04-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=193-198&rft.issn=1053-0770&rft.eissn=1532-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/jcan.2003.46&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73190308%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73190308&rft_id=info:pmid/12698401&rfr_iscdi=true |