Loading…

Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period by comparing thermodilution with Doppler methods. Design: Prospective and blinded human trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Thirty adult patients undergoing e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2003-04, Vol.17 (2), p.193-198
Main Authors: Zhao, Xiaoqin, Mashikian, John S., Panzica, Pete, Lerner, Adam, Park, Kyung W., Comunale, Mark E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3
container_end_page 198
container_issue 2
container_start_page 193
container_title Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
container_volume 17
creator Zhao, Xiaoqin
Mashikian, John S.
Panzica, Pete
Lerner, Adam
Park, Kyung W.
Comunale, Mark E.
description Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period by comparing thermodilution with Doppler methods. Design: Prospective and blinded human trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Thirty adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Measurements and Main Results: Thermodilution CO (TCO) was obtained in triplicate. Doppler CO (DCO) in triplicate was obtained at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic valve (AV), and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). CO measurements were made (1) before CPB (baseline), (2) immediately after CPB, (3) 15 minutes after CPB, and (4) 30 minutes after CPB. Before CPB, the DCO at LVOT, RVOT, and AV showed good correlations (r = 0.87, r = 0.88, and r = 0.84, respectively) with TCO. Bias analysis showed no significant difference among TCO and 3 DCOs (p > 0.05 each). Correlation between DCO and TCO decreased but remained significant after CPB (r between 0.57 and 0.85, p < 0.001). The bias among TCO and each of the DCOs at the LVOT, RVOT, and AV increased immediately after CPB (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively) and remained significant at 15 minutes and 30 minutes post-CPB except for DCO at the AV. TCO exceeded DCO by 0.44 to 0.72 L/min immediately after CPB. The CO measured by both thermodilution and Doppler methods gradually decreased over time post-CPB. The decrease in CO was significant at 30 minutes post-CPB (p < 0.01). Conclusion: This study adds further support that DCO is a clinically acceptable method to accurately assess the CO in patients even during periods of uneven regional body temperatures as may occur in the early post-CPB period. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/jcan.2003.46
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73190308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053077003000211</els_id><sourcerecordid>73190308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtr3DAURkVpaB7truuiTbuKp3rbXpZpXhDIJl0LjXRNFWRLlezCQH585M5AoGR1L_c7fFwOQp8p2VAi-fcna6YNI4RvhHqHzqjkrOkEY-_rXvOGtC05ReelPBFCqZTtB3RKmeo7QegZet7GMZnsS5xwHPD8G_IYnQ_L7OtlF8NSsDXZeWNxXOa0zNhMDv-MKQXI_0d-WhswmBz2OMUyN_-AmJYwxsnkPd7tkykFJ8g-uo_oZDChwKfjvEC_rq8et7fN_cPN3fbHfWO5EnPTEimEMI4x1qmeOT5Az5QQxAywa4XsbCeN7JVrZc-oskoS6QTr-CBryoBfoG-H3pTjnwXKrEdfLIRgJohL0S2nPeGkq-DlAbQ5lpJh0Cn7sf6tKdGrTb3a1qttLVTFvxx7l90I7hU-6q3A1yNgijVhyGayvrxyouWSybVIHTioFv56yLpYD5MF5zPYWbvo3_7gBcY4nB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73190308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Zhao, Xiaoqin ; Mashikian, John S. ; Panzica, Pete ; Lerner, Adam ; Park, Kyung W. ; Comunale, Mark E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoqin ; Mashikian, John S. ; Panzica, Pete ; Lerner, Adam ; Park, Kyung W. ; Comunale, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period by comparing thermodilution with Doppler methods. Design: Prospective and blinded human trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Thirty adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Measurements and Main Results: Thermodilution CO (TCO) was obtained in triplicate. Doppler CO (DCO) in triplicate was obtained at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic valve (AV), and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). CO measurements were made (1) before CPB (baseline), (2) immediately after CPB, (3) 15 minutes after CPB, and (4) 30 minutes after CPB. Before CPB, the DCO at LVOT, RVOT, and AV showed good correlations (r = 0.87, r = 0.88, and r = 0.84, respectively) with TCO. Bias analysis showed no significant difference among TCO and 3 DCOs (p &gt; 0.05 each). Correlation between DCO and TCO decreased but remained significant after CPB (r between 0.57 and 0.85, p &lt; 0.001). The bias among TCO and each of the DCOs at the LVOT, RVOT, and AV increased immediately after CPB (p &lt; 0.01, p &lt; 0.01, and p &lt; 0.05, respectively) and remained significant at 15 minutes and 30 minutes post-CPB except for DCO at the AV. TCO exceeded DCO by 0.44 to 0.72 L/min immediately after CPB. The CO measured by both thermodilution and Doppler methods gradually decreased over time post-CPB. The decrease in CO was significant at 30 minutes post-CPB (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: This study adds further support that DCO is a clinically acceptable method to accurately assess the CO in patients even during periods of uneven regional body temperatures as may occur in the early post-CPB period. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0770</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2003.46</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12698401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia depending on type of surgery ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve - physiology ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; cardiac output ; Cardiac Output - physiology ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Coronary Artery Bypass ; Echocardiography, Doppler - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Echocardiography, Transesophageal - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; overestimation ; post-cardiopulmonary bypass ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Regression Analysis ; Thermodilution - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass ; Time Factors ; Ventricular Function - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2003-04, Vol.17 (2), p.193-198</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14735256$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12698401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mashikian, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzica, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyung W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comunale, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period</title><title>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><description>Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period by comparing thermodilution with Doppler methods. Design: Prospective and blinded human trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Thirty adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Measurements and Main Results: Thermodilution CO (TCO) was obtained in triplicate. Doppler CO (DCO) in triplicate was obtained at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic valve (AV), and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). CO measurements were made (1) before CPB (baseline), (2) immediately after CPB, (3) 15 minutes after CPB, and (4) 30 minutes after CPB. Before CPB, the DCO at LVOT, RVOT, and AV showed good correlations (r = 0.87, r = 0.88, and r = 0.84, respectively) with TCO. Bias analysis showed no significant difference among TCO and 3 DCOs (p &gt; 0.05 each). Correlation between DCO and TCO decreased but remained significant after CPB (r between 0.57 and 0.85, p &lt; 0.001). The bias among TCO and each of the DCOs at the LVOT, RVOT, and AV increased immediately after CPB (p &lt; 0.01, p &lt; 0.01, and p &lt; 0.05, respectively) and remained significant at 15 minutes and 30 minutes post-CPB except for DCO at the AV. TCO exceeded DCO by 0.44 to 0.72 L/min immediately after CPB. The CO measured by both thermodilution and Doppler methods gradually decreased over time post-CPB. The decrease in CO was significant at 30 minutes post-CPB (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: This study adds further support that DCO is a clinically acceptable method to accurately assess the CO in patients even during periods of uneven regional body temperatures as may occur in the early post-CPB period. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - physiology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cardiac output</subject><subject>Cardiac Output - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Transesophageal - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>overestimation</subject><subject>post-cardiopulmonary bypass</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Thermodilution - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ventricular Function - physiology</subject><issn>1053-0770</issn><issn>1532-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkEtr3DAURkVpaB7truuiTbuKp3rbXpZpXhDIJl0LjXRNFWRLlezCQH585M5AoGR1L_c7fFwOQp8p2VAi-fcna6YNI4RvhHqHzqjkrOkEY-_rXvOGtC05ReelPBFCqZTtB3RKmeo7QegZet7GMZnsS5xwHPD8G_IYnQ_L7OtlF8NSsDXZeWNxXOa0zNhMDv-MKQXI_0d-WhswmBz2OMUyN_-AmJYwxsnkPd7tkykFJ8g-uo_oZDChwKfjvEC_rq8et7fN_cPN3fbHfWO5EnPTEimEMI4x1qmeOT5Az5QQxAywa4XsbCeN7JVrZc-oskoS6QTr-CBryoBfoG-H3pTjnwXKrEdfLIRgJohL0S2nPeGkq-DlAbQ5lpJh0Cn7sf6tKdGrTb3a1qttLVTFvxx7l90I7hU-6q3A1yNgijVhyGayvrxyouWSybVIHTioFv56yLpYD5MF5zPYWbvo3_7gBcY4nB8</recordid><startdate>20030401</startdate><enddate>20030401</enddate><creator>Zhao, Xiaoqin</creator><creator>Mashikian, John S.</creator><creator>Panzica, Pete</creator><creator>Lerner, Adam</creator><creator>Park, Kyung W.</creator><creator>Comunale, Mark E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030401</creationdate><title>Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period</title><author>Zhao, Xiaoqin ; Mashikian, John S. ; Panzica, Pete ; Lerner, Adam ; Park, Kyung W. ; Comunale, Mark E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - physiology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cardiac output</topic><topic>Cardiac Output - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Transesophageal - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>overestimation</topic><topic>post-cardiopulmonary bypass</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Thermodilution - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ventricular Function - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mashikian, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzica, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyung W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comunale, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Xiaoqin</au><au>Mashikian, John S.</au><au>Panzica, Pete</au><au>Lerner, Adam</au><au>Park, Kyung W.</au><au>Comunale, Mark E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><date>2003-04-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>193-198</pages><issn>1053-0770</issn><eissn>1532-8422</eissn><abstract>Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of measuring cardiac output (CO) in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period by comparing thermodilution with Doppler methods. Design: Prospective and blinded human trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Thirty adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Measurements and Main Results: Thermodilution CO (TCO) was obtained in triplicate. Doppler CO (DCO) in triplicate was obtained at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic valve (AV), and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). CO measurements were made (1) before CPB (baseline), (2) immediately after CPB, (3) 15 minutes after CPB, and (4) 30 minutes after CPB. Before CPB, the DCO at LVOT, RVOT, and AV showed good correlations (r = 0.87, r = 0.88, and r = 0.84, respectively) with TCO. Bias analysis showed no significant difference among TCO and 3 DCOs (p &gt; 0.05 each). Correlation between DCO and TCO decreased but remained significant after CPB (r between 0.57 and 0.85, p &lt; 0.001). The bias among TCO and each of the DCOs at the LVOT, RVOT, and AV increased immediately after CPB (p &lt; 0.01, p &lt; 0.01, and p &lt; 0.05, respectively) and remained significant at 15 minutes and 30 minutes post-CPB except for DCO at the AV. TCO exceeded DCO by 0.44 to 0.72 L/min immediately after CPB. The CO measured by both thermodilution and Doppler methods gradually decreased over time post-CPB. The decrease in CO was significant at 30 minutes post-CPB (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: This study adds further support that DCO is a clinically acceptable method to accurately assess the CO in patients even during periods of uneven regional body temperatures as may occur in the early post-CPB period. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12698401</pmid><doi>10.1053/jcan.2003.46</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-0770
ispartof Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2003-04, Vol.17 (2), p.193-198
issn 1053-0770
1532-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73190308
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Aged
Anesthesia
Anesthesia depending on type of surgery
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve - physiology
Bias
Biological and medical sciences
cardiac output
Cardiac Output - physiology
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Coronary Artery Bypass
Echocardiography, Doppler - statistics & numerical data
Echocardiography, Transesophageal - statistics & numerical data
Female
Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
overestimation
post-cardiopulmonary bypass
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Regression Analysis
Thermodilution - statistics & numerical data
Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass
Time Factors
Ventricular Function - physiology
title Comparison of thermodilution bolus cardiac output and Doppler cardiac output in the early post-cardiopulmonary bypass period
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A39%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20thermodilution%20bolus%20cardiac%20output%20and%20Doppler%20cardiac%20output%20in%20the%20early%20post-cardiopulmonary%20bypass%20period&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiothoracic%20and%20vascular%20anesthesia&rft.au=Zhao,%20Xiaoqin&rft.date=2003-04-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=193-198&rft.issn=1053-0770&rft.eissn=1532-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/jcan.2003.46&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73190308%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-705444ad2228692d3fe926440afeb7458c85a596d759216c6505d4283f57452e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73190308&rft_id=info:pmid/12698401&rfr_iscdi=true