Loading…

[18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with suspected recurrence of breast cancer

To evaluate the role of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in patients presenting with a suspicion of breast cancer relapse after primary treatment. Sixty consecutive female patients with clinical (n=35) or radiological (n=25) suspicion of breast cancer recurrence were e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2003-03, Vol.129 (3), p.147-153
Main Authors: KAMEL, Ehab M, WYSS, Matthias T, FEHR, Mathias K, VON SCHULTHESS, Gustav K, GOERRES, Gerhard W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate the role of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in patients presenting with a suspicion of breast cancer relapse after primary treatment. Sixty consecutive female patients with clinical (n=35) or radiological (n=25) suspicion of breast cancer recurrence were evaluated by FDG-PET. Positive PET findings were further evaluated by histological examination or clinical and radiological follow-up. In 25 patients, the serum tumor marker (CA 15-3) status was compared to the PET results. Disease relapse was proven in 40 patients. Additionally, in three patients a second cancer was diagnosed with (n=1), and without (n=2) concomitant disease relapse. PET missed local recurrence in three patients, and was false positive in another four. In patient-based analysis, the overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 89%, 84%, and 87%, and 100%, 97%, and 98% for locoregional recurrence and distant metastases, respectively. FDG-PET was more sensitive than the serum tumor marker CA 15-3 in detecting relapsed breast cancer. FDG-PET is a valuable tool in the follow-up of patients with breast cancer.
ISSN:0171-5216
1432-1335
DOI:10.1007/s00432-003-0424-z