Loading…

Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study

It is unclear whether reducing the number of cigarettes in smokers not trying to quit increases or decreases the likelihood of future quitting. In a pilot study, smokers not currently interested in quitting (n = 67) were randomized to two groups. Experimental participants received behavioral treatme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nicotine & tobacco research 2003-04, Vol.5 (2), p.155-162
Main Authors: Carpenter, Matthew J., Hughes, John R., Keely, Josue P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-49d4bad9243ccea4a8b217829a9f940cd7bf852bb56c39023d077df8b50f91723
cites
container_end_page 162
container_issue 2
container_start_page 155
container_title Nicotine & tobacco research
container_volume 5
creator Carpenter, Matthew J.
Hughes, John R.
Keely, Josue P.
description It is unclear whether reducing the number of cigarettes in smokers not trying to quit increases or decreases the likelihood of future quitting. In a pilot study, smokers not currently interested in quitting (n = 67) were randomized to two groups. Experimental participants received behavioral treatment and nicotine replacement therapy (choice of gum, patch, or inhaler) to reduce smoking by 50% over 4 weeks, followed by brief advice to quit. Usual-care participants received only brief advice to quit and nicotine replacement if they decided to quit. During the 4-week treatment period, nonabstaining reduction participants decreased from 23 to 14 cigarettes per day (p < .01) and maintained their reduction over the 6-month follow-up period. At the 6-month follow-up, 35% of usual-care and 41% of reduction participants (nonsignificant [ns]) moved forward in their stage of change. Over the 6 months, 34% of usual-care participants had at least one 24-h quit attempt, compared with 25% of reduction participants (ns). A total of 9% of usual-care participants remained quit at 6 months vs. 13% in the reduction group (ns). These preliminary results suggest that adding a reduction option neither increases nor undermines interest in cessation. Higher than expected rates of attempted cessation and quitting in the usual-care group suggest that we recruited smokers whose motivation to quit was above average. Thus, a replication test in a less-motivated group of smokers is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/146222003100007385
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73274214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26759319</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26759319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-49d4bad9243ccea4a8b217829a9f940cd7bf852bb56c39023d077df8b50f91723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtLAzEQx4Motla_gKDk5G01r20Sb6XUFwUvCt6WbB6ydXdTkyzYb29qix4cBmaY-c0w8wfgHKNrjAS6wWxKCEGIYpSNU1EegHEuykJK9nb4k5MiE3QETmJcIUQwFvgYjDDhrGSCj8HTwjmrE_QOxs5_NP07DNYMOjW-h9lblWyA2saotqVbOIPrpvUJ2q-1DU1n-6RaGNNgNqfgyKk22rN9nIDXu8XL_KFYPt8_zmfLQlOCU8GkYbUykjCqtVVMiZpgLohU0kmGtOG1EyWp63KqqUSEGsS5caIukZOYEzoBV7u96-A_BxtT1TVR27ZVvfVDrDjN3xHMMkh2oA4-xmBdtc4Xq7CpMKq2Clb_FcxDl_vtQ91Z8zeylywDFztgFZMPv30y5aWkWNJv2el0qg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73274214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Carpenter, Matthew J. ; Hughes, John R. ; Keely, Josue P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Matthew J. ; Hughes, John R. ; Keely, Josue P.</creatorcontrib><description>It is unclear whether reducing the number of cigarettes in smokers not trying to quit increases or decreases the likelihood of future quitting. In a pilot study, smokers not currently interested in quitting (n = 67) were randomized to two groups. Experimental participants received behavioral treatment and nicotine replacement therapy (choice of gum, patch, or inhaler) to reduce smoking by 50% over 4 weeks, followed by brief advice to quit. Usual-care participants received only brief advice to quit and nicotine replacement if they decided to quit. During the 4-week treatment period, nonabstaining reduction participants decreased from 23 to 14 cigarettes per day (p &lt; .01) and maintained their reduction over the 6-month follow-up period. At the 6-month follow-up, 35% of usual-care and 41% of reduction participants (nonsignificant [ns]) moved forward in their stage of change. Over the 6 months, 34% of usual-care participants had at least one 24-h quit attempt, compared with 25% of reduction participants (ns). A total of 9% of usual-care participants remained quit at 6 months vs. 13% in the reduction group (ns). These preliminary results suggest that adding a reduction option neither increases nor undermines interest in cessation. Higher than expected rates of attempted cessation and quitting in the usual-care group suggest that we recruited smokers whose motivation to quit was above average. Thus, a replication test in a less-motivated group of smokers is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-2203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-994X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/146222003100007385</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12745487</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Administration, Cutaneous ; Adult ; Behavior Therapy - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Motivation ; Nicotine - administration &amp; dosage ; Nicotinic Agonists - administration &amp; dosage ; Pilot Projects ; Smoking - therapy ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Smoking Prevention ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Nicotine &amp; tobacco research, 2003-04, Vol.5 (2), p.155-162</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 Taylor &amp; Francis Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-49d4bad9243ccea4a8b217829a9f940cd7bf852bb56c39023d077df8b50f91723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26759319$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26759319$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12745487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keely, Josue P.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study</title><title>Nicotine &amp; tobacco research</title><addtitle>Nicotine Tob Res</addtitle><description>It is unclear whether reducing the number of cigarettes in smokers not trying to quit increases or decreases the likelihood of future quitting. In a pilot study, smokers not currently interested in quitting (n = 67) were randomized to two groups. Experimental participants received behavioral treatment and nicotine replacement therapy (choice of gum, patch, or inhaler) to reduce smoking by 50% over 4 weeks, followed by brief advice to quit. Usual-care participants received only brief advice to quit and nicotine replacement if they decided to quit. During the 4-week treatment period, nonabstaining reduction participants decreased from 23 to 14 cigarettes per day (p &lt; .01) and maintained their reduction over the 6-month follow-up period. At the 6-month follow-up, 35% of usual-care and 41% of reduction participants (nonsignificant [ns]) moved forward in their stage of change. Over the 6 months, 34% of usual-care participants had at least one 24-h quit attempt, compared with 25% of reduction participants (ns). A total of 9% of usual-care participants remained quit at 6 months vs. 13% in the reduction group (ns). These preliminary results suggest that adding a reduction option neither increases nor undermines interest in cessation. Higher than expected rates of attempted cessation and quitting in the usual-care group suggest that we recruited smokers whose motivation to quit was above average. Thus, a replication test in a less-motivated group of smokers is needed.</description><subject>Administration, Cutaneous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Nicotine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Nicotinic Agonists - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Smoking - therapy</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1462-2203</issn><issn>1469-994X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEtLAzEQx4Motla_gKDk5G01r20Sb6XUFwUvCt6WbB6ydXdTkyzYb29qix4cBmaY-c0w8wfgHKNrjAS6wWxKCEGIYpSNU1EegHEuykJK9nb4k5MiE3QETmJcIUQwFvgYjDDhrGSCj8HTwjmrE_QOxs5_NP07DNYMOjW-h9lblWyA2saotqVbOIPrpvUJ2q-1DU1n-6RaGNNgNqfgyKk22rN9nIDXu8XL_KFYPt8_zmfLQlOCU8GkYbUykjCqtVVMiZpgLohU0kmGtOG1EyWp63KqqUSEGsS5caIukZOYEzoBV7u96-A_BxtT1TVR27ZVvfVDrDjN3xHMMkh2oA4-xmBdtc4Xq7CpMKq2Clb_FcxDl_vtQ91Z8zeylywDFztgFZMPv30y5aWkWNJv2el0qg</recordid><startdate>20030401</startdate><enddate>20030401</enddate><creator>Carpenter, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Hughes, John R.</creator><creator>Keely, Josue P.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030401</creationdate><title>Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study</title><author>Carpenter, Matthew J. ; Hughes, John R. ; Keely, Josue P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-49d4bad9243ccea4a8b217829a9f940cd7bf852bb56c39023d077df8b50f91723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Administration, Cutaneous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Nicotine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Nicotinic Agonists - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Smoking - therapy</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keely, Josue P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nicotine &amp; tobacco research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carpenter, Matthew J.</au><au>Hughes, John R.</au><au>Keely, Josue P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study</atitle><jtitle>Nicotine &amp; tobacco research</jtitle><addtitle>Nicotine Tob Res</addtitle><date>2003-04-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>155-162</pages><issn>1462-2203</issn><eissn>1469-994X</eissn><abstract>It is unclear whether reducing the number of cigarettes in smokers not trying to quit increases or decreases the likelihood of future quitting. In a pilot study, smokers not currently interested in quitting (n = 67) were randomized to two groups. Experimental participants received behavioral treatment and nicotine replacement therapy (choice of gum, patch, or inhaler) to reduce smoking by 50% over 4 weeks, followed by brief advice to quit. Usual-care participants received only brief advice to quit and nicotine replacement if they decided to quit. During the 4-week treatment period, nonabstaining reduction participants decreased from 23 to 14 cigarettes per day (p &lt; .01) and maintained their reduction over the 6-month follow-up period. At the 6-month follow-up, 35% of usual-care and 41% of reduction participants (nonsignificant [ns]) moved forward in their stage of change. Over the 6 months, 34% of usual-care participants had at least one 24-h quit attempt, compared with 25% of reduction participants (ns). A total of 9% of usual-care participants remained quit at 6 months vs. 13% in the reduction group (ns). These preliminary results suggest that adding a reduction option neither increases nor undermines interest in cessation. Higher than expected rates of attempted cessation and quitting in the usual-care group suggest that we recruited smokers whose motivation to quit was above average. Thus, a replication test in a less-motivated group of smokers is needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>12745487</pmid><doi>10.1080/146222003100007385</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-2203
ispartof Nicotine & tobacco research, 2003-04, Vol.5 (2), p.155-162
issn 1462-2203
1469-994X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73274214
source Oxford Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects Administration, Cutaneous
Adult
Behavior Therapy - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Male
Motivation
Nicotine - administration & dosage
Nicotinic Agonists - administration & dosage
Pilot Projects
Smoking - therapy
Smoking Cessation - methods
Smoking Prevention
Time Factors
title Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A36%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20smoking%20reduction%20on%20later%20cessation:%20A%20pilot%20experimental%20study&rft.jtitle=Nicotine%20&%20tobacco%20research&rft.au=Carpenter,%20Matthew%20J.&rft.date=2003-04-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=155-162&rft.issn=1462-2203&rft.eissn=1469-994X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/146222003100007385&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26759319%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-49d4bad9243ccea4a8b217829a9f940cd7bf852bb56c39023d077df8b50f91723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73274214&rft_id=info:pmid/12745487&rft_jstor_id=26759319&rfr_iscdi=true