Loading…
Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study
It is unclear whether reducing the number of cigarettes in smokers not trying to quit increases or decreases the likelihood of future quitting. In a pilot study, smokers not currently interested in quitting (n = 67) were randomized to two groups. Experimental participants received behavioral treatme...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nicotine & tobacco research 2003-04, Vol.5 (2), p.155-162 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-49d4bad9243ccea4a8b217829a9f940cd7bf852bb56c39023d077df8b50f91723 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 162 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 155 |
container_title | Nicotine & tobacco research |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Carpenter, Matthew J. Hughes, John R. Keely, Josue P. |
description | It is unclear whether reducing the number of cigarettes in smokers not trying to quit increases or decreases the likelihood of future quitting. In a pilot study, smokers not currently interested in quitting (n = 67) were randomized to two groups. Experimental participants received behavioral treatment and nicotine replacement therapy (choice of gum, patch, or inhaler) to reduce smoking by 50% over 4 weeks, followed by brief advice to quit. Usual-care participants received only brief advice to quit and nicotine replacement if they decided to quit. During the 4-week treatment period, nonabstaining reduction participants decreased from 23 to 14 cigarettes per day (p < .01) and maintained their reduction over the 6-month follow-up period. At the 6-month follow-up, 35% of usual-care and 41% of reduction participants (nonsignificant [ns]) moved forward in their stage of change. Over the 6 months, 34% of usual-care participants had at least one 24-h quit attempt, compared with 25% of reduction participants (ns). A total of 9% of usual-care participants remained quit at 6 months vs. 13% in the reduction group (ns). These preliminary results suggest that adding a reduction option neither increases nor undermines interest in cessation. Higher than expected rates of attempted cessation and quitting in the usual-care group suggest that we recruited smokers whose motivation to quit was above average. Thus, a replication test in a less-motivated group of smokers is needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/146222003100007385 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73274214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26759319</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26759319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-49d4bad9243ccea4a8b217829a9f940cd7bf852bb56c39023d077df8b50f91723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtLAzEQx4Motla_gKDk5G01r20Sb6XUFwUvCt6WbB6ydXdTkyzYb29qix4cBmaY-c0w8wfgHKNrjAS6wWxKCEGIYpSNU1EegHEuykJK9nb4k5MiE3QETmJcIUQwFvgYjDDhrGSCj8HTwjmrE_QOxs5_NP07DNYMOjW-h9lblWyA2saotqVbOIPrpvUJ2q-1DU1n-6RaGNNgNqfgyKk22rN9nIDXu8XL_KFYPt8_zmfLQlOCU8GkYbUykjCqtVVMiZpgLohU0kmGtOG1EyWp63KqqUSEGsS5caIukZOYEzoBV7u96-A_BxtT1TVR27ZVvfVDrDjN3xHMMkh2oA4-xmBdtc4Xq7CpMKq2Clb_FcxDl_vtQ91Z8zeylywDFztgFZMPv30y5aWkWNJv2el0qg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73274214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Carpenter, Matthew J. ; Hughes, John R. ; Keely, Josue P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Matthew J. ; Hughes, John R. ; Keely, Josue P.</creatorcontrib><description>It is unclear whether reducing the number of cigarettes in smokers not trying to quit increases or decreases the likelihood of future quitting. In a pilot study, smokers not currently interested in quitting (n = 67) were randomized to two groups. Experimental participants received behavioral treatment and nicotine replacement therapy (choice of gum, patch, or inhaler) to reduce smoking by 50% over 4 weeks, followed by brief advice to quit. Usual-care participants received only brief advice to quit and nicotine replacement if they decided to quit. During the 4-week treatment period, nonabstaining reduction participants decreased from 23 to 14 cigarettes per day (p < .01) and maintained their reduction over the 6-month follow-up period. At the 6-month follow-up, 35% of usual-care and 41% of reduction participants (nonsignificant [ns]) moved forward in their stage of change. Over the 6 months, 34% of usual-care participants had at least one 24-h quit attempt, compared with 25% of reduction participants (ns). A total of 9% of usual-care participants remained quit at 6 months vs. 13% in the reduction group (ns). These preliminary results suggest that adding a reduction option neither increases nor undermines interest in cessation. Higher than expected rates of attempted cessation and quitting in the usual-care group suggest that we recruited smokers whose motivation to quit was above average. Thus, a replication test in a less-motivated group of smokers is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-2203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-994X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/146222003100007385</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12745487</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Administration, Cutaneous ; Adult ; Behavior Therapy - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Motivation ; Nicotine - administration & dosage ; Nicotinic Agonists - administration & dosage ; Pilot Projects ; Smoking - therapy ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Smoking Prevention ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Nicotine & tobacco research, 2003-04, Vol.5 (2), p.155-162</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 Taylor & Francis Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-49d4bad9243ccea4a8b217829a9f940cd7bf852bb56c39023d077df8b50f91723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26759319$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26759319$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12745487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keely, Josue P.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study</title><title>Nicotine & tobacco research</title><addtitle>Nicotine Tob Res</addtitle><description>It is unclear whether reducing the number of cigarettes in smokers not trying to quit increases or decreases the likelihood of future quitting. In a pilot study, smokers not currently interested in quitting (n = 67) were randomized to two groups. Experimental participants received behavioral treatment and nicotine replacement therapy (choice of gum, patch, or inhaler) to reduce smoking by 50% over 4 weeks, followed by brief advice to quit. Usual-care participants received only brief advice to quit and nicotine replacement if they decided to quit. During the 4-week treatment period, nonabstaining reduction participants decreased from 23 to 14 cigarettes per day (p < .01) and maintained their reduction over the 6-month follow-up period. At the 6-month follow-up, 35% of usual-care and 41% of reduction participants (nonsignificant [ns]) moved forward in their stage of change. Over the 6 months, 34% of usual-care participants had at least one 24-h quit attempt, compared with 25% of reduction participants (ns). A total of 9% of usual-care participants remained quit at 6 months vs. 13% in the reduction group (ns). These preliminary results suggest that adding a reduction option neither increases nor undermines interest in cessation. Higher than expected rates of attempted cessation and quitting in the usual-care group suggest that we recruited smokers whose motivation to quit was above average. Thus, a replication test in a less-motivated group of smokers is needed.</description><subject>Administration, Cutaneous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Nicotine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Nicotinic Agonists - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Smoking - therapy</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1462-2203</issn><issn>1469-994X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEtLAzEQx4Motla_gKDk5G01r20Sb6XUFwUvCt6WbB6ydXdTkyzYb29qix4cBmaY-c0w8wfgHKNrjAS6wWxKCEGIYpSNU1EegHEuykJK9nb4k5MiE3QETmJcIUQwFvgYjDDhrGSCj8HTwjmrE_QOxs5_NP07DNYMOjW-h9lblWyA2saotqVbOIPrpvUJ2q-1DU1n-6RaGNNgNqfgyKk22rN9nIDXu8XL_KFYPt8_zmfLQlOCU8GkYbUykjCqtVVMiZpgLohU0kmGtOG1EyWp63KqqUSEGsS5caIukZOYEzoBV7u96-A_BxtT1TVR27ZVvfVDrDjN3xHMMkh2oA4-xmBdtc4Xq7CpMKq2Clb_FcxDl_vtQ91Z8zeylywDFztgFZMPv30y5aWkWNJv2el0qg</recordid><startdate>20030401</startdate><enddate>20030401</enddate><creator>Carpenter, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Hughes, John R.</creator><creator>Keely, Josue P.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030401</creationdate><title>Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study</title><author>Carpenter, Matthew J. ; Hughes, John R. ; Keely, Josue P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-49d4bad9243ccea4a8b217829a9f940cd7bf852bb56c39023d077df8b50f91723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Administration, Cutaneous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Nicotine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Nicotinic Agonists - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Smoking - therapy</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keely, Josue P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nicotine & tobacco research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carpenter, Matthew J.</au><au>Hughes, John R.</au><au>Keely, Josue P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study</atitle><jtitle>Nicotine & tobacco research</jtitle><addtitle>Nicotine Tob Res</addtitle><date>2003-04-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>155-162</pages><issn>1462-2203</issn><eissn>1469-994X</eissn><abstract>It is unclear whether reducing the number of cigarettes in smokers not trying to quit increases or decreases the likelihood of future quitting. In a pilot study, smokers not currently interested in quitting (n = 67) were randomized to two groups. Experimental participants received behavioral treatment and nicotine replacement therapy (choice of gum, patch, or inhaler) to reduce smoking by 50% over 4 weeks, followed by brief advice to quit. Usual-care participants received only brief advice to quit and nicotine replacement if they decided to quit. During the 4-week treatment period, nonabstaining reduction participants decreased from 23 to 14 cigarettes per day (p < .01) and maintained their reduction over the 6-month follow-up period. At the 6-month follow-up, 35% of usual-care and 41% of reduction participants (nonsignificant [ns]) moved forward in their stage of change. Over the 6 months, 34% of usual-care participants had at least one 24-h quit attempt, compared with 25% of reduction participants (ns). A total of 9% of usual-care participants remained quit at 6 months vs. 13% in the reduction group (ns). These preliminary results suggest that adding a reduction option neither increases nor undermines interest in cessation. Higher than expected rates of attempted cessation and quitting in the usual-care group suggest that we recruited smokers whose motivation to quit was above average. Thus, a replication test in a less-motivated group of smokers is needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>12745487</pmid><doi>10.1080/146222003100007385</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1462-2203 |
ispartof | Nicotine & tobacco research, 2003-04, Vol.5 (2), p.155-162 |
issn | 1462-2203 1469-994X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73274214 |
source | Oxford Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals |
subjects | Administration, Cutaneous Adult Behavior Therapy - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Incidence Male Motivation Nicotine - administration & dosage Nicotinic Agonists - administration & dosage Pilot Projects Smoking - therapy Smoking Cessation - methods Smoking Prevention Time Factors |
title | Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: A pilot experimental study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A36%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20smoking%20reduction%20on%20later%20cessation:%20A%20pilot%20experimental%20study&rft.jtitle=Nicotine%20&%20tobacco%20research&rft.au=Carpenter,%20Matthew%20J.&rft.date=2003-04-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=155-162&rft.issn=1462-2203&rft.eissn=1469-994X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/146222003100007385&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26759319%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-49d4bad9243ccea4a8b217829a9f940cd7bf852bb56c39023d077df8b50f91723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73274214&rft_id=info:pmid/12745487&rft_jstor_id=26759319&rfr_iscdi=true |