Presumption of death by air medical transport teams

• Published in: Air medical journal 2003-05, Vol.22 (3), p.30-34
• Main Authors: Robinson, Kenneth J., Murphy, Dianne M., Jacobs, Lenworth M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Air Ambulances - standards; Air Ambulances - statistics & numerical data; Classification; Death; Emergency Medical Technicians - standards; Emergency Medical Technicians - statistics & numerical data; Health administration; Health Services Research; Humans; Surveys and Questionnaires; Transportation of Patients; Triage; United States
• ISSN: 1067-991X; 1532-6497
• DOI: 10.1016/S1067-991X(03)70005-4

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate nationwide trends and factors influencing the determination of death practice by rotor-wing air medical transport programs. Methods: A survey was mailed to all Association of Air Medical Service members concerning demographics, crew configuration, team leader, patient population, field death determination protocols, and other possible associated factors. All rotor-wing air medical transport programs that carry out scene transports were included. Results: The most common field presumption criteria were no response to advanced cardiac life support (77%), no signs of life on scene (65%), and asystole in 2 EKG monitor leads (61%). The most frequent reasons cited not to presume a patient dead in the field were political issues (71%) and signs of life on scene (56%). Criteria other than medical condition that were considered in the decision to presume death were ground personnel input (55%) and program policy/medical control (39%). The following factors did not significantly affect the presumption rate: crew configuration, team leader, transport time, billing, and type of medical control. Conclusion: Medical criteria appear to determine presumption of death in the field. Nonmedical factors, such as billing, response, and transport times, do not affect this process.