Loading…

Comparative Evaluation of Five Culture Media with Triplex PCR Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Hence, rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MRSA is a vital constituent of control measures. The present study evaluated five different methods for the identific...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current microbiology 2010-07, Vol.61 (1), p.1-6
Main Authors: Al-Talib, Hassanain, Yean, Chan Yean, Al-khateeb, Alyaa, Singh, Kirnpal-Kaur Banga, Hasan, Habsah, Al-Jashamy, Karim, Ravichandran, Manickam
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-304442ff40acc1e841c2d1388a788ed128397fa8251c226d57cf869d90cd27cd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-304442ff40acc1e841c2d1388a788ed128397fa8251c226d57cf869d90cd27cd3
container_end_page 6
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Current microbiology
container_volume 61
creator Al-Talib, Hassanain
Yean, Chan Yean
Al-khateeb, Alyaa
Singh, Kirnpal-Kaur Banga
Hasan, Habsah
Al-Jashamy, Karim
Ravichandran, Manickam
description The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Hence, rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MRSA is a vital constituent of control measures. The present study evaluated five different methods for the identification of MRSA. A total of 207 S. aureus clinical isolates that consisted of 89 MRSA and 118 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains confirmed by PCR were tested. MRSA strains were evaluated by five different methods: chromogenic MRSA agar (CMRSA), oxacillin resistance screening agar base (ORSAB), mannitol salt oxacillin agar (MSO), mannitol salt cefoxitin agar with two different concentrations of cefoxitin [4 μg/ml (MSC-4) and 6 μg/ml (MSC-6)]. The results of the different methods were compared to mecA PCR as the gold standard. MSC-6 showed only six false-positive MRSA in comparison with PCR. The sensitivities and specificities of MSC-6, MSC-4, MSO-4, ORSAB, and CMRSA were as follows: 98.9/94.9%, 100/83.1%, 89.9/87.3%, 97.8/96.6%, and 95.5/94.9%, respectively. In comparison with PCR, it was found that both MSC-6 and ORSAB were relatively the least expensive screening tests ($0.70 and $1.00, respectively). In conclusion, all methods were comparable, but MSC-6 was the least expensive medium for MRSA screening.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00284-009-9567-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733149452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2051359761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-304442ff40acc1e841c2d1388a788ed128397fa8251c226d57cf869d90cd27cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAYhS0EokPhAdiAxYZV4Pclib2sQi9IrYp6WVvGcTquMnHwpe3seHQ8SgtSF6xs-f_OseUPofcEvhCA9msEoIJXALKSddNW4gVaEc5oBVKSl2gFjLNKNDXZQ29ivAUgVAJ5jfYoAGOkhRX63fnNrINO7s7iwzs95rL1E_YDPtoddXlMOVh8Znun8b1La3wV3DzaB_yju8AHMeotHnzA32yy5il6ZtPaGTeObqoubHQx6Snhy6Tn9Xb0xhuTI9alN8e36NWgx2jfPa776Pro8Ko7qU7Pj793B6eVYZKnigHnnA4DB20MsYITQ3vChNCtELYnVDDZDlrQugxo09etGUQjewmmp63p2T76vPTOwf_KNia1cdHYcdST9TmqtnwIl7ymhfz0jLz1OUzlcYo1NYe6hR1EFsgEH2Owg5qD2-iwVQTUTo5a5KgiR-3kKFEyHx6L88-N7f8mnmwUgC5ALKPpxoZ_N_-v9eMSGrRX-ia4qK4vKRAGRNSEgmR_AHgio6k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>365405702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Evaluation of Five Culture Media with Triplex PCR Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Al-Talib, Hassanain ; Yean, Chan Yean ; Al-khateeb, Alyaa ; Singh, Kirnpal-Kaur Banga ; Hasan, Habsah ; Al-Jashamy, Karim ; Ravichandran, Manickam</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Talib, Hassanain ; Yean, Chan Yean ; Al-khateeb, Alyaa ; Singh, Kirnpal-Kaur Banga ; Hasan, Habsah ; Al-Jashamy, Karim ; Ravichandran, Manickam</creatorcontrib><description>The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Hence, rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MRSA is a vital constituent of control measures. The present study evaluated five different methods for the identification of MRSA. A total of 207 S. aureus clinical isolates that consisted of 89 MRSA and 118 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains confirmed by PCR were tested. MRSA strains were evaluated by five different methods: chromogenic MRSA agar (CMRSA), oxacillin resistance screening agar base (ORSAB), mannitol salt oxacillin agar (MSO), mannitol salt cefoxitin agar with two different concentrations of cefoxitin [4 μg/ml (MSC-4) and 6 μg/ml (MSC-6)]. The results of the different methods were compared to mecA PCR as the gold standard. MSC-6 showed only six false-positive MRSA in comparison with PCR. The sensitivities and specificities of MSC-6, MSC-4, MSO-4, ORSAB, and CMRSA were as follows: 98.9/94.9%, 100/83.1%, 89.9/87.3%, 97.8/96.6%, and 95.5/94.9%, respectively. In comparison with PCR, it was found that both MSC-6 and ORSAB were relatively the least expensive screening tests ($0.70 and $1.00, respectively). In conclusion, all methods were comparable, but MSC-6 was the least expensive medium for MRSA screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0343-8651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00284-009-9567-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20033170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: New York : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agar ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotechnology ; Cefoxitin - pharmacology ; Cell culture ; Comparative studies ; Culture Media ; Drug resistance ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Methicillin - pharmacology ; Methicillin Resistance ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Microbiology ; Nosocomial infection ; Oxacillin - pharmacology ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology ; Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; Staphylococcus aureus - genetics ; Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development ; Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification ; Staphylococcus infections</subject><ispartof>Current microbiology, 2010-07, Vol.61 (1), p.1-6</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-304442ff40acc1e841c2d1388a788ed128397fa8251c226d57cf869d90cd27cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-304442ff40acc1e841c2d1388a788ed128397fa8251c226d57cf869d90cd27cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20033170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Talib, Hassanain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yean, Chan Yean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-khateeb, Alyaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Kirnpal-Kaur Banga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasan, Habsah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Jashamy, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravichandran, Manickam</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Evaluation of Five Culture Media with Triplex PCR Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</title><title>Current microbiology</title><addtitle>Curr Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>Curr Microbiol</addtitle><description>The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Hence, rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MRSA is a vital constituent of control measures. The present study evaluated five different methods for the identification of MRSA. A total of 207 S. aureus clinical isolates that consisted of 89 MRSA and 118 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains confirmed by PCR were tested. MRSA strains were evaluated by five different methods: chromogenic MRSA agar (CMRSA), oxacillin resistance screening agar base (ORSAB), mannitol salt oxacillin agar (MSO), mannitol salt cefoxitin agar with two different concentrations of cefoxitin [4 μg/ml (MSC-4) and 6 μg/ml (MSC-6)]. The results of the different methods were compared to mecA PCR as the gold standard. MSC-6 showed only six false-positive MRSA in comparison with PCR. The sensitivities and specificities of MSC-6, MSC-4, MSO-4, ORSAB, and CMRSA were as follows: 98.9/94.9%, 100/83.1%, 89.9/87.3%, 97.8/96.6%, and 95.5/94.9%, respectively. In comparison with PCR, it was found that both MSC-6 and ORSAB were relatively the least expensive screening tests ($0.70 and $1.00, respectively). In conclusion, all methods were comparable, but MSC-6 was the least expensive medium for MRSA screening.</description><subject>Agar</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cefoxitin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Methicillin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Methicillin Resistance</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Nosocomial infection</subject><subject>Oxacillin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - genetics</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><issn>0343-8651</issn><issn>1432-0991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAYhS0EokPhAdiAxYZV4Pclib2sQi9IrYp6WVvGcTquMnHwpe3seHQ8SgtSF6xs-f_OseUPofcEvhCA9msEoIJXALKSddNW4gVaEc5oBVKSl2gFjLNKNDXZQ29ivAUgVAJ5jfYoAGOkhRX63fnNrINO7s7iwzs95rL1E_YDPtoddXlMOVh8Znun8b1La3wV3DzaB_yju8AHMeotHnzA32yy5il6ZtPaGTeObqoubHQx6Snhy6Tn9Xb0xhuTI9alN8e36NWgx2jfPa776Pro8Ko7qU7Pj793B6eVYZKnigHnnA4DB20MsYITQ3vChNCtELYnVDDZDlrQugxo09etGUQjewmmp63p2T76vPTOwf_KNia1cdHYcdST9TmqtnwIl7ymhfz0jLz1OUzlcYo1NYe6hR1EFsgEH2Owg5qD2-iwVQTUTo5a5KgiR-3kKFEyHx6L88-N7f8mnmwUgC5ALKPpxoZ_N_-v9eMSGrRX-ia4qK4vKRAGRNSEgmR_AHgio6k</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Al-Talib, Hassanain</creator><creator>Yean, Chan Yean</creator><creator>Al-khateeb, Alyaa</creator><creator>Singh, Kirnpal-Kaur Banga</creator><creator>Hasan, Habsah</creator><creator>Al-Jashamy, Karim</creator><creator>Ravichandran, Manickam</creator><general>New York : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Comparative Evaluation of Five Culture Media with Triplex PCR Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</title><author>Al-Talib, Hassanain ; Yean, Chan Yean ; Al-khateeb, Alyaa ; Singh, Kirnpal-Kaur Banga ; Hasan, Habsah ; Al-Jashamy, Karim ; Ravichandran, Manickam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-304442ff40acc1e841c2d1388a788ed128397fa8251c226d57cf869d90cd27cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agar</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cefoxitin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Methicillin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Methicillin Resistance</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Nosocomial infection</topic><topic>Oxacillin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - genetics</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Talib, Hassanain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yean, Chan Yean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-khateeb, Alyaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Kirnpal-Kaur Banga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasan, Habsah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Jashamy, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravichandran, Manickam</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Talib, Hassanain</au><au>Yean, Chan Yean</au><au>Al-khateeb, Alyaa</au><au>Singh, Kirnpal-Kaur Banga</au><au>Hasan, Habsah</au><au>Al-Jashamy, Karim</au><au>Ravichandran, Manickam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Evaluation of Five Culture Media with Triplex PCR Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</atitle><jtitle>Current microbiology</jtitle><stitle>Curr Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>Curr Microbiol</addtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>0343-8651</issn><eissn>1432-0991</eissn><abstract>The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Hence, rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MRSA is a vital constituent of control measures. The present study evaluated five different methods for the identification of MRSA. A total of 207 S. aureus clinical isolates that consisted of 89 MRSA and 118 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains confirmed by PCR were tested. MRSA strains were evaluated by five different methods: chromogenic MRSA agar (CMRSA), oxacillin resistance screening agar base (ORSAB), mannitol salt oxacillin agar (MSO), mannitol salt cefoxitin agar with two different concentrations of cefoxitin [4 μg/ml (MSC-4) and 6 μg/ml (MSC-6)]. The results of the different methods were compared to mecA PCR as the gold standard. MSC-6 showed only six false-positive MRSA in comparison with PCR. The sensitivities and specificities of MSC-6, MSC-4, MSO-4, ORSAB, and CMRSA were as follows: 98.9/94.9%, 100/83.1%, 89.9/87.3%, 97.8/96.6%, and 95.5/94.9%, respectively. In comparison with PCR, it was found that both MSC-6 and ORSAB were relatively the least expensive screening tests ($0.70 and $1.00, respectively). In conclusion, all methods were comparable, but MSC-6 was the least expensive medium for MRSA screening.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>New York : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20033170</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00284-009-9567-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0343-8651
ispartof Current microbiology, 2010-07, Vol.61 (1), p.1-6
issn 0343-8651
1432-0991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733149452
source Springer Nature
subjects Agar
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biotechnology
Cefoxitin - pharmacology
Cell culture
Comparative studies
Culture Media
Drug resistance
Humans
Life Sciences
Methicillin - pharmacology
Methicillin Resistance
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Microbiology
Nosocomial infection
Oxacillin - pharmacology
Polymerase chain reaction
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Sensitivity and Specificity
Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology
Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects
Staphylococcus aureus - genetics
Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development
Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification
Staphylococcus infections
title Comparative Evaluation of Five Culture Media with Triplex PCR Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A58%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20Five%20Culture%20Media%20with%20Triplex%20PCR%20Assay%20for%20Detection%20of%20Methicillin-Resistant%20Staphylococcus%20aureus&rft.jtitle=Current%20microbiology&rft.au=Al-Talib,%20Hassanain&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=0343-8651&rft.eissn=1432-0991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00284-009-9567-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2051359761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-304442ff40acc1e841c2d1388a788ed128397fa8251c226d57cf869d90cd27cd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=365405702&rft_id=info:pmid/20033170&rfr_iscdi=true