Loading…
Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience
1. Evaluation of frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications. 2. Analysis of ophthalmological disorders as indications for cesarean section. 4895 cesarean sections were performed (100 due to ocular indications) in the Department of Obstetrics, Female Pathology and Oncological Gynecology be...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ginekologia polska 2010-03, Vol.81 (3), p.188-191 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | Polish |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 191 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 188 |
container_title | Ginekologia polska |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Socha, Maciej W Piotrowiak, Ilona Jagielska, Iwona Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita Szymański, Marek Duczmal, Michal Zalewska, Marta Szymański, Wiesław |
description | 1. Evaluation of frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications. 2. Analysis of ophthalmological disorders as indications for cesarean section.
4895 cesarean sections were performed (100 due to ocular indications) in the Department of Obstetrics, Female Pathology and Oncological Gynecology between 2000 and 2008. Medical documentation was analyzed.
Among 4895 patients undergoing cesarean sections, 100 (2.04%) presented a written certification from an ophthalmologist suggesting this way of delivery. The frequency of c-sections due to ocular indications continued to increase between 2000-2005 and has been in decline since 2006. The most common ophthalmological disorders included myopia (57%), retinopathy (20%), glaucoma (5%), imminent retinal detachment (4%) and past retinal detachment (3%). In 45% of patients an eye pathology was the only reason for a cesarean section.
1. The frequency of cesarean sections due to ocular reasons in our material was 0.7%- 3.44%, average 2.04%. 2. Since 2006 the number of ocular indications for cesarean section has been decreasing. Nevertheless, it remains to be twice as high as in 2000. 3. The most common eye disorders leading to cesarean section were myopia and retinopathy 4. In almost half of the patients the decision to conduct a cesarean section was based solely on ophthalmological indications. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733160154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733160154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p168t-cf6326af2491a5521a2be49699e4de05f8a1729e3b01108c892f5a14f9caa6723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkN1KAzEQhYMottS-ggS88Cqw-dns5lKKf1AQRK-XaXYCKdvNmuyqfQDf20jbG3Mxgck3Z3LOGZmLUkmmK12dk3lR8IrlwmdkmdK2yEeLShhzSWaiULUupZmTn1ccY0gD2tF_IoUeun3yiQZHg506iLT1KcQWY8qPLXURPybs7f6PsJggIvQ0_Y2HPlEX4mnO9623cGj7noq8n-VSMxamDH31FL8HjD6L4RW5cNAlXB7vBXl_uH9bPbH1y-Pz6m7NBq7rkVmnpdDghDIcylJwEBtURhuDqsWidDXw7BDlJtsualsb4UrgyhkLoCshF-T2oDvEkG2ksdn5ZLHroMcwpaaSkuuC5xQX5OYfuc3fzumkRiitBOeyqjN1faSmzQ7bZoh-B3HfnPKVv5N4eFE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464211378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Socha, Maciej W ; Piotrowiak, Ilona ; Jagielska, Iwona ; Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita ; Szymański, Marek ; Duczmal, Michal ; Zalewska, Marta ; Szymański, Wiesław</creator><creatorcontrib>Socha, Maciej W ; Piotrowiak, Ilona ; Jagielska, Iwona ; Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita ; Szymański, Marek ; Duczmal, Michal ; Zalewska, Marta ; Szymański, Wiesław</creatorcontrib><description>1. Evaluation of frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications. 2. Analysis of ophthalmological disorders as indications for cesarean section.
4895 cesarean sections were performed (100 due to ocular indications) in the Department of Obstetrics, Female Pathology and Oncological Gynecology between 2000 and 2008. Medical documentation was analyzed.
Among 4895 patients undergoing cesarean sections, 100 (2.04%) presented a written certification from an ophthalmologist suggesting this way of delivery. The frequency of c-sections due to ocular indications continued to increase between 2000-2005 and has been in decline since 2006. The most common ophthalmological disorders included myopia (57%), retinopathy (20%), glaucoma (5%), imminent retinal detachment (4%) and past retinal detachment (3%). In 45% of patients an eye pathology was the only reason for a cesarean section.
1. The frequency of cesarean sections due to ocular reasons in our material was 0.7%- 3.44%, average 2.04%. 2. Since 2006 the number of ocular indications for cesarean section has been decreasing. Nevertheless, it remains to be twice as high as in 2000. 3. The most common eye disorders leading to cesarean section were myopia and retinopathy 4. In almost half of the patients the decision to conduct a cesarean section was based solely on ophthalmological indications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-0011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2543-6767</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20486539</identifier><language>pol</language><publisher>Poland: Wydawnictwo Via Medica</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers ; Cesarean section ; Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data ; Eye Diseases - epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Maternal Welfare ; Poland ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data ; Retinal detachment ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Ginekologia polska, 2010-03, Vol.81 (3), p.188-191</ispartof><rights>2010. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2464211378?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,37012,37013,44590</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20486539$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Socha, Maciej W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piotrowiak, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagielska, Iwona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymański, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duczmal, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalewska, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymański, Wiesław</creatorcontrib><title>Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience</title><title>Ginekologia polska</title><addtitle>Ginekol Pol</addtitle><description>1. Evaluation of frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications. 2. Analysis of ophthalmological disorders as indications for cesarean section.
4895 cesarean sections were performed (100 due to ocular indications) in the Department of Obstetrics, Female Pathology and Oncological Gynecology between 2000 and 2008. Medical documentation was analyzed.
Among 4895 patients undergoing cesarean sections, 100 (2.04%) presented a written certification from an ophthalmologist suggesting this way of delivery. The frequency of c-sections due to ocular indications continued to increase between 2000-2005 and has been in decline since 2006. The most common ophthalmological disorders included myopia (57%), retinopathy (20%), glaucoma (5%), imminent retinal detachment (4%) and past retinal detachment (3%). In 45% of patients an eye pathology was the only reason for a cesarean section.
1. The frequency of cesarean sections due to ocular reasons in our material was 0.7%- 3.44%, average 2.04%. 2. Since 2006 the number of ocular indications for cesarean section has been decreasing. Nevertheless, it remains to be twice as high as in 2000. 3. The most common eye disorders leading to cesarean section were myopia and retinopathy 4. In almost half of the patients the decision to conduct a cesarean section was based solely on ophthalmological indications.</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Eye Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Welfare</subject><subject>Poland</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Retinal detachment</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0017-0011</issn><issn>2543-6767</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkN1KAzEQhYMottS-ggS88Cqw-dns5lKKf1AQRK-XaXYCKdvNmuyqfQDf20jbG3Mxgck3Z3LOGZmLUkmmK12dk3lR8IrlwmdkmdK2yEeLShhzSWaiULUupZmTn1ccY0gD2tF_IoUeun3yiQZHg506iLT1KcQWY8qPLXURPybs7f6PsJggIvQ0_Y2HPlEX4mnO9623cGj7noq8n-VSMxamDH31FL8HjD6L4RW5cNAlXB7vBXl_uH9bPbH1y-Pz6m7NBq7rkVmnpdDghDIcylJwEBtURhuDqsWidDXw7BDlJtsualsb4UrgyhkLoCshF-T2oDvEkG2ksdn5ZLHroMcwpaaSkuuC5xQX5OYfuc3fzumkRiitBOeyqjN1faSmzQ7bZoh-B3HfnPKVv5N4eFE</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Socha, Maciej W</creator><creator>Piotrowiak, Ilona</creator><creator>Jagielska, Iwona</creator><creator>Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita</creator><creator>Szymański, Marek</creator><creator>Duczmal, Michal</creator><creator>Zalewska, Marta</creator><creator>Szymański, Wiesław</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience</title><author>Socha, Maciej W ; Piotrowiak, Ilona ; Jagielska, Iwona ; Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita ; Szymański, Marek ; Duczmal, Michal ; Zalewska, Marta ; Szymański, Wiesław</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p168t-cf6326af2491a5521a2be49699e4de05f8a1729e3b01108c892f5a14f9caa6723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>pol</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Eye Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Welfare</topic><topic>Poland</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Retinal detachment</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Socha, Maciej W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piotrowiak, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagielska, Iwona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymański, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duczmal, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalewska, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymański, Wiesław</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ginekologia polska</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Socha, Maciej W</au><au>Piotrowiak, Ilona</au><au>Jagielska, Iwona</au><au>Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita</au><au>Szymański, Marek</au><au>Duczmal, Michal</au><au>Zalewska, Marta</au><au>Szymański, Wiesław</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience</atitle><jtitle>Ginekologia polska</jtitle><addtitle>Ginekol Pol</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>188-191</pages><issn>0017-0011</issn><eissn>2543-6767</eissn><abstract>1. Evaluation of frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications. 2. Analysis of ophthalmological disorders as indications for cesarean section.
4895 cesarean sections were performed (100 due to ocular indications) in the Department of Obstetrics, Female Pathology and Oncological Gynecology between 2000 and 2008. Medical documentation was analyzed.
Among 4895 patients undergoing cesarean sections, 100 (2.04%) presented a written certification from an ophthalmologist suggesting this way of delivery. The frequency of c-sections due to ocular indications continued to increase between 2000-2005 and has been in decline since 2006. The most common ophthalmological disorders included myopia (57%), retinopathy (20%), glaucoma (5%), imminent retinal detachment (4%) and past retinal detachment (3%). In 45% of patients an eye pathology was the only reason for a cesarean section.
1. The frequency of cesarean sections due to ocular reasons in our material was 0.7%- 3.44%, average 2.04%. 2. Since 2006 the number of ocular indications for cesarean section has been decreasing. Nevertheless, it remains to be twice as high as in 2000. 3. The most common eye disorders leading to cesarean section were myopia and retinopathy 4. In almost half of the patients the decision to conduct a cesarean section was based solely on ophthalmological indications.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</pub><pmid>20486539</pmid><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-0011 |
ispartof | Ginekologia polska, 2010-03, Vol.81 (3), p.188-191 |
issn | 0017-0011 2543-6767 |
language | pol |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733160154 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Academic Medical Centers Cesarean section Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data Eye Diseases - epidemiology Female Humans Maternal Welfare Poland Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data Retinal detachment Retrospective Studies Risk Factors |
title | Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A26%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrospective%20analysis%20of%20ocular%20disorders%20and%20frequency%20of%20cesarean%20sections%20for%20ocular%20indications%20in%202000-2008--our%20own%20experience&rft.jtitle=Ginekologia%20polska&rft.au=Socha,%20Maciej%20W&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=188-191&rft.issn=0017-0011&rft.eissn=2543-6767&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733160154%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p168t-cf6326af2491a5521a2be49699e4de05f8a1729e3b01108c892f5a14f9caa6723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464211378&rft_id=info:pmid/20486539&rfr_iscdi=true |