Loading…

Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience

1. Evaluation of frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications. 2. Analysis of ophthalmological disorders as indications for cesarean section. 4895 cesarean sections were performed (100 due to ocular indications) in the Department of Obstetrics, Female Pathology and Oncological Gynecology be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ginekologia polska 2010-03, Vol.81 (3), p.188-191
Main Authors: Socha, Maciej W, Piotrowiak, Ilona, Jagielska, Iwona, Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita, Szymański, Marek, Duczmal, Michal, Zalewska, Marta, Szymański, Wiesław
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 191
container_issue 3
container_start_page 188
container_title Ginekologia polska
container_volume 81
creator Socha, Maciej W
Piotrowiak, Ilona
Jagielska, Iwona
Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita
Szymański, Marek
Duczmal, Michal
Zalewska, Marta
Szymański, Wiesław
description 1. Evaluation of frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications. 2. Analysis of ophthalmological disorders as indications for cesarean section. 4895 cesarean sections were performed (100 due to ocular indications) in the Department of Obstetrics, Female Pathology and Oncological Gynecology between 2000 and 2008. Medical documentation was analyzed. Among 4895 patients undergoing cesarean sections, 100 (2.04%) presented a written certification from an ophthalmologist suggesting this way of delivery. The frequency of c-sections due to ocular indications continued to increase between 2000-2005 and has been in decline since 2006. The most common ophthalmological disorders included myopia (57%), retinopathy (20%), glaucoma (5%), imminent retinal detachment (4%) and past retinal detachment (3%). In 45% of patients an eye pathology was the only reason for a cesarean section. 1. The frequency of cesarean sections due to ocular reasons in our material was 0.7%- 3.44%, average 2.04%. 2. Since 2006 the number of ocular indications for cesarean section has been decreasing. Nevertheless, it remains to be twice as high as in 2000. 3. The most common eye disorders leading to cesarean section were myopia and retinopathy 4. In almost half of the patients the decision to conduct a cesarean section was based solely on ophthalmological indications.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733160154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733160154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p168t-cf6326af2491a5521a2be49699e4de05f8a1729e3b01108c892f5a14f9caa6723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkN1KAzEQhYMottS-ggS88Cqw-dns5lKKf1AQRK-XaXYCKdvNmuyqfQDf20jbG3Mxgck3Z3LOGZmLUkmmK12dk3lR8IrlwmdkmdK2yEeLShhzSWaiULUupZmTn1ccY0gD2tF_IoUeun3yiQZHg506iLT1KcQWY8qPLXURPybs7f6PsJggIvQ0_Y2HPlEX4mnO9623cGj7noq8n-VSMxamDH31FL8HjD6L4RW5cNAlXB7vBXl_uH9bPbH1y-Pz6m7NBq7rkVmnpdDghDIcylJwEBtURhuDqsWidDXw7BDlJtsualsb4UrgyhkLoCshF-T2oDvEkG2ksdn5ZLHroMcwpaaSkuuC5xQX5OYfuc3fzumkRiitBOeyqjN1faSmzQ7bZoh-B3HfnPKVv5N4eFE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464211378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Socha, Maciej W ; Piotrowiak, Ilona ; Jagielska, Iwona ; Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita ; Szymański, Marek ; Duczmal, Michal ; Zalewska, Marta ; Szymański, Wiesław</creator><creatorcontrib>Socha, Maciej W ; Piotrowiak, Ilona ; Jagielska, Iwona ; Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita ; Szymański, Marek ; Duczmal, Michal ; Zalewska, Marta ; Szymański, Wiesław</creatorcontrib><description>1. Evaluation of frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications. 2. Analysis of ophthalmological disorders as indications for cesarean section. 4895 cesarean sections were performed (100 due to ocular indications) in the Department of Obstetrics, Female Pathology and Oncological Gynecology between 2000 and 2008. Medical documentation was analyzed. Among 4895 patients undergoing cesarean sections, 100 (2.04%) presented a written certification from an ophthalmologist suggesting this way of delivery. The frequency of c-sections due to ocular indications continued to increase between 2000-2005 and has been in decline since 2006. The most common ophthalmological disorders included myopia (57%), retinopathy (20%), glaucoma (5%), imminent retinal detachment (4%) and past retinal detachment (3%). In 45% of patients an eye pathology was the only reason for a cesarean section. 1. The frequency of cesarean sections due to ocular reasons in our material was 0.7%- 3.44%, average 2.04%. 2. Since 2006 the number of ocular indications for cesarean section has been decreasing. Nevertheless, it remains to be twice as high as in 2000. 3. The most common eye disorders leading to cesarean section were myopia and retinopathy 4. In almost half of the patients the decision to conduct a cesarean section was based solely on ophthalmological indications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-0011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2543-6767</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20486539</identifier><language>pol</language><publisher>Poland: Wydawnictwo Via Medica</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers ; Cesarean section ; Cesarean Section - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Eye Diseases - epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Maternal Welfare ; Poland ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retinal detachment ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Ginekologia polska, 2010-03, Vol.81 (3), p.188-191</ispartof><rights>2010. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2464211378?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,37012,37013,44590</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20486539$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Socha, Maciej W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piotrowiak, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagielska, Iwona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymański, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duczmal, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalewska, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymański, Wiesław</creatorcontrib><title>Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience</title><title>Ginekologia polska</title><addtitle>Ginekol Pol</addtitle><description>1. Evaluation of frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications. 2. Analysis of ophthalmological disorders as indications for cesarean section. 4895 cesarean sections were performed (100 due to ocular indications) in the Department of Obstetrics, Female Pathology and Oncological Gynecology between 2000 and 2008. Medical documentation was analyzed. Among 4895 patients undergoing cesarean sections, 100 (2.04%) presented a written certification from an ophthalmologist suggesting this way of delivery. The frequency of c-sections due to ocular indications continued to increase between 2000-2005 and has been in decline since 2006. The most common ophthalmological disorders included myopia (57%), retinopathy (20%), glaucoma (5%), imminent retinal detachment (4%) and past retinal detachment (3%). In 45% of patients an eye pathology was the only reason for a cesarean section. 1. The frequency of cesarean sections due to ocular reasons in our material was 0.7%- 3.44%, average 2.04%. 2. Since 2006 the number of ocular indications for cesarean section has been decreasing. Nevertheless, it remains to be twice as high as in 2000. 3. The most common eye disorders leading to cesarean section were myopia and retinopathy 4. In almost half of the patients the decision to conduct a cesarean section was based solely on ophthalmological indications.</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Eye Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Welfare</subject><subject>Poland</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retinal detachment</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0017-0011</issn><issn>2543-6767</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkN1KAzEQhYMottS-ggS88Cqw-dns5lKKf1AQRK-XaXYCKdvNmuyqfQDf20jbG3Mxgck3Z3LOGZmLUkmmK12dk3lR8IrlwmdkmdK2yEeLShhzSWaiULUupZmTn1ccY0gD2tF_IoUeun3yiQZHg506iLT1KcQWY8qPLXURPybs7f6PsJggIvQ0_Y2HPlEX4mnO9623cGj7noq8n-VSMxamDH31FL8HjD6L4RW5cNAlXB7vBXl_uH9bPbH1y-Pz6m7NBq7rkVmnpdDghDIcylJwEBtURhuDqsWidDXw7BDlJtsualsb4UrgyhkLoCshF-T2oDvEkG2ksdn5ZLHroMcwpaaSkuuC5xQX5OYfuc3fzumkRiitBOeyqjN1faSmzQ7bZoh-B3HfnPKVv5N4eFE</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Socha, Maciej W</creator><creator>Piotrowiak, Ilona</creator><creator>Jagielska, Iwona</creator><creator>Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita</creator><creator>Szymański, Marek</creator><creator>Duczmal, Michal</creator><creator>Zalewska, Marta</creator><creator>Szymański, Wiesław</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience</title><author>Socha, Maciej W ; Piotrowiak, Ilona ; Jagielska, Iwona ; Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita ; Szymański, Marek ; Duczmal, Michal ; Zalewska, Marta ; Szymański, Wiesław</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p168t-cf6326af2491a5521a2be49699e4de05f8a1729e3b01108c892f5a14f9caa6723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>pol</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Eye Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Welfare</topic><topic>Poland</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retinal detachment</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Socha, Maciej W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piotrowiak, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagielska, Iwona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymański, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duczmal, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalewska, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szymański, Wiesław</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ginekologia polska</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Socha, Maciej W</au><au>Piotrowiak, Ilona</au><au>Jagielska, Iwona</au><au>Kazdepka-Ziemińska, Anita</au><au>Szymański, Marek</au><au>Duczmal, Michal</au><au>Zalewska, Marta</au><au>Szymański, Wiesław</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience</atitle><jtitle>Ginekologia polska</jtitle><addtitle>Ginekol Pol</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>188-191</pages><issn>0017-0011</issn><eissn>2543-6767</eissn><abstract>1. Evaluation of frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications. 2. Analysis of ophthalmological disorders as indications for cesarean section. 4895 cesarean sections were performed (100 due to ocular indications) in the Department of Obstetrics, Female Pathology and Oncological Gynecology between 2000 and 2008. Medical documentation was analyzed. Among 4895 patients undergoing cesarean sections, 100 (2.04%) presented a written certification from an ophthalmologist suggesting this way of delivery. The frequency of c-sections due to ocular indications continued to increase between 2000-2005 and has been in decline since 2006. The most common ophthalmological disorders included myopia (57%), retinopathy (20%), glaucoma (5%), imminent retinal detachment (4%) and past retinal detachment (3%). In 45% of patients an eye pathology was the only reason for a cesarean section. 1. The frequency of cesarean sections due to ocular reasons in our material was 0.7%- 3.44%, average 2.04%. 2. Since 2006 the number of ocular indications for cesarean section has been decreasing. Nevertheless, it remains to be twice as high as in 2000. 3. The most common eye disorders leading to cesarean section were myopia and retinopathy 4. In almost half of the patients the decision to conduct a cesarean section was based solely on ophthalmological indications.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</pub><pmid>20486539</pmid><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-0011
ispartof Ginekologia polska, 2010-03, Vol.81 (3), p.188-191
issn 0017-0011
2543-6767
language pol
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733160154
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Academic Medical Centers
Cesarean section
Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data
Eye Diseases - epidemiology
Female
Humans
Maternal Welfare
Poland
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology
Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data
Retinal detachment
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
title Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008--our own experience
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A26%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrospective%20analysis%20of%20ocular%20disorders%20and%20frequency%20of%20cesarean%20sections%20for%20ocular%20indications%20in%202000-2008--our%20own%20experience&rft.jtitle=Ginekologia%20polska&rft.au=Socha,%20Maciej%20W&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=188-191&rft.issn=0017-0011&rft.eissn=2543-6767&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733160154%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p168t-cf6326af2491a5521a2be49699e4de05f8a1729e3b01108c892f5a14f9caa6723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464211378&rft_id=info:pmid/20486539&rfr_iscdi=true