When the blind lead the blind: In the pit of peer review

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Equine veterinary journal 2010-05, Vol.42 (4), p.283-283
Main Author: ROSSDALE, P. D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Double-Blind Method
Peer Review, Research - ethics
Peer Review, Research - methods
Periodicals as Topic - ethics
Periodicals as Topic - standards
Prejudice
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-11a7b302b468f3acbf7c8a04834524bc9bf15220dec92e81fb9fb49efffb7c1b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-11a7b302b468f3acbf7c8a04834524bc9bf15220dec92e81fb9fb49efffb7c1b3
container_end_page 283
container_issue 4
container_start_page 283
container_title Equine veterinary journal
container_volume 42
creator ROSSDALE, P. D.
description
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00125.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733165727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733165727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-11a7b302b468f3acbf7c8a04834524bc9bf15220dec92e81fb9fb49efffb7c1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFtPwkAQhTdGI4j-BdM3n4p77RbjiyGAKF4SLzxuuu1sKBZau0Xg37u1iK_Oy5zdOWcm-RDyCO4SV5fzLsWc-ozhwCn3izGhors5QO394BC1nRQ-CThvoRNr5xgzRjk9Ri2KBRWYkzYKpzNYetUMPJ2ly8TLIEr-nlfeuBkWaeXlxisASq-ErxTWp-jIRJmFs13voLfh4LV_60-eRuP-zcSPORbuOomkZphqHoSGRbE2Mg4jzEPGBeU67mlDBKU4gbhHISRG94zmPTDGaBkTzTrootlblPnnCmylFqmNIcuiJeQrqyRjJBCSSucMG2dc5taWYFRRpouo3CqCVY1NzVVNR9V0VI1N_WBTGxc93x1Z6QUk--AvJ2e4bgzrNIPtvxerwfudEy7uN_HUVrDZx6PyQwWSSaGmjyPFhuHzw4sk6p59A4v4iDI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733165727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When the blind lead the blind: In the pit of peer review</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>ROSSDALE, P. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>ROSSDALE, P. D.</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0425-1644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-3306</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00125.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20525041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Double-Blind Method ; Peer Review, Research - ethics ; Peer Review, Research - methods ; Periodicals as Topic - ethics ; Periodicals as Topic - standards ; Prejudice</subject><ispartof>Equine veterinary journal, 2010-05, Vol.42 (4), p.283-283</ispartof><rights>2010 EVJ Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-11a7b302b468f3acbf7c8a04834524bc9bf15220dec92e81fb9fb49efffb7c1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-11a7b302b468f3acbf7c8a04834524bc9bf15220dec92e81fb9fb49efffb7c1b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20525041$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROSSDALE, P. D.</creatorcontrib><title>When the blind lead the blind: In the pit of peer review</title><title>Equine veterinary journal</title><addtitle>Equine Vet J</addtitle><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Peer Review, Research - ethics</subject><subject>Peer Review, Research - methods</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - ethics</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><issn>0425-1644</issn><issn>2042-3306</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkFtPwkAQhTdGI4j-BdM3n4p77RbjiyGAKF4SLzxuuu1sKBZau0Xg37u1iK_Oy5zdOWcm-RDyCO4SV5fzLsWc-ozhwCn3izGhors5QO394BC1nRQ-CThvoRNr5xgzRjk9Ri2KBRWYkzYKpzNYetUMPJ2ly8TLIEr-nlfeuBkWaeXlxisASq-ErxTWp-jIRJmFs13voLfh4LV_60-eRuP-zcSPORbuOomkZphqHoSGRbE2Mg4jzEPGBeU67mlDBKU4gbhHISRG94zmPTDGaBkTzTrootlblPnnCmylFqmNIcuiJeQrqyRjJBCSSucMG2dc5taWYFRRpouo3CqCVY1NzVVNR9V0VI1N_WBTGxc93x1Z6QUk--AvJ2e4bgzrNIPtvxerwfudEy7uN_HUVrDZx6PyQwWSSaGmjyPFhuHzw4sk6p59A4v4iDI</recordid><startdate>201005</startdate><enddate>201005</enddate><creator>ROSSDALE, P. D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201005</creationdate><title>When the blind lead the blind: In the pit of peer review</title><author>ROSSDALE, P. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-11a7b302b468f3acbf7c8a04834524bc9bf15220dec92e81fb9fb49efffb7c1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Peer Review, Research - ethics</topic><topic>Peer Review, Research - methods</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - ethics</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROSSDALE, P. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Equine veterinary journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROSSDALE, P. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When the blind lead the blind: In the pit of peer review</atitle><jtitle>Equine veterinary journal</jtitle><addtitle>Equine Vet J</addtitle><date>2010-05</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>283-283</pages><issn>0425-1644</issn><eissn>2042-3306</eissn><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20525041</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00125.x</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0425-1644
ispartof Equine veterinary journal, 2010-05, Vol.42 (4), p.283-283
issn 0425-1644
2042-3306
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733165727
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Double-Blind Method
Peer Review, Research - ethics
Peer Review, Research - methods
Periodicals as Topic - ethics
Periodicals as Topic - standards
Prejudice
title When the blind lead the blind: In the pit of peer review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A05%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20the%20blind%20lead%20the%20blind:%20In%20the%20pit%20of%20peer%20review&rft.jtitle=Equine%20veterinary%20journal&rft.au=ROSSDALE,%20P.%20D.&rft.date=2010-05&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=283-283&rft.issn=0425-1644&rft.eissn=2042-3306&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00125.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733165727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-11a7b302b468f3acbf7c8a04834524bc9bf15220dec92e81fb9fb49efffb7c1b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733165727&rft_id=info:pmid/20525041&rfr_iscdi=true