Loading…

Impact of cost sharing on prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries

Incentive-based prescription drug cost sharing can encourage seniors to use generic medications. Little information exists about prescription drug cost sharing and generic use in employer-sponsored plans after the implementation of Medicare Part D. To compare prescription drug cost sharing across pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research in social and administrative pharmacy 2010-06, Vol.6 (2), p.100-109
Main Authors: Goedken, Amber M., Urmie, Julie M., Farris, Karen B., Doucette, William R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-7a58c2f377dc8b15ba0f3a242f8a16499205fb0bac2211eb2c750f654e8912bb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-7a58c2f377dc8b15ba0f3a242f8a16499205fb0bac2211eb2c750f654e8912bb3
container_end_page 109
container_issue 2
container_start_page 100
container_title Research in social and administrative pharmacy
container_volume 6
creator Goedken, Amber M.
Urmie, Julie M.
Farris, Karen B.
Doucette, William R.
description Incentive-based prescription drug cost sharing can encourage seniors to use generic medications. Little information exists about prescription drug cost sharing and generic use in employer-sponsored plans after the implementation of Medicare Part D. To compare prescription drug cost sharing across prescription insurance type for Medicare beneficiaries after Medicare Part D, to assess the impact of that cost sharing on the number of medications used, and to examine how generic utilization rates differ before and after Medicare Part D and across the type of insurance. This longitudinal study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older used Web-based surveys administered in 2005 and 2007 by Harris Interactive ® to collect information on prescription drug coverage and medication use. Co-payment plans were categorized as low, medium, or high co-payment plans. Multiple regression was used to assess the impact of co-payment rank on the number of prescription drugs. t-Tests and analysis of variance were used to compare generic use over time and between coverage types. One thousand two hundred twenty and 1024 respondents completed the baseline and follow-up surveys, respectively. Among 3-tier co-payment plans, brand drug co-payments were higher for Part D plans ($26 for preferred brand and $55 for nonpreferred brand) than employer-based plans ($20 for preferred brand and $39 for nonpreferred brand). Co-payment was not a significant predictor for the number of prescription drugs. Generic use was lowest among beneficiaries in employer plans both before and after Part D. In 2007, generic use among beneficiaries with Part D was not significantly different from the generic use for beneficiaries with no drug coverage. Medicare beneficiaries in Part D had higher cost sharing amounts than those with employer coverage, but higher cost sharing was not significantly linked to lower prescription use. Generic use for Part D beneficiaries was higher than that for beneficiaries with employer coverage but the same as that for beneficiaries without drug coverage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.03.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733185139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1551741110000380</els_id><sourcerecordid>733185139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-7a58c2f377dc8b15ba0f3a242f8a16499205fb0bac2211eb2c750f654e8912bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PxCAQhonR6PrxEzTcPLUyULbtyRjjx8Y1XvRMgA7KZvshtCb778Xs6tUTA3neGeYh5BxYDgzmV6s86uFDhzbnLL0xkTMm9sgMalFkFUi2n2opISsLgCNyHOMqASWD4pAccSYBgNUz8rRoB21H2jtq-zjSmFr67p32HR0CRhv8MPp0acL0HukUsaFmQ5-x8VYHpAY7dN76FMJ4Sg6cXkc8250n5O3-7vX2MVu-PCxub5aZFfNizEotK8udKMvGVgak0cwJzQvuKg3zoq7T75xhRlvOAdBwW0rm5rLAqgZujDghl9u-Q-g_J4yjan20uF7rDvspqlIIqCSIOpFyS9rQxxjQqSH4VoeNAqZ-NKqV2mlUPxoVEypZSrmL3YTJtNj8pX69JeB6C2Da88tjUNF67GzyEtCOqun9PyO-AUY1hhc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733185139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of cost sharing on prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Goedken, Amber M. ; Urmie, Julie M. ; Farris, Karen B. ; Doucette, William R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goedken, Amber M. ; Urmie, Julie M. ; Farris, Karen B. ; Doucette, William R.</creatorcontrib><description>Incentive-based prescription drug cost sharing can encourage seniors to use generic medications. Little information exists about prescription drug cost sharing and generic use in employer-sponsored plans after the implementation of Medicare Part D. To compare prescription drug cost sharing across prescription insurance type for Medicare beneficiaries after Medicare Part D, to assess the impact of that cost sharing on the number of medications used, and to examine how generic utilization rates differ before and after Medicare Part D and across the type of insurance. This longitudinal study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older used Web-based surveys administered in 2005 and 2007 by Harris Interactive ® to collect information on prescription drug coverage and medication use. Co-payment plans were categorized as low, medium, or high co-payment plans. Multiple regression was used to assess the impact of co-payment rank on the number of prescription drugs. t-Tests and analysis of variance were used to compare generic use over time and between coverage types. One thousand two hundred twenty and 1024 respondents completed the baseline and follow-up surveys, respectively. Among 3-tier co-payment plans, brand drug co-payments were higher for Part D plans ($26 for preferred brand and $55 for nonpreferred brand) than employer-based plans ($20 for preferred brand and $39 for nonpreferred brand). Co-payment was not a significant predictor for the number of prescription drugs. Generic use was lowest among beneficiaries in employer plans both before and after Part D. In 2007, generic use among beneficiaries with Part D was not significantly different from the generic use for beneficiaries with no drug coverage. Medicare beneficiaries in Part D had higher cost sharing amounts than those with employer coverage, but higher cost sharing was not significantly linked to lower prescription use. Generic use for Part D beneficiaries was higher than that for beneficiaries with employer coverage but the same as that for beneficiaries without drug coverage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-7411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20511109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Community Pharmacy Services - economics ; Cost Control ; Cost Sharing - economics ; Drug Costs ; Drugs, Generic - economics ; Eligibility Determination ; Employer Health Costs ; Financing, Personal ; Generic drugs ; Health Care Reform ; Health Care Surveys ; Health Services Accessibility - economics ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Income ; Insurance Coverage - economics ; Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services - economics ; Longitudinal Studies ; Medicare Part D ; Medicare Part D - economics ; Prescription cost sharing ; Prescription drug use ; Prescription Drugs - economics ; Retrospective Studies ; United States</subject><ispartof>Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 2010-06, Vol.6 (2), p.100-109</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-7a58c2f377dc8b15ba0f3a242f8a16499205fb0bac2211eb2c750f654e8912bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-7a58c2f377dc8b15ba0f3a242f8a16499205fb0bac2211eb2c750f654e8912bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20511109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goedken, Amber M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urmie, Julie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Karen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doucette, William R.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of cost sharing on prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries</title><title>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</title><addtitle>Res Social Adm Pharm</addtitle><description>Incentive-based prescription drug cost sharing can encourage seniors to use generic medications. Little information exists about prescription drug cost sharing and generic use in employer-sponsored plans after the implementation of Medicare Part D. To compare prescription drug cost sharing across prescription insurance type for Medicare beneficiaries after Medicare Part D, to assess the impact of that cost sharing on the number of medications used, and to examine how generic utilization rates differ before and after Medicare Part D and across the type of insurance. This longitudinal study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older used Web-based surveys administered in 2005 and 2007 by Harris Interactive ® to collect information on prescription drug coverage and medication use. Co-payment plans were categorized as low, medium, or high co-payment plans. Multiple regression was used to assess the impact of co-payment rank on the number of prescription drugs. t-Tests and analysis of variance were used to compare generic use over time and between coverage types. One thousand two hundred twenty and 1024 respondents completed the baseline and follow-up surveys, respectively. Among 3-tier co-payment plans, brand drug co-payments were higher for Part D plans ($26 for preferred brand and $55 for nonpreferred brand) than employer-based plans ($20 for preferred brand and $39 for nonpreferred brand). Co-payment was not a significant predictor for the number of prescription drugs. Generic use was lowest among beneficiaries in employer plans both before and after Part D. In 2007, generic use among beneficiaries with Part D was not significantly different from the generic use for beneficiaries with no drug coverage. Medicare beneficiaries in Part D had higher cost sharing amounts than those with employer coverage, but higher cost sharing was not significantly linked to lower prescription use. Generic use for Part D beneficiaries was higher than that for beneficiaries with employer coverage but the same as that for beneficiaries without drug coverage.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Community Pharmacy Services - economics</subject><subject>Cost Control</subject><subject>Cost Sharing - economics</subject><subject>Drug Costs</subject><subject>Drugs, Generic - economics</subject><subject>Eligibility Determination</subject><subject>Employer Health Costs</subject><subject>Financing, Personal</subject><subject>Generic drugs</subject><subject>Health Care Reform</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - economics</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage - economics</subject><subject>Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services - economics</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Medicare Part D</subject><subject>Medicare Part D - economics</subject><subject>Prescription cost sharing</subject><subject>Prescription drug use</subject><subject>Prescription Drugs - economics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1551-7411</issn><issn>1934-8150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PxCAQhonR6PrxEzTcPLUyULbtyRjjx8Y1XvRMgA7KZvshtCb778Xs6tUTA3neGeYh5BxYDgzmV6s86uFDhzbnLL0xkTMm9sgMalFkFUi2n2opISsLgCNyHOMqASWD4pAccSYBgNUz8rRoB21H2jtq-zjSmFr67p32HR0CRhv8MPp0acL0HukUsaFmQ5-x8VYHpAY7dN76FMJ4Sg6cXkc8250n5O3-7vX2MVu-PCxub5aZFfNizEotK8udKMvGVgak0cwJzQvuKg3zoq7T75xhRlvOAdBwW0rm5rLAqgZujDghl9u-Q-g_J4yjan20uF7rDvspqlIIqCSIOpFyS9rQxxjQqSH4VoeNAqZ-NKqV2mlUPxoVEypZSrmL3YTJtNj8pX69JeB6C2Da88tjUNF67GzyEtCOqun9PyO-AUY1hhc</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Goedken, Amber M.</creator><creator>Urmie, Julie M.</creator><creator>Farris, Karen B.</creator><creator>Doucette, William R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Impact of cost sharing on prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries</title><author>Goedken, Amber M. ; Urmie, Julie M. ; Farris, Karen B. ; Doucette, William R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-7a58c2f377dc8b15ba0f3a242f8a16499205fb0bac2211eb2c750f654e8912bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Community Pharmacy Services - economics</topic><topic>Cost Control</topic><topic>Cost Sharing - economics</topic><topic>Drug Costs</topic><topic>Drugs, Generic - economics</topic><topic>Eligibility Determination</topic><topic>Employer Health Costs</topic><topic>Financing, Personal</topic><topic>Generic drugs</topic><topic>Health Care Reform</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - economics</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage - economics</topic><topic>Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services - economics</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Medicare Part D</topic><topic>Medicare Part D - economics</topic><topic>Prescription cost sharing</topic><topic>Prescription drug use</topic><topic>Prescription Drugs - economics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goedken, Amber M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urmie, Julie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Karen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doucette, William R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goedken, Amber M.</au><au>Urmie, Julie M.</au><au>Farris, Karen B.</au><au>Doucette, William R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of cost sharing on prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries</atitle><jtitle>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</jtitle><addtitle>Res Social Adm Pharm</addtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>100-109</pages><issn>1551-7411</issn><eissn>1934-8150</eissn><abstract>Incentive-based prescription drug cost sharing can encourage seniors to use generic medications. Little information exists about prescription drug cost sharing and generic use in employer-sponsored plans after the implementation of Medicare Part D. To compare prescription drug cost sharing across prescription insurance type for Medicare beneficiaries after Medicare Part D, to assess the impact of that cost sharing on the number of medications used, and to examine how generic utilization rates differ before and after Medicare Part D and across the type of insurance. This longitudinal study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older used Web-based surveys administered in 2005 and 2007 by Harris Interactive ® to collect information on prescription drug coverage and medication use. Co-payment plans were categorized as low, medium, or high co-payment plans. Multiple regression was used to assess the impact of co-payment rank on the number of prescription drugs. t-Tests and analysis of variance were used to compare generic use over time and between coverage types. One thousand two hundred twenty and 1024 respondents completed the baseline and follow-up surveys, respectively. Among 3-tier co-payment plans, brand drug co-payments were higher for Part D plans ($26 for preferred brand and $55 for nonpreferred brand) than employer-based plans ($20 for preferred brand and $39 for nonpreferred brand). Co-payment was not a significant predictor for the number of prescription drugs. Generic use was lowest among beneficiaries in employer plans both before and after Part D. In 2007, generic use among beneficiaries with Part D was not significantly different from the generic use for beneficiaries with no drug coverage. Medicare beneficiaries in Part D had higher cost sharing amounts than those with employer coverage, but higher cost sharing was not significantly linked to lower prescription use. Generic use for Part D beneficiaries was higher than that for beneficiaries with employer coverage but the same as that for beneficiaries without drug coverage.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20511109</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.03.003</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-7411
ispartof Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 2010-06, Vol.6 (2), p.100-109
issn 1551-7411
1934-8150
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733185139
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Aged
Community Pharmacy Services - economics
Cost Control
Cost Sharing - economics
Drug Costs
Drugs, Generic - economics
Eligibility Determination
Employer Health Costs
Financing, Personal
Generic drugs
Health Care Reform
Health Care Surveys
Health Services Accessibility - economics
Health Services Research
Humans
Income
Insurance Coverage - economics
Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services - economics
Longitudinal Studies
Medicare Part D
Medicare Part D - economics
Prescription cost sharing
Prescription drug use
Prescription Drugs - economics
Retrospective Studies
United States
title Impact of cost sharing on prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A17%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20cost%20sharing%20on%20prescription%20drugs%20used%20by%20Medicare%20beneficiaries&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20social%20and%20administrative%20pharmacy&rft.au=Goedken,%20Amber%20M.&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=100-109&rft.issn=1551-7411&rft.eissn=1934-8150&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733185139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-7a58c2f377dc8b15ba0f3a242f8a16499205fb0bac2211eb2c750f654e8912bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733185139&rft_id=info:pmid/20511109&rfr_iscdi=true