Loading…
Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective
A series of hypotheses is presented about the relation of national energy use to national economic activity (both time series and cross-sectional) which offer a different perspective from standard economics for the assessment of historical and current economic events. The analysis incorporates nearl...
Saved in:
Published in: | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 1984-08, Vol.225 (4665), p.890-897 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-810205e9f22624df743b0079c59b4976f91b3877c2b259dc21232ffe7feb6c703 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-810205e9f22624df743b0079c59b4976f91b3877c2b259dc21232ffe7feb6c703 |
container_end_page | 897 |
container_issue | 4665 |
container_start_page | 890 |
container_title | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) |
container_volume | 225 |
creator | Cleveland, Cutler J. Costanza, Robert Charles A. S. Hall Kaufmann, Robert |
description | A series of hypotheses is presented about the relation of national energy use to national economic activity (both time series and cross-sectional) which offer a different perspective from standard economics for the assessment of historical and current economic events. The analysis incorporates nearly 100 years of time series data and 3 years of cross-sectional data on 87 sectors of the United States economy. Gross national product, labor productivity, and price levels are all correlated closely with various aspects of energy use, and these correlations are improved when corrections are made for energy quality. A large portion of the apparent increase in U.S. energy efficiency has been due to our ability to expand the relative use of highquality fuels such as petroleum and electricity, and also to relative shifts in fuel use between sectors of the economy. The concept of energy return on investment is introduced as a major driving force in our economy, and data are provided which show a marked decline in energy return on investment for all our principal fuels in recent decades. Future economic growth will depend largely on the net energy yield of alternative fuel sources, and some standard economic models may need to be modified to account for the biophysical constraints on human economic activity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1126/science.225.4665.890 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733199220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A3406550</galeid><jstor_id>1693932</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A3406550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-810205e9f22624df743b0079c59b4976f91b3877c2b259dc21232ffe7feb6c703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0l1r2zAUBmAxNtas2z8ow3e9aO3pw5Ks3aUhywphGfTjVtjyketiW5nkjObfTyGBdpCLoAuBznMEh_MidEFwRggV34JpYTCQUcqzXAieFQq_QxOCFU8Vxew9mmDMRFpgyc_QpxCeMY41xT6iMyKlVEVeTJCYD-CbbVIOdTI-QfKQ3WXJ3LjB9dvvyTS5ad36aRtaU3bJb_BhDWZs_8Jn9MGWXYAvh_scPfyY389-psvV4nY2XaZGYDymBcEUc1CWUkHz2sqcVRhLZbiqciWFVaRihZSGVpSr2lBCGbUWpIVKGInZObrc_7v27s8Gwqj7NhjounIAtwlaMkaUonQnr_ayKTvQ7WDd6EvTQByv7NwAto3PU5ZjwflOXx_R8dTQt-YIv_yPRzHCy9iUmxD07d2vU-Xq8VR5szhRFovlW3l1TBrXddCAjquZrd7qfK-NdyF4sHrt2770W02w3mVMHzKmY8b0LmM6Ziy2fT3sZFP1UL82HUIVwcUePIfR-de6UEwxyv4BLKjRSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733199220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective</title><source>Science Magazine</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Cleveland, Cutler J. ; Costanza, Robert ; Charles A. S. Hall ; Kaufmann, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, Cutler J. ; Costanza, Robert ; Charles A. S. Hall ; Kaufmann, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>A series of hypotheses is presented about the relation of national energy use to national economic activity (both time series and cross-sectional) which offer a different perspective from standard economics for the assessment of historical and current economic events. The analysis incorporates nearly 100 years of time series data and 3 years of cross-sectional data on 87 sectors of the United States economy. Gross national product, labor productivity, and price levels are all correlated closely with various aspects of energy use, and these correlations are improved when corrections are made for energy quality. A large portion of the apparent increase in U.S. energy efficiency has been due to our ability to expand the relative use of highquality fuels such as petroleum and electricity, and also to relative shifts in fuel use between sectors of the economy. The concept of energy return on investment is introduced as a major driving force in our economy, and data are provided which show a marked decline in energy return on investment for all our principal fuels in recent decades. Future economic growth will depend largely on the net energy yield of alternative fuel sources, and some standard economic models may need to be modified to account for the biophysical constraints on human economic activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.225.4665.890</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17779848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Association for the Advancement of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Commercial production ; Discovery and exploration ; Economic aspects ; Economic costs ; Economic models ; Energy ; Energy consumption ; Fossil fuels ; Fuel efficiency ; Fuel oil ; Fuel oils ; Fuels ; Gross national product ; Industrial productivity ; Macroeconomics ; Natural resources ; Nuclear fuels ; Petroleum ; Petroleum industry ; Statistics ; Supply and demand</subject><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 1984-08, Vol.225 (4665), p.890-897</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1984 The American Association for the Advancement of Science</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1984 American Association for the Advancement of Science</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1984 American Association for the Advancement of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-810205e9f22624df743b0079c59b4976f91b3877c2b259dc21232ffe7feb6c703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-810205e9f22624df743b0079c59b4976f91b3877c2b259dc21232ffe7feb6c703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1693932$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1693932$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2871,2872,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17779848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, Cutler J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costanza, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles A. S. Hall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><addtitle>Science</addtitle><description>A series of hypotheses is presented about the relation of national energy use to national economic activity (both time series and cross-sectional) which offer a different perspective from standard economics for the assessment of historical and current economic events. The analysis incorporates nearly 100 years of time series data and 3 years of cross-sectional data on 87 sectors of the United States economy. Gross national product, labor productivity, and price levels are all correlated closely with various aspects of energy use, and these correlations are improved when corrections are made for energy quality. A large portion of the apparent increase in U.S. energy efficiency has been due to our ability to expand the relative use of highquality fuels such as petroleum and electricity, and also to relative shifts in fuel use between sectors of the economy. The concept of energy return on investment is introduced as a major driving force in our economy, and data are provided which show a marked decline in energy return on investment for all our principal fuels in recent decades. Future economic growth will depend largely on the net energy yield of alternative fuel sources, and some standard economic models may need to be modified to account for the biophysical constraints on human economic activity.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Commercial production</subject><subject>Discovery and exploration</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic costs</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Fuel efficiency</subject><subject>Fuel oil</subject><subject>Fuel oils</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Gross national product</subject><subject>Industrial productivity</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Nuclear fuels</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Petroleum industry</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Supply and demand</subject><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0l1r2zAUBmAxNtas2z8ow3e9aO3pw5Ks3aUhywphGfTjVtjyketiW5nkjObfTyGBdpCLoAuBznMEh_MidEFwRggV34JpYTCQUcqzXAieFQq_QxOCFU8Vxew9mmDMRFpgyc_QpxCeMY41xT6iMyKlVEVeTJCYD-CbbVIOdTI-QfKQ3WXJ3LjB9dvvyTS5ad36aRtaU3bJb_BhDWZs_8Jn9MGWXYAvh_scPfyY389-psvV4nY2XaZGYDymBcEUc1CWUkHz2sqcVRhLZbiqciWFVaRihZSGVpSr2lBCGbUWpIVKGInZObrc_7v27s8Gwqj7NhjounIAtwlaMkaUonQnr_ayKTvQ7WDd6EvTQByv7NwAto3PU5ZjwflOXx_R8dTQt-YIv_yPRzHCy9iUmxD07d2vU-Xq8VR5szhRFovlW3l1TBrXddCAjquZrd7qfK-NdyF4sHrt2770W02w3mVMHzKmY8b0LmM6Ziy2fT3sZFP1UL82HUIVwcUePIfR-de6UEwxyv4BLKjRSQ</recordid><startdate>19840831</startdate><enddate>19840831</enddate><creator>Cleveland, Cutler J.</creator><creator>Costanza, Robert</creator><creator>Charles A. S. Hall</creator><creator>Kaufmann, Robert</creator><general>The American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><general>American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840831</creationdate><title>Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective</title><author>Cleveland, Cutler J. ; Costanza, Robert ; Charles A. S. Hall ; Kaufmann, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-810205e9f22624df743b0079c59b4976f91b3877c2b259dc21232ffe7feb6c703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Commercial production</topic><topic>Discovery and exploration</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic costs</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Fuel efficiency</topic><topic>Fuel oil</topic><topic>Fuel oils</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Gross national product</topic><topic>Industrial productivity</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Nuclear fuels</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Petroleum industry</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Supply and demand</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, Cutler J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costanza, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles A. S. Hall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Biography (Gale in Context)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cleveland, Cutler J.</au><au>Costanza, Robert</au><au>Charles A. S. Hall</au><au>Kaufmann, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><addtitle>Science</addtitle><date>1984-08-31</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>225</volume><issue>4665</issue><spage>890</spage><epage>897</epage><pages>890-897</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><abstract>A series of hypotheses is presented about the relation of national energy use to national economic activity (both time series and cross-sectional) which offer a different perspective from standard economics for the assessment of historical and current economic events. The analysis incorporates nearly 100 years of time series data and 3 years of cross-sectional data on 87 sectors of the United States economy. Gross national product, labor productivity, and price levels are all correlated closely with various aspects of energy use, and these correlations are improved when corrections are made for energy quality. A large portion of the apparent increase in U.S. energy efficiency has been due to our ability to expand the relative use of highquality fuels such as petroleum and electricity, and also to relative shifts in fuel use between sectors of the economy. The concept of energy return on investment is introduced as a major driving force in our economy, and data are provided which show a marked decline in energy return on investment for all our principal fuels in recent decades. Future economic growth will depend largely on the net energy yield of alternative fuel sources, and some standard economic models may need to be modified to account for the biophysical constraints on human economic activity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Association for the Advancement of Science</pub><pmid>17779848</pmid><doi>10.1126/science.225.4665.890</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-8075 |
ispartof | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 1984-08, Vol.225 (4665), p.890-897 |
issn | 0036-8075 1095-9203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733199220 |
source | Science Magazine; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Analysis Commercial production Discovery and exploration Economic aspects Economic costs Economic models Energy Energy consumption Fossil fuels Fuel efficiency Fuel oil Fuel oils Fuels Gross national product Industrial productivity Macroeconomics Natural resources Nuclear fuels Petroleum Petroleum industry Statistics Supply and demand |
title | Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A57%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy%20and%20the%20U.S.%20Economy:%20A%20Biophysical%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Cleveland,%20Cutler%20J.&rft.date=1984-08-31&rft.volume=225&rft.issue=4665&rft.spage=890&rft.epage=897&rft.pages=890-897&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.225.4665.890&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA3406550%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-810205e9f22624df743b0079c59b4976f91b3877c2b259dc21232ffe7feb6c703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733199220&rft_id=info:pmid/17779848&rft_galeid=A3406550&rft_jstor_id=1693932&rfr_iscdi=true |