Loading…

Loratadine and montelukast administered in combination produce decongestion in an experimental feline model of nasal congestion

Histamine and leukotrienes act to exert numerous local and systemic effects that contribute to the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis. The aim of these experiments was to evaluate the nasal decongestant effects of loratadine and montelukast alone and in combination in a feline model of nasal conge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of rhinology & allergy 2009-11, Vol.23 (6), p.e17-e22
Main Authors: McLeod, Robbie L, Mingo, Garfield G, Xu, Xiaoying, Palamanda, Jairam, Hunter, John C, Jia, Yanlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d9d3c54d627c262b8c110939fc18594754549576e78b9770b7943fc15e236d783
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d9d3c54d627c262b8c110939fc18594754549576e78b9770b7943fc15e236d783
container_end_page e22
container_issue 6
container_start_page e17
container_title American journal of rhinology & allergy
container_volume 23
creator McLeod, Robbie L
Mingo, Garfield G
Xu, Xiaoying
Palamanda, Jairam
Hunter, John C
Jia, Yanlin
description Histamine and leukotrienes act to exert numerous local and systemic effects that contribute to the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis. The aim of these experiments was to evaluate the nasal decongestant effects of loratadine and montelukast alone and in combination in a feline model of nasal congestion. We also studied the decongestant actions of the alpha-agonist adrenergic agonist D-pseudoephedrine with and without desloratadine. Acoustic rhinometry was used to determine nasal cavity dimensions after intranasal compound 48/80. Cats were given D-pseudoephedrine (0.3 mg/kg) alone or in combination with desloratadine (5 mg/kg) 1 hour before nasal provocation with compound 48/80 (1%, 75 microliters) to either the left or right nasal passageway. Using a similar design, the nasal decongestant effects of montelukast (1 mg/kg) and loratadine (10 mg/kg) were studied alone and in combination. The addition of desloratadine to D-pseudoephedrine did not improve decongestant efficacy compared with each drug given individually. In contrast, when montelukast (1 mg/kg) was given in combination with loratadine (10 mg/kg), the decongestant activity was greater than when these drugs were administered separately. Sixty minutes after compound 48/80 provocation the nasal cavity volume ratio (volume ratio of the compound 48/80 treated/untreated nasal passageway) for the control, montelukast alone, loratadine alone, and the montelukast plus loratadine-treated groups were 0.20 +/- 0.03, 0.24 +/- 0.01, 0.28 +/- 0.03, and 0.50 +/- 0.03. Concomitant montelukast plus loratadine produces a greater degree of nasal decongestion compared with montelukast or loratadine alone in an experimental model of nasal congestion.
doi_str_mv 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3365
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733229023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733229023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d9d3c54d627c262b8c110939fc18594754549576e78b9770b7943fc15e236d783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAWyQd6wS_IjjeIkqXlIlNrC2HHuCUhK7xIkEK34dh1awmtH43jueg9AlJTkThNyY7WByRojKGc85L8URWlJViKxSnB3_9axYoLMYt4SUhSjoKVpQJUslVbVE35swmNG41gM23uE--BG66d3EERvXt76NIwzgcOuxDX3dejO2wePdENxkATuwwb9B_B0mjfEYPncwtD340XS4gW6O7oODDocGexPT9N9zjk4a00W4ONQVer2_e1k_Zpvnh6f17SaznJAxc8pxKwpXMmlZyerKUkoUV42llVCFFOkwJWQJsqqVlKSWquDpUQDjpZMVX6HrfW76-MeUduu-jRa6zngIU9SSc8YUYTwp6V5phxDjAI3epWvM8KUp0TN2PWPXM3bNuJ6xJ8_VIX2qe3D_jgNn_gMoJICs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733229023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Loratadine and montelukast administered in combination produce decongestion in an experimental feline model of nasal congestion</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>McLeod, Robbie L ; Mingo, Garfield G ; Xu, Xiaoying ; Palamanda, Jairam ; Hunter, John C ; Jia, Yanlin</creator><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Robbie L ; Mingo, Garfield G ; Xu, Xiaoying ; Palamanda, Jairam ; Hunter, John C ; Jia, Yanlin</creatorcontrib><description>Histamine and leukotrienes act to exert numerous local and systemic effects that contribute to the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis. The aim of these experiments was to evaluate the nasal decongestant effects of loratadine and montelukast alone and in combination in a feline model of nasal congestion. We also studied the decongestant actions of the alpha-agonist adrenergic agonist D-pseudoephedrine with and without desloratadine. Acoustic rhinometry was used to determine nasal cavity dimensions after intranasal compound 48/80. Cats were given D-pseudoephedrine (0.3 mg/kg) alone or in combination with desloratadine (5 mg/kg) 1 hour before nasal provocation with compound 48/80 (1%, 75 microliters) to either the left or right nasal passageway. Using a similar design, the nasal decongestant effects of montelukast (1 mg/kg) and loratadine (10 mg/kg) were studied alone and in combination. The addition of desloratadine to D-pseudoephedrine did not improve decongestant efficacy compared with each drug given individually. In contrast, when montelukast (1 mg/kg) was given in combination with loratadine (10 mg/kg), the decongestant activity was greater than when these drugs were administered separately. Sixty minutes after compound 48/80 provocation the nasal cavity volume ratio (volume ratio of the compound 48/80 treated/untreated nasal passageway) for the control, montelukast alone, loratadine alone, and the montelukast plus loratadine-treated groups were 0.20 +/- 0.03, 0.24 +/- 0.01, 0.28 +/- 0.03, and 0.50 +/- 0.03. Concomitant montelukast plus loratadine produces a greater degree of nasal decongestion compared with montelukast or loratadine alone in an experimental model of nasal congestion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1945-8924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-8932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3365</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19769798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Acetates - administration & dosage ; Animals ; Cats ; Disease Models, Animal ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Leukotriene Antagonists - administration & dosage ; Loratadine - administration & dosage ; Loratadine - analogs & derivatives ; Male ; Nasal Cavity - anatomy & histology ; Nasal Cavity - drug effects ; Nasal Obstruction - drug therapy ; Nasal Obstruction - physiopathology ; Nasal Provocation Tests ; Pseudoephedrine - administration & dosage ; Quinolines - administration & dosage ; Rhinometry, Acoustic ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>American journal of rhinology &amp; allergy, 2009-11, Vol.23 (6), p.e17-e22</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d9d3c54d627c262b8c110939fc18594754549576e78b9770b7943fc15e236d783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d9d3c54d627c262b8c110939fc18594754549576e78b9770b7943fc15e236d783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19769798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Robbie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mingo, Garfield G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palamanda, Jairam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Yanlin</creatorcontrib><title>Loratadine and montelukast administered in combination produce decongestion in an experimental feline model of nasal congestion</title><title>American journal of rhinology &amp; allergy</title><addtitle>Am J Rhinol Allergy</addtitle><description>Histamine and leukotrienes act to exert numerous local and systemic effects that contribute to the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis. The aim of these experiments was to evaluate the nasal decongestant effects of loratadine and montelukast alone and in combination in a feline model of nasal congestion. We also studied the decongestant actions of the alpha-agonist adrenergic agonist D-pseudoephedrine with and without desloratadine. Acoustic rhinometry was used to determine nasal cavity dimensions after intranasal compound 48/80. Cats were given D-pseudoephedrine (0.3 mg/kg) alone or in combination with desloratadine (5 mg/kg) 1 hour before nasal provocation with compound 48/80 (1%, 75 microliters) to either the left or right nasal passageway. Using a similar design, the nasal decongestant effects of montelukast (1 mg/kg) and loratadine (10 mg/kg) were studied alone and in combination. The addition of desloratadine to D-pseudoephedrine did not improve decongestant efficacy compared with each drug given individually. In contrast, when montelukast (1 mg/kg) was given in combination with loratadine (10 mg/kg), the decongestant activity was greater than when these drugs were administered separately. Sixty minutes after compound 48/80 provocation the nasal cavity volume ratio (volume ratio of the compound 48/80 treated/untreated nasal passageway) for the control, montelukast alone, loratadine alone, and the montelukast plus loratadine-treated groups were 0.20 +/- 0.03, 0.24 +/- 0.01, 0.28 +/- 0.03, and 0.50 +/- 0.03. Concomitant montelukast plus loratadine produces a greater degree of nasal decongestion compared with montelukast or loratadine alone in an experimental model of nasal congestion.</description><subject>Acetates - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leukotriene Antagonists - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Loratadine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Loratadine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nasal Cavity - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Nasal Cavity - drug effects</subject><subject>Nasal Obstruction - drug therapy</subject><subject>Nasal Obstruction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Nasal Provocation Tests</subject><subject>Pseudoephedrine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Quinolines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Rhinometry, Acoustic</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1945-8924</issn><issn>1945-8932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAWyQd6wS_IjjeIkqXlIlNrC2HHuCUhK7xIkEK34dh1awmtH43jueg9AlJTkThNyY7WByRojKGc85L8URWlJViKxSnB3_9axYoLMYt4SUhSjoKVpQJUslVbVE35swmNG41gM23uE--BG66d3EERvXt76NIwzgcOuxDX3dejO2wePdENxkATuwwb9B_B0mjfEYPncwtD340XS4gW6O7oODDocGexPT9N9zjk4a00W4ONQVer2_e1k_Zpvnh6f17SaznJAxc8pxKwpXMmlZyerKUkoUV42llVCFFOkwJWQJsqqVlKSWquDpUQDjpZMVX6HrfW76-MeUduu-jRa6zngIU9SSc8YUYTwp6V5phxDjAI3epWvM8KUp0TN2PWPXM3bNuJ6xJ8_VIX2qe3D_jgNn_gMoJICs</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>McLeod, Robbie L</creator><creator>Mingo, Garfield G</creator><creator>Xu, Xiaoying</creator><creator>Palamanda, Jairam</creator><creator>Hunter, John C</creator><creator>Jia, Yanlin</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Loratadine and montelukast administered in combination produce decongestion in an experimental feline model of nasal congestion</title><author>McLeod, Robbie L ; Mingo, Garfield G ; Xu, Xiaoying ; Palamanda, Jairam ; Hunter, John C ; Jia, Yanlin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d9d3c54d627c262b8c110939fc18594754549576e78b9770b7943fc15e236d783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Acetates - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leukotriene Antagonists - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Loratadine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Loratadine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nasal Cavity - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Nasal Cavity - drug effects</topic><topic>Nasal Obstruction - drug therapy</topic><topic>Nasal Obstruction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Nasal Provocation Tests</topic><topic>Pseudoephedrine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Quinolines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Rhinometry, Acoustic</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Robbie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mingo, Garfield G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palamanda, Jairam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Yanlin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of rhinology &amp; allergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McLeod, Robbie L</au><au>Mingo, Garfield G</au><au>Xu, Xiaoying</au><au>Palamanda, Jairam</au><au>Hunter, John C</au><au>Jia, Yanlin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Loratadine and montelukast administered in combination produce decongestion in an experimental feline model of nasal congestion</atitle><jtitle>American journal of rhinology &amp; allergy</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Rhinol Allergy</addtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e17</spage><epage>e22</epage><pages>e17-e22</pages><issn>1945-8924</issn><eissn>1945-8932</eissn><abstract>Histamine and leukotrienes act to exert numerous local and systemic effects that contribute to the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis. The aim of these experiments was to evaluate the nasal decongestant effects of loratadine and montelukast alone and in combination in a feline model of nasal congestion. We also studied the decongestant actions of the alpha-agonist adrenergic agonist D-pseudoephedrine with and without desloratadine. Acoustic rhinometry was used to determine nasal cavity dimensions after intranasal compound 48/80. Cats were given D-pseudoephedrine (0.3 mg/kg) alone or in combination with desloratadine (5 mg/kg) 1 hour before nasal provocation with compound 48/80 (1%, 75 microliters) to either the left or right nasal passageway. Using a similar design, the nasal decongestant effects of montelukast (1 mg/kg) and loratadine (10 mg/kg) were studied alone and in combination. The addition of desloratadine to D-pseudoephedrine did not improve decongestant efficacy compared with each drug given individually. In contrast, when montelukast (1 mg/kg) was given in combination with loratadine (10 mg/kg), the decongestant activity was greater than when these drugs were administered separately. Sixty minutes after compound 48/80 provocation the nasal cavity volume ratio (volume ratio of the compound 48/80 treated/untreated nasal passageway) for the control, montelukast alone, loratadine alone, and the montelukast plus loratadine-treated groups were 0.20 +/- 0.03, 0.24 +/- 0.01, 0.28 +/- 0.03, and 0.50 +/- 0.03. Concomitant montelukast plus loratadine produces a greater degree of nasal decongestion compared with montelukast or loratadine alone in an experimental model of nasal congestion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>19769798</pmid><doi>10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3365</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1945-8924
ispartof American journal of rhinology & allergy, 2009-11, Vol.23 (6), p.e17-e22
issn 1945-8924
1945-8932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733229023
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Acetates - administration & dosage
Animals
Cats
Disease Models, Animal
Drug Therapy, Combination
Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating - administration & dosage
Humans
Leukotriene Antagonists - administration & dosage
Loratadine - administration & dosage
Loratadine - analogs & derivatives
Male
Nasal Cavity - anatomy & histology
Nasal Cavity - drug effects
Nasal Obstruction - drug therapy
Nasal Obstruction - physiopathology
Nasal Provocation Tests
Pseudoephedrine - administration & dosage
Quinolines - administration & dosage
Rhinometry, Acoustic
Treatment Outcome
title Loratadine and montelukast administered in combination produce decongestion in an experimental feline model of nasal congestion
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A43%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Loratadine%20and%20montelukast%20administered%20in%20combination%20produce%20decongestion%20in%20an%20experimental%20feline%20model%20of%20nasal%20congestion&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20rhinology%20&%20allergy&rft.au=McLeod,%20Robbie%20L&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e17&rft.epage=e22&rft.pages=e17-e22&rft.issn=1945-8924&rft.eissn=1945-8932&rft_id=info:doi/10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3365&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733229023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d9d3c54d627c262b8c110939fc18594754549576e78b9770b7943fc15e236d783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733229023&rft_id=info:pmid/19769798&rfr_iscdi=true