Visual assessment of the timing of bruising by forensic experts

Abstract Introduction Forensic experts are frequently asked to comment on the age of injuries and interpretation may have significant medico-legal consequences. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy with which forensic experts can visually age a bruise from photographs produced unde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of forensic and legal medicine 2010-04, Vol.17 (3), p.143-149
Main Authors: Pilling, M.L., BMedSci (Hons), Vanezis, P., OBE PhD FRCPath, Perrett, D., PhD CChem FRSC, Johnston, A., PhD FRCPath
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accuracy
Age
Ageing
Bruising
Contusions - pathology
Crime laboratories
Female
Forensic experts
Forensic Pathology
Forensic sciences
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Injuries
Legal medicine
Male
Observer Variation
Pathology
Photography
Skin
Time Factors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction Forensic experts are frequently asked to comment on the age of injuries and interpretation may have significant medico-legal consequences. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy with which forensic experts can visually age a bruise from photographs produced under standard conditions. Methods Bruises were produced on the upper arms of 11 subjects by a suction pump. Sequential photographs were taken daily until they were no longer visible to the naked eye. Fifteen forensic experts who did not know the age of the bruises were asked to estimate their ages and also to place them in chronological order. Results Hundred and thirty-two images of 25 bruises were produced, ranging from 0 to 209 h in age. There was considerable inter- and intra-observer variability in accuracy (median difference between the estimated age and the real age = 26.0 h (95% C.I. 24.0–31.0 h). There was greatest accuracy for bruises photographed between 0 and 12 h. No significant differences were seen between male and female observers ( p = 0.553) and performance was also unaffected by the age of the observer ( p = 0.160). Of the bruise images placed in chronological order >80% of the observers made between 0 and 2 errors. Conclusion Bruise age estimates by forensic experts, from photographs, are unreliable. However, it appears that the vast majority of observers are better able to place bruises from the same subjects in their chronological order.
ISSN:1752-928X
1878-7487
DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2009.10.002