Loading…

Apoptosis as a Mechanism for the Elimination of Cardiomyocytes After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Apoptosis is recognized as a mechanism of cell loss in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Whether it contributes to myocyte elimination late after AMI has not yet been confirmed. We attempted to identify the features of apoptosis in myocytes that survived AMI. A search for ongoing apo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2010-05, Vol.105 (9), p.1240-1245
Main Authors: Prech, Marek, MD, Marszałek, Andrzej, MD, PhD, Schröder, Josef, PhD, MSc, Filas, Violetta, MSc, Lesiak, Maciej, MD, PhD, Jemielity, Marek, MD, PhD, Araszkiewicz, Aleksander, MD, Grajek, Stefan, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Apoptosis is recognized as a mechanism of cell loss in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Whether it contributes to myocyte elimination late after AMI has not yet been confirmed. We attempted to identify the features of apoptosis in myocytes that survived AMI. A search for ongoing apoptosis was performed in samples obtained from 38 human hearts: group I (n = 10), noncardiac death (control); and group II (n = 28), left ventricular aneurysm (in 20 patients, the samples were collected during aneurysmectomy and from 8 at autopsy). The morphometric evaluation included the degree of cellular hypertrophy, density of the capillary network, extent of myocytolysis, and features of apoptosis. Immunohistochemistry for caspase-3 and Bcl-2 was used as a prerequisite for transmission electron microscopy. Slides showing the strongest reaction for caspase-3 and negative for Bcl-2 were selected for transmission electron microscopy. CD-34 immunohistochemistry was used to quantify the capillary density. A significant reduction in capillary density was observed compared to the control group (1,085.6 ± 205.0/mm2 vs 2,968.7 ± 457.3/mm2 ; p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.039