Role of sonographic automatic volume calculation in measuring fetal cardiac ventricular volumes using 4-dimensional sonography: comparison with virtual organ computer-aided analysis

• Published in: Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2010-02, Vol.29 (2), p.261-270
• Main Authors: Rizzo, Giuseppe, Capponi, Alessandra, Pietrolucci, Maria Elena, Arduini, Domenico
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques - methods; Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional - methods; Female; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging; Humans; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Male; Organ Size; Pregnancy; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods
• ISSN: 0278-4297; 1550-9613
• DOI: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.2.261

The purpose of this study was to compare the agreement and reliability of virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) and sonographic automatic volume calculation (sonoAVC) for measurements of ventricular volume from fetal heart data sets acquired by 4-dimensional sonography with spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC). We studied 45 volumes from fetuses with normal (n = 30) and abnormal (n = 15) hearts. Spatiotemporal image correlation data sets were frozen in end systole and end diastole, and ventricular volumes were measured with VOCAL and sonoAVC. The stroke volume was calculated from these measurements. Reliability and agreement of the two techniques were evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and proportionate Bland-Altman plots were constructed. The time necessary to complete the measurements with either technique was compared. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement of measurements was calculated. All data sets could be measured with both techniques. A high degree of reliability was observed between VOCAL and sonoAVC (left ventricular stroke volume ICC, 0.978; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.957-0.989; right ventricular stroke volume ICC, 0.985; 95% CI, 0.972-0.992). The time necessary to measure the stroke volume was significantly shorter with sonoAVC (2.8 versus 11.7 minutes; P < .0001) than with VOCAL. Bland-Altman tests showed no clinically significant mean percent differences between stroke volume measurements obtained from each ventricle by the same observer or by 2 independent observers using either VOCAL or sonoAVC. There was good agreement between cardiac volumes measured with VOCAL and sonoAVC. Sonographic automatic volume calculation represents a rapid technique for estimating fetal stroke volume and promises to become the method of choice.