Loading…
Current practice in the management of vasectomy reversal and unobstructive azoospermia in Merseyside & North Wales: a questionnaire‐based survey
OBJECTIVE To investigate the current incidence of vasectomy reversal procedures, the techniques used and which practitioners use them. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using a questionnaire, 130 general surgeons and urologists practising in Merseyside and North Wales were surveyed. RESULTS The response rate was...
Saved in:
Published in: | BJU international 2003-06, Vol.91 (9), p.839-844 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | OBJECTIVE
To investigate the current incidence of vasectomy reversal procedures, the techniques used and which practitioners use them.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Using a questionnaire, 130 general surgeons and urologists practising in Merseyside and North Wales were surveyed.
RESULTS
The response rate was 74%, with 24 urological surgeons and 14 general surgeons undertaking vasectomy reversal. Annually, urological surgeons carried out significantly more procedures than did general surgeons, at 8.5 and 5.3 (P = 0.029), respectively. They were also more likely to use double‐layer closure and microsurgical techniques, whilst significantly less likely to use stents. Urologists reported significantly greater patency rates, at 76% and 52% (P = 0.017), respectively, with no significant differences in subsequent pregnancy rates (30% vs 25%). Only one practitioner checked tubal patency in the female partner before vasectomy reversal.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of vasectomy reversal is a cost‐effective treatment for men wanting paternity after vasectomy. The technique used by the clinician and proper audit of the results require close attention; it would also appear to be obvious that all the partners of men seeking a vasectomy reversal should have their fertility status established before reversal, something that is clearly not done at present. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04227.x |