Loading…
Osteopontin is upregulated in malignant and inflammatory pleural effusions
ABSTRACT Background and objective: Osteopontin (OPN) is an important mediator of inflammation and cancer progression. In the present study, we asked whether pleural fluid (PF) and serum OPN concentrations differed between patients with pleural effusions of different aetiologies, and whether assessm...
Saved in:
Published in: | Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) Vic.), 2009-07, Vol.14 (5), p.716-722 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Background and objective: Osteopontin (OPN) is an important mediator of inflammation and cancer progression. In the present study, we asked whether pleural fluid (PF) and serum OPN concentrations differed between patients with pleural effusions of different aetiologies, and whether assessment of OPN levels was useful for diagnostic purposes.
Methods: One hundred and nine consecutive patients with pleural effusions of different aetiologies were recruited prospectively during daily clinics. OPN levels were measured by ELISA.
Results: PF OPN levels were 10‐fold higher in exudates than in transudates and were significantly correlated with markers of pleural inflammation and vascular hyper‐permeability, such as PF/serum LDH or protein ratios, PF protein and PF vascular endothelial growth factor levels. Patients with malignant pleural effusions had higher PF and lower serum OPN concentrations than those with benign disease. The diagnostic accuracies of PF and PF/serum OPN for malignancy were 71.5% (95% CI: 64–80) and 70.6% (95% CI: 62–80), respectively.
Conclusions: OPN levels were elevated in exudative pleural effusions, as compared with the levels in blood or transudative pleural effusions. While PF and PF/serum OPN were higher in patients with malignancies, the diagnostic accuracy of the tests was not sufficient to permit routine use in clinical practice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1323-7799 1440-1843 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01536.x |