Loading…

A prospective randomised trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for wound closure after fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s contracture

After fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s contracture the wound has traditionally been closed with non-absorbable sutures. A prospective randomised study of 59 patients was undertaken to compare wound closure after fasciectomy with irradiated polyglactin 910 absorbable sutures and non-absorbable sutures. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of hand surgery, European volume European volume, 2009-10, Vol.34 (5), p.618-620
Main Authors: HOWARD, K., SIMISON, A. J. M., MORRIS, A., BHALAIK, V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:After fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s contracture the wound has traditionally been closed with non-absorbable sutures. A prospective randomised study of 59 patients was undertaken to compare wound closure after fasciectomy with irradiated polyglactin 910 absorbable sutures and non-absorbable sutures. The outcomes studied were: time spent attending to the wound at the first postoperative visit; the patient’s pain score at that visit; and any complications. Wound care required significantly more time when non-absorbable sutures were used. There was no significant difference in pain scores or in complications between the two groups. We recommend the use of irradiated polyglactin 910 absorbable sutures for wound closure after fasciectomy as it saves time and resources without compromising wound healing.
ISSN:1753-1934
2043-6289
DOI:10.1177/1753193409105728