Effective dose analysis of three-dimensional rotational angiography during catheter ablation procedures

• Published in: Physics in medicine & biology 2010-02, Vol.55 (3), p.563-579
• Main Authors: Wielandts, J-Y, Smans, K, Ector, J, De Buck, S, Heidbüchel, H, Bosmans, H
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnostic imaging; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - surgery; Automation; Body Mass Index; Catheter Ablation - methods; Computer Simulation; Coronary Angiography - methods; Female; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Radiation Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods; Rotation; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
• ISSN: 0031-9155; 1361-6560
• DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/3/001

There is increasing use of three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) during cardiac ablation procedures. As compared with 2D angiography, a large series of images are acquired, creating the potential for high radiation doses. The aim of the present study was to quantify patient-specific effective doses. In this study, we developed a computer model to accurately calculate organ doses and the effective dose incurred during 3DRA image acquisition. The computer model simulates the exposure geometry and uses the actual exposure parameters, including the variation in tube voltage and current that is realized through the automatic exposure control (AEC). We performed 3DRA dose calculations in 42 patients referred for ablation on the Siemens Axiom Artis DynaCT system (Erlangen, Germany). Organ doses and effective dose were calculated separately for all projections in the course of the C-arm rotation. The influence of patient body mass index (BMI), dose-area product (DAP), collimation and dose per frame (DPF) rate setting on the calculated doses was also analysed. The effective dose was found to be 5.5 +/- 1.4 mSv according to ICRP 60 and 6.6 +/- 1.8 mSv according to ICRP 103. Effective dose showed an inversely proportional relationship to BMI, while DAP was nearly BMI independent. No simple conversion coefficient between DAP and effective dose could be derived. DPF reduction did not result in a proportional effective dose decrease. These paradoxical findings were explained by the settings of the AEC and the limitations of the x-ray tube. Collimation reduced the effective dose by more than 20%. Three-dimensional rotational angiography is associated with a definite but acceptable radiation dose that can be calculated for all patients separately. Their BMI is a predictor of the effective dose. The dose reduction achieved with collimation suggests that its use is imperative during the 3DRA procedure.