Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report

• Published in: International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2009-12, Vol.38 (12), p.1237-1243
• Main Authors: Wang, X.-X, Wang, X, Li, Z.-L, Yi, B, Liang, C, Jia, Y.-L, Zou, B.-S
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; anterior maxillary segmental distraction; Biological and medical sciences; Cephalometry; Cleft Lip - complications; Cleft Lip - surgery; cleft palate; Cleft Palate - complications; Cleft Palate - surgery; Dental Arch - abnormalities; Dental Arch - pathology; Dental Arch - surgery; dental crowding; Dentistry; External Fixators; Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Internal Fixators; Male; Malocclusion - etiology; Malocclusion - surgery; Mandible - pathology; Maxilla - abnormalities; Maxilla - pathology; Maxilla - surgery; maxillary hypoplasia; Medical sciences; Nasal Cavity - surgery; Non tumoral diseases; Nose - pathology; Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation; Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods; Osteotomy - methods; Osteotomy, Le Fort; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology; Photography, Dental; Sella Turcica - pathology; Surgery; Tooth Movement Techniques - instrumentation; Velopharyngeal Sphincter - pathology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0901-5027; 1399-0020
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.06.028

Abstract To evaluate the feasibility of anterior maxillary segmental distraction (AMSD) to correct maxillary hypoplasia and severe dental crowding in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients, 7 patients (average age 16.4 years) with maxillary hypoplasia, shortened maxillary dental arch length and severe anterior dental crowding secondary to CLP were selected for this study. After anterior maxillary segmental osteotomy, 3 patients were treated using bilateral internal distraction devices, and 4 patients were treated using rigid external distraction devices. Photographs and radiographs were taken to review the improvement in facial profile and occlusion after distraction. An average 10.25 mm anterior maxillary advancement was obtained in all patients after 10–23 days of distraction and 9–16 weeks of consolidation. The sella–nasion–point A (SNA) angle increased from 69.5° to 79.6°. Midface convexity was greatly improved and velopharyngeal competence was preserved. The maxillary dental arch length was greatly increased by 10.1 mm ( P < 0.01). Dental crowding and malocclusion were corrected by orthodontic treatment. These results show that AMSD can effectively correct the hypoplastic maxilla and severe dental crowding associated with CLP by increasing the midface convexity and dental arch length while preserving velopharyngeal function, and dental crowding can be corrected without requiring tooth extraction.