Loading…
A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps
Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a new, noninvasive method for examining the entire colon. The reported yield of CCE in detecting colorectal polyps has shown variable results. Objective To assess the accuracy of CCE by pooling data of existing trials. Design Meta-analysis. The fixed-effec...
Saved in:
Published in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2010-04, Vol.71 (4), p.792-798 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03 |
container_end_page | 798 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 792 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD Ladas, Spiros D., MD |
description | Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a new, noninvasive method for examining the entire colon. The reported yield of CCE in detecting colorectal polyps has shown variable results. Objective To assess the accuracy of CCE by pooling data of existing trials. Design Meta-analysis. The fixed-effects or random-effects model was used as appropriate, based on whether homogeneity or heterogeneity, respectively, was indicated by the Cochran Q test. Setting Studies that estimated the accuracy of CCE were identified. Two investigators independently conducted the search and data extraction. Patients A total of 626 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Intervention Each patient underwent CCE and conventional colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements Per-patient sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Findings were categorized as “significant polyps,” that is, a report of a polyp >6 mm in size or 3 or more polyps of any size, or “any polyp,” that is, a report of any polyp found, independent of size. Pooled data on sensitivity and specificity with a 95% CI were estimated. For any polyp found, the pooled data showed per-patient CCE sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 68%-77%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%). For significant polyps, the respective values were 69% (95% CI, 62%-75%) and 86% (95% CI, 82%-90%). Limitations A small number of studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusion CCE is a reasonable method for screening asymptomatic individuals for colorectal polyps. It may be particularly useful for patients with “incomplete” colonoscopy, those with contraindications for conventional colonoscopy, and those unwilling to undergo colonoscopy because of its perceived inconvenience and discomfort. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.050 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733634270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510709027047</els_id><sourcerecordid>733634270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqD_Aiucieeqykv6YRhGXRVVjwoN6EUJ2uXjNmOm2qe6H_vemdUcGDp3zwvKnUU0K8ULBVoKrX--2do60GaNJ5CyU8EhsFTZ1Vdd08FhtIUFYqqM_EOfMeAHY6V0_FmYa8ygutNuLblTzQhBkO6Bd2LOke_YyTG-7k9J0kWjtHtIsMvbTBh0FaHHn2JGnoAtswLtINsqOJ7EPoCI3BLyM_E0969EzPT-uF-Pr-3ZfrD9ntp5uP11e3mS12MGUdVk2_2-leFbpobLVryrpDVaiScqQWlS1z7AEh7doWVE5tUYHVuuqxpw7yC3F5fHeM4edMPJmDY0ve40BhZlPnD-3WK6mOpI2BOVJvxugOGBejwKxOzd4kp2Z1ul4lpynz8vT63B6o-5P4LTEBr04AskXfRxys47-cTlhT1Il7c-Qoubh3FA1bR4OlzsVkz3TB_fcbb_9JW-8Glwr-oIV4H-aYZshGGdYGzOd1-OvsoYHUeSr_Cx_DqbU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733634270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD ; Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD ; Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD ; Ladas, Spiros D., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD ; Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD ; Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD ; Ladas, Spiros D., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a new, noninvasive method for examining the entire colon. The reported yield of CCE in detecting colorectal polyps has shown variable results. Objective To assess the accuracy of CCE by pooling data of existing trials. Design Meta-analysis. The fixed-effects or random-effects model was used as appropriate, based on whether homogeneity or heterogeneity, respectively, was indicated by the Cochran Q test. Setting Studies that estimated the accuracy of CCE were identified. Two investigators independently conducted the search and data extraction. Patients A total of 626 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Intervention Each patient underwent CCE and conventional colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements Per-patient sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Findings were categorized as “significant polyps,” that is, a report of a polyp >6 mm in size or 3 or more polyps of any size, or “any polyp,” that is, a report of any polyp found, independent of size. Pooled data on sensitivity and specificity with a 95% CI were estimated. For any polyp found, the pooled data showed per-patient CCE sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 68%-77%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%). For significant polyps, the respective values were 69% (95% CI, 62%-75%) and 86% (95% CI, 82%-90%). Limitations A small number of studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusion CCE is a reasonable method for screening asymptomatic individuals for colorectal polyps. It may be particularly useful for patients with “incomplete” colonoscopy, those with contraindications for conventional colonoscopy, and those unwilling to undergo colonoscopy because of its perceived inconvenience and discomfort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20363421</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maryland heights, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Capsule Endoscopy - standards ; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-04, Vol.71 (4), p.792-798</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010. Published by Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22634947$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20363421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladas, Spiros D., MD</creatorcontrib><title>A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a new, noninvasive method for examining the entire colon. The reported yield of CCE in detecting colorectal polyps has shown variable results. Objective To assess the accuracy of CCE by pooling data of existing trials. Design Meta-analysis. The fixed-effects or random-effects model was used as appropriate, based on whether homogeneity or heterogeneity, respectively, was indicated by the Cochran Q test. Setting Studies that estimated the accuracy of CCE were identified. Two investigators independently conducted the search and data extraction. Patients A total of 626 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Intervention Each patient underwent CCE and conventional colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements Per-patient sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Findings were categorized as “significant polyps,” that is, a report of a polyp >6 mm in size or 3 or more polyps of any size, or “any polyp,” that is, a report of any polyp found, independent of size. Pooled data on sensitivity and specificity with a 95% CI were estimated. For any polyp found, the pooled data showed per-patient CCE sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 68%-77%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%). For significant polyps, the respective values were 69% (95% CI, 62%-75%) and 86% (95% CI, 82%-90%). Limitations A small number of studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusion CCE is a reasonable method for screening asymptomatic individuals for colorectal polyps. It may be particularly useful for patients with “incomplete” colonoscopy, those with contraindications for conventional colonoscopy, and those unwilling to undergo colonoscopy because of its perceived inconvenience and discomfort.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqD_Aiucieeqykv6YRhGXRVVjwoN6EUJ2uXjNmOm2qe6H_vemdUcGDp3zwvKnUU0K8ULBVoKrX--2do60GaNJ5CyU8EhsFTZ1Vdd08FhtIUFYqqM_EOfMeAHY6V0_FmYa8ygutNuLblTzQhBkO6Bd2LOke_YyTG-7k9J0kWjtHtIsMvbTBh0FaHHn2JGnoAtswLtINsqOJ7EPoCI3BLyM_E0969EzPT-uF-Pr-3ZfrD9ntp5uP11e3mS12MGUdVk2_2-leFbpobLVryrpDVaiScqQWlS1z7AEh7doWVE5tUYHVuuqxpw7yC3F5fHeM4edMPJmDY0ve40BhZlPnD-3WK6mOpI2BOVJvxugOGBejwKxOzd4kp2Z1ul4lpynz8vT63B6o-5P4LTEBr04AskXfRxys47-cTlhT1Il7c-Qoubh3FA1bR4OlzsVkz3TB_fcbb_9JW-8Glwr-oIV4H-aYZshGGdYGzOd1-OvsoYHUeSr_Cx_DqbU</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD</creator><creator>Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD</creator><creator>Ladas, Spiros D., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps</title><author>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD ; Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD ; Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD ; Ladas, Spiros D., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladas, Spiros D., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD</au><au>Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD</au><au>Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD</au><au>Ladas, Spiros D., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>792</spage><epage>798</epage><pages>792-798</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a new, noninvasive method for examining the entire colon. The reported yield of CCE in detecting colorectal polyps has shown variable results. Objective To assess the accuracy of CCE by pooling data of existing trials. Design Meta-analysis. The fixed-effects or random-effects model was used as appropriate, based on whether homogeneity or heterogeneity, respectively, was indicated by the Cochran Q test. Setting Studies that estimated the accuracy of CCE were identified. Two investigators independently conducted the search and data extraction. Patients A total of 626 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Intervention Each patient underwent CCE and conventional colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements Per-patient sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Findings were categorized as “significant polyps,” that is, a report of a polyp >6 mm in size or 3 or more polyps of any size, or “any polyp,” that is, a report of any polyp found, independent of size. Pooled data on sensitivity and specificity with a 95% CI were estimated. For any polyp found, the pooled data showed per-patient CCE sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 68%-77%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%). For significant polyps, the respective values were 69% (95% CI, 62%-75%) and 86% (95% CI, 82%-90%). Limitations A small number of studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusion CCE is a reasonable method for screening asymptomatic individuals for colorectal polyps. It may be particularly useful for patients with “incomplete” colonoscopy, those with contraindications for conventional colonoscopy, and those unwilling to undergo colonoscopy because of its perceived inconvenience and discomfort.</abstract><cop>Maryland heights, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>20363421</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.050</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-04, Vol.71 (4), p.792-798 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733634270 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Capsule Endoscopy - standards Colonic Polyps - diagnosis Digestive system. Abdomen Endoscopy Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal Gastroenterology and Hepatology Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Sensitivity and Specificity Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Tumors |
title | A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A55%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20meta-analysis%20evaluating%20the%20accuracy%20of%20colon%20capsule%20endoscopy%20in%20detecting%20colon%20polyps&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Rokkas,%20Theodore,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=792&rft.epage=798&rft.pages=792-798&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733634270%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733634270&rft_id=info:pmid/20363421&rfr_iscdi=true |