Loading…

A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps

Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a new, noninvasive method for examining the entire colon. The reported yield of CCE in detecting colorectal polyps has shown variable results. Objective To assess the accuracy of CCE by pooling data of existing trials. Design Meta-analysis. The fixed-effec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2010-04, Vol.71 (4), p.792-798
Main Authors: Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD, Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD, Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD, Ladas, Spiros D., MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03
container_end_page 798
container_issue 4
container_start_page 792
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 71
creator Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD
Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD
Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD
Ladas, Spiros D., MD
description Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a new, noninvasive method for examining the entire colon. The reported yield of CCE in detecting colorectal polyps has shown variable results. Objective To assess the accuracy of CCE by pooling data of existing trials. Design Meta-analysis. The fixed-effects or random-effects model was used as appropriate, based on whether homogeneity or heterogeneity, respectively, was indicated by the Cochran Q test. Setting Studies that estimated the accuracy of CCE were identified. Two investigators independently conducted the search and data extraction. Patients A total of 626 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Intervention Each patient underwent CCE and conventional colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements Per-patient sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Findings were categorized as “significant polyps,” that is, a report of a polyp >6 mm in size or 3 or more polyps of any size, or “any polyp,” that is, a report of any polyp found, independent of size. Pooled data on sensitivity and specificity with a 95% CI were estimated. For any polyp found, the pooled data showed per-patient CCE sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 68%-77%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%). For significant polyps, the respective values were 69% (95% CI, 62%-75%) and 86% (95% CI, 82%-90%). Limitations A small number of studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusion CCE is a reasonable method for screening asymptomatic individuals for colorectal polyps. It may be particularly useful for patients with “incomplete” colonoscopy, those with contraindications for conventional colonoscopy, and those unwilling to undergo colonoscopy because of its perceived inconvenience and discomfort.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.050
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733634270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510709027047</els_id><sourcerecordid>733634270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqD_Aiucieeqykv6YRhGXRVVjwoN6EUJ2uXjNmOm2qe6H_vemdUcGDp3zwvKnUU0K8ULBVoKrX--2do60GaNJ5CyU8EhsFTZ1Vdd08FhtIUFYqqM_EOfMeAHY6V0_FmYa8ygutNuLblTzQhBkO6Bd2LOke_YyTG-7k9J0kWjtHtIsMvbTBh0FaHHn2JGnoAtswLtINsqOJ7EPoCI3BLyM_E0969EzPT-uF-Pr-3ZfrD9ntp5uP11e3mS12MGUdVk2_2-leFbpobLVryrpDVaiScqQWlS1z7AEh7doWVE5tUYHVuuqxpw7yC3F5fHeM4edMPJmDY0ve40BhZlPnD-3WK6mOpI2BOVJvxugOGBejwKxOzd4kp2Z1ul4lpynz8vT63B6o-5P4LTEBr04AskXfRxys47-cTlhT1Il7c-Qoubh3FA1bR4OlzsVkz3TB_fcbb_9JW-8Glwr-oIV4H-aYZshGGdYGzOd1-OvsoYHUeSr_Cx_DqbU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733634270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD ; Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD ; Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD ; Ladas, Spiros D., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD ; Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD ; Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD ; Ladas, Spiros D., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a new, noninvasive method for examining the entire colon. The reported yield of CCE in detecting colorectal polyps has shown variable results. Objective To assess the accuracy of CCE by pooling data of existing trials. Design Meta-analysis. The fixed-effects or random-effects model was used as appropriate, based on whether homogeneity or heterogeneity, respectively, was indicated by the Cochran Q test. Setting Studies that estimated the accuracy of CCE were identified. Two investigators independently conducted the search and data extraction. Patients A total of 626 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Intervention Each patient underwent CCE and conventional colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements Per-patient sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Findings were categorized as “significant polyps,” that is, a report of a polyp &gt;6 mm in size or 3 or more polyps of any size, or “any polyp,” that is, a report of any polyp found, independent of size. Pooled data on sensitivity and specificity with a 95% CI were estimated. For any polyp found, the pooled data showed per-patient CCE sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 68%-77%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%). For significant polyps, the respective values were 69% (95% CI, 62%-75%) and 86% (95% CI, 82%-90%). Limitations A small number of studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusion CCE is a reasonable method for screening asymptomatic individuals for colorectal polyps. It may be particularly useful for patients with “incomplete” colonoscopy, those with contraindications for conventional colonoscopy, and those unwilling to undergo colonoscopy because of its perceived inconvenience and discomfort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20363421</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maryland heights, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Capsule Endoscopy - standards ; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-04, Vol.71 (4), p.792-798</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010. Published by Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22634947$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20363421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladas, Spiros D., MD</creatorcontrib><title>A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a new, noninvasive method for examining the entire colon. The reported yield of CCE in detecting colorectal polyps has shown variable results. Objective To assess the accuracy of CCE by pooling data of existing trials. Design Meta-analysis. The fixed-effects or random-effects model was used as appropriate, based on whether homogeneity or heterogeneity, respectively, was indicated by the Cochran Q test. Setting Studies that estimated the accuracy of CCE were identified. Two investigators independently conducted the search and data extraction. Patients A total of 626 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Intervention Each patient underwent CCE and conventional colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements Per-patient sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Findings were categorized as “significant polyps,” that is, a report of a polyp &gt;6 mm in size or 3 or more polyps of any size, or “any polyp,” that is, a report of any polyp found, independent of size. Pooled data on sensitivity and specificity with a 95% CI were estimated. For any polyp found, the pooled data showed per-patient CCE sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 68%-77%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%). For significant polyps, the respective values were 69% (95% CI, 62%-75%) and 86% (95% CI, 82%-90%). Limitations A small number of studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusion CCE is a reasonable method for screening asymptomatic individuals for colorectal polyps. It may be particularly useful for patients with “incomplete” colonoscopy, those with contraindications for conventional colonoscopy, and those unwilling to undergo colonoscopy because of its perceived inconvenience and discomfort.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqD_Aiucieeqykv6YRhGXRVVjwoN6EUJ2uXjNmOm2qe6H_vemdUcGDp3zwvKnUU0K8ULBVoKrX--2do60GaNJ5CyU8EhsFTZ1Vdd08FhtIUFYqqM_EOfMeAHY6V0_FmYa8ygutNuLblTzQhBkO6Bd2LOke_YyTG-7k9J0kWjtHtIsMvbTBh0FaHHn2JGnoAtswLtINsqOJ7EPoCI3BLyM_E0969EzPT-uF-Pr-3ZfrD9ntp5uP11e3mS12MGUdVk2_2-leFbpobLVryrpDVaiScqQWlS1z7AEh7doWVE5tUYHVuuqxpw7yC3F5fHeM4edMPJmDY0ve40BhZlPnD-3WK6mOpI2BOVJvxugOGBejwKxOzd4kp2Z1ul4lpynz8vT63B6o-5P4LTEBr04AskXfRxys47-cTlhT1Il7c-Qoubh3FA1bR4OlzsVkz3TB_fcbb_9JW-8Glwr-oIV4H-aYZshGGdYGzOd1-OvsoYHUeSr_Cx_DqbU</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD</creator><creator>Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD</creator><creator>Ladas, Spiros D., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps</title><author>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD ; Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD ; Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD ; Ladas, Spiros D., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladas, Spiros D., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rokkas, Theodore, MD, PhD</au><au>Papaxoinis, Konstantinos, MD</au><au>Triantafyllou, Konstantinos, MD</au><au>Ladas, Spiros D., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>792</spage><epage>798</epage><pages>792-798</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a new, noninvasive method for examining the entire colon. The reported yield of CCE in detecting colorectal polyps has shown variable results. Objective To assess the accuracy of CCE by pooling data of existing trials. Design Meta-analysis. The fixed-effects or random-effects model was used as appropriate, based on whether homogeneity or heterogeneity, respectively, was indicated by the Cochran Q test. Setting Studies that estimated the accuracy of CCE were identified. Two investigators independently conducted the search and data extraction. Patients A total of 626 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Intervention Each patient underwent CCE and conventional colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements Per-patient sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Findings were categorized as “significant polyps,” that is, a report of a polyp &gt;6 mm in size or 3 or more polyps of any size, or “any polyp,” that is, a report of any polyp found, independent of size. Pooled data on sensitivity and specificity with a 95% CI were estimated. For any polyp found, the pooled data showed per-patient CCE sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 68%-77%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%). For significant polyps, the respective values were 69% (95% CI, 62%-75%) and 86% (95% CI, 82%-90%). Limitations A small number of studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusion CCE is a reasonable method for screening asymptomatic individuals for colorectal polyps. It may be particularly useful for patients with “incomplete” colonoscopy, those with contraindications for conventional colonoscopy, and those unwilling to undergo colonoscopy because of its perceived inconvenience and discomfort.</abstract><cop>Maryland heights, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>20363421</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.050</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-04, Vol.71 (4), p.792-798
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733634270
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Capsule Endoscopy - standards
Colonic Polyps - diagnosis
Digestive system. Abdomen
Endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Sensitivity and Specificity
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Tumors
title A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A55%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20meta-analysis%20evaluating%20the%20accuracy%20of%20colon%20capsule%20endoscopy%20in%20detecting%20colon%20polyps&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Rokkas,%20Theodore,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=792&rft.epage=798&rft.pages=792-798&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733634270%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-da69f882f14249c68957da1415e3aeba1c53af0a0a1cbb013eb460c226fafed03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733634270&rft_id=info:pmid/20363421&rfr_iscdi=true