Accuracy of sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: A systematic review

• Published in: European journal of cancer (1990) 2009-12, Vol.45 (18), p.3124-3130
• Main Authors: van Deurzen, Carolien H.M, Vriens, Birgit E.P.J, Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C.G, van der Wall, Elsken, Albregts, Mirjam, van Hilligersberg, Richard, Monninkhof, Evelyn M, van Diest, Paul J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use; Axilla; Biological and medical sciences; Breast - pathology; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; Breast Neoplasms - surgery; Databases, Factual; Female; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes - pathology; Medical sciences; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; Review; Sentinel lymph node biopsy; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - standards; Time Factors; Tumors
• ISSN: 0959-8049; 1879-0852
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.08.001

Abstract Background As neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used to downstage patients with breast cancer, the timing of the sentinel node (SN) biopsy has become an important issue. This review was conducted to determine the accuracy of SN biopsy following NAC. Methods We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases from 1993 to February 2009 for studies on patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent SN biopsy after NAC followed by an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Results Of 574 eligible studies, 27 were included in this review with a total study population of 2148 patients. The pooled SN identification rate was 90.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 88.0–93.1%) and the false-negative rate was 10.5% (95% CI = 8.1–13.6%). Negative predictive value and accuracy after NAC were 89.0% (95% CI = 85.1–92.1%) and 94.4% (95% CI = 92.6–95.8%), respectively. The reported SN success rates were heterogeneous and several variables were reported to be associated with decreased SN accuracy, i.e. initially positive clinical nodal status. Conclusions There is a potential role for SN biopsy following NAC which could be considered on an individual basis. However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend this as a standard procedure. Further research with subgroup analysis using variables reported to be associated with decreased SN accuracy is required in order to clearly define its value in the subgroups of breast cancer patients.