Loading…

Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode

A study of the electrochemical behavior of acrolein at a dropping mercury electrode using different polarographic techniques is described. Theoretical studies of the reversibility of the wave of acrolein were carried out using two different polarographic techniques: direct current tast and different...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Talanta (Oxford) 1996-07, Vol.43 (7), p.1117-1124
Main Authors: Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio, Muñoz Leyva, Juan A., Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-5b717b929c37988d475866b4f2f85b2d5d49ce0cd0c91e5a3bbc36c33601e6e83
cites
container_end_page 1124
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1117
container_title Talanta (Oxford)
container_volume 43
creator Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio
Muñoz Leyva, Juan A.
Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.
description A study of the electrochemical behavior of acrolein at a dropping mercury electrode using different polarographic techniques is described. Theoretical studies of the reversibility of the wave of acrolein were carried out using two different polarographic techniques: direct current tast and differential pulse. Differential pulse polarography may be used to determine acrolein concentration in a Britton-Robinson buffer solution of pH 10 in the ranges 2 × 10 −710 −8 and 5 × 10 −8–10 −4 mol dm −3 and a coefficient of variation of 1.7% for a concentration of 10 −5mol dm −3. A flow injection method with amperometric detection at a potential of −1.4V using a mercury electrode is also described. Before each injection, any drop hanging from the tip of the capillary needs to be dislodged and a new electrode drop dispensed; three different drop sizes were tested. A linear relationship between peak intensity and acrolein concentration was obtained in the range 10 −5-10 −7 mol dm −3, with a detection limit of 9.8 × 10 −8 mol dm − 3 and a coefficient of variation of 2.9% for a 2 × 10 −7 mol dm −3 concentration. Several organic and inorganic species were tested in order to ascertain whether they interfered with the signal for acrolein. The proposed methods were applied to the determination of acrolein in seawater samples.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0039-9140(96)01873-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733826419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0039914096018735</els_id><sourcerecordid>733826419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-5b717b929c37988d475866b4f2f85b2d5d49ce0cd0c91e5a3bbc36c33601e6e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFPHCEUx0nTpq5rv0HTcGhSPYyFYWDgYtKYqk1M9FDPhIE3FTMzbIHRbD-9jLuxN0_A4_f-D34IfabklBIqvhPCVKVoQ46VOCFUtqzi79DqZcN4y96j1StygA5TeiCE1Iywj-iASiUEl3KF_t2GwcTwJ5rNvbc45dltceixsTEM4CdsJod9TthBhjj6yWQfJtxtcT-EJ-ynB7AvlSef77EZNxDDCDmWrKVjd2cyNniEaOe4xTCUagwOjtCH3gwJPu3XNbq7-Pn7_Kq6vrn8df7jurJMylzxrqVtp2plWaukdE3LpRBd09e95F3tuGuUBWIdsYoCN6zrLBOWMUEoCJBsjb7tcjcx_J0hZT36ZGEYzARhTrplTNaioaqQzY4sn08pQq830Y8mbjUlepGuF6N6MapVOSyuNS9tX_YD5m4E979pb7kAX_eASdYMfTST9emVY7RpREleo7MdBsXGo4eok_UwWXA-FmfaBf_2Q54BJY-fxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733826419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio ; Muñoz Leyva, Juan A. ; Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio ; Muñoz Leyva, Juan A. ; Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</creatorcontrib><description>A study of the electrochemical behavior of acrolein at a dropping mercury electrode using different polarographic techniques is described. Theoretical studies of the reversibility of the wave of acrolein were carried out using two different polarographic techniques: direct current tast and differential pulse. Differential pulse polarography may be used to determine acrolein concentration in a Britton-Robinson buffer solution of pH 10 in the ranges 2 × 10 −710 −8 and 5 × 10 −8–10 −4 mol dm −3 and a coefficient of variation of 1.7% for a concentration of 10 −5mol dm −3. A flow injection method with amperometric detection at a potential of −1.4V using a mercury electrode is also described. Before each injection, any drop hanging from the tip of the capillary needs to be dislodged and a new electrode drop dispensed; three different drop sizes were tested. A linear relationship between peak intensity and acrolein concentration was obtained in the range 10 −5-10 −7 mol dm −3, with a detection limit of 9.8 × 10 −8 mol dm − 3 and a coefficient of variation of 2.9% for a 2 × 10 −7 mol dm −3 concentration. Several organic and inorganic species were tested in order to ascertain whether they interfered with the signal for acrolein. The proposed methods were applied to the determination of acrolein in seawater samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-9140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0039-9140(96)01873-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18966588</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TLNTA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acrolein determination ; Analytical chemistry ; Chemistry ; Electrochemical methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flow injection ; Polarography</subject><ispartof>Talanta (Oxford), 1996-07, Vol.43 (7), p.1117-1124</ispartof><rights>1996 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-5b717b929c37988d475866b4f2f85b2d5d49ce0cd0c91e5a3bbc36c33601e6e83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3144600$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18966588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz Leyva, Juan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</creatorcontrib><title>Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode</title><title>Talanta (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><description>A study of the electrochemical behavior of acrolein at a dropping mercury electrode using different polarographic techniques is described. Theoretical studies of the reversibility of the wave of acrolein were carried out using two different polarographic techniques: direct current tast and differential pulse. Differential pulse polarography may be used to determine acrolein concentration in a Britton-Robinson buffer solution of pH 10 in the ranges 2 × 10 −710 −8 and 5 × 10 −8–10 −4 mol dm −3 and a coefficient of variation of 1.7% for a concentration of 10 −5mol dm −3. A flow injection method with amperometric detection at a potential of −1.4V using a mercury electrode is also described. Before each injection, any drop hanging from the tip of the capillary needs to be dislodged and a new electrode drop dispensed; three different drop sizes were tested. A linear relationship between peak intensity and acrolein concentration was obtained in the range 10 −5-10 −7 mol dm −3, with a detection limit of 9.8 × 10 −8 mol dm − 3 and a coefficient of variation of 2.9% for a 2 × 10 −7 mol dm −3 concentration. Several organic and inorganic species were tested in order to ascertain whether they interfered with the signal for acrolein. The proposed methods were applied to the determination of acrolein in seawater samples.</description><subject>Acrolein determination</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Electrochemical methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flow injection</subject><subject>Polarography</subject><issn>0039-9140</issn><issn>1873-3573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFPHCEUx0nTpq5rv0HTcGhSPYyFYWDgYtKYqk1M9FDPhIE3FTMzbIHRbD-9jLuxN0_A4_f-D34IfabklBIqvhPCVKVoQ46VOCFUtqzi79DqZcN4y96j1StygA5TeiCE1Iywj-iASiUEl3KF_t2GwcTwJ5rNvbc45dltceixsTEM4CdsJod9TthBhjj6yWQfJtxtcT-EJ-ynB7AvlSef77EZNxDDCDmWrKVjd2cyNniEaOe4xTCUagwOjtCH3gwJPu3XNbq7-Pn7_Kq6vrn8df7jurJMylzxrqVtp2plWaukdE3LpRBd09e95F3tuGuUBWIdsYoCN6zrLBOWMUEoCJBsjb7tcjcx_J0hZT36ZGEYzARhTrplTNaioaqQzY4sn08pQq830Y8mbjUlepGuF6N6MapVOSyuNS9tX_YD5m4E979pb7kAX_eASdYMfTST9emVY7RpREleo7MdBsXGo4eok_UwWXA-FmfaBf_2Q54BJY-fxw</recordid><startdate>19960701</startdate><enddate>19960701</enddate><creator>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio</creator><creator>Muñoz Leyva, Juan A.</creator><creator>Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960701</creationdate><title>Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode</title><author>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio ; Muñoz Leyva, Juan A. ; Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-5b717b929c37988d475866b4f2f85b2d5d49ce0cd0c91e5a3bbc36c33601e6e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Acrolein determination</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Electrochemical methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flow injection</topic><topic>Polarography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz Leyva, Juan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio</au><au>Muñoz Leyva, Juan A.</au><au>Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode</atitle><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><date>1996-07-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1117</spage><epage>1124</epage><pages>1117-1124</pages><issn>0039-9140</issn><eissn>1873-3573</eissn><coden>TLNTA2</coden><abstract>A study of the electrochemical behavior of acrolein at a dropping mercury electrode using different polarographic techniques is described. Theoretical studies of the reversibility of the wave of acrolein were carried out using two different polarographic techniques: direct current tast and differential pulse. Differential pulse polarography may be used to determine acrolein concentration in a Britton-Robinson buffer solution of pH 10 in the ranges 2 × 10 −710 −8 and 5 × 10 −8–10 −4 mol dm −3 and a coefficient of variation of 1.7% for a concentration of 10 −5mol dm −3. A flow injection method with amperometric detection at a potential of −1.4V using a mercury electrode is also described. Before each injection, any drop hanging from the tip of the capillary needs to be dislodged and a new electrode drop dispensed; three different drop sizes were tested. A linear relationship between peak intensity and acrolein concentration was obtained in the range 10 −5-10 −7 mol dm −3, with a detection limit of 9.8 × 10 −8 mol dm − 3 and a coefficient of variation of 2.9% for a 2 × 10 −7 mol dm −3 concentration. Several organic and inorganic species were tested in order to ascertain whether they interfered with the signal for acrolein. The proposed methods were applied to the determination of acrolein in seawater samples.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>18966588</pmid><doi>10.1016/0039-9140(96)01873-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-9140
ispartof Talanta (Oxford), 1996-07, Vol.43 (7), p.1117-1124
issn 0039-9140
1873-3573
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733826419
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Acrolein determination
Analytical chemistry
Chemistry
Electrochemical methods
Exact sciences and technology
Flow injection
Polarography
title Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A40%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Polarographic%20study%20of%20acrolein%20and%20its%20determination%20by%20flow%20injection%20with%20amperometric%20detection%20at%20a%20mercury%20electrode&rft.jtitle=Talanta%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Naranjo%20Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Ignacio&rft.date=1996-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1117&rft.epage=1124&rft.pages=1117-1124&rft.issn=0039-9140&rft.eissn=1873-3573&rft.coden=TLNTA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0039-9140(96)01873-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733826419%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-5b717b929c37988d475866b4f2f85b2d5d49ce0cd0c91e5a3bbc36c33601e6e83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733826419&rft_id=info:pmid/18966588&rfr_iscdi=true