Loading…
Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode
A study of the electrochemical behavior of acrolein at a dropping mercury electrode using different polarographic techniques is described. Theoretical studies of the reversibility of the wave of acrolein were carried out using two different polarographic techniques: direct current tast and different...
Saved in:
Published in: | Talanta (Oxford) 1996-07, Vol.43 (7), p.1117-1124 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-5b717b929c37988d475866b4f2f85b2d5d49ce0cd0c91e5a3bbc36c33601e6e83 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1124 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1117 |
container_title | Talanta (Oxford) |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio Muñoz Leyva, Juan A. Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L. |
description | A study of the electrochemical behavior of acrolein at a dropping mercury electrode using different polarographic techniques is described. Theoretical studies of the reversibility of the wave of acrolein were carried out using two different polarographic techniques: direct current tast and differential pulse. Differential pulse polarography may be used to determine acrolein concentration in a Britton-Robinson buffer solution of pH 10 in the ranges 2 × 10
−710
−8 and 5 × 10
−8–10
−4 mol dm
−3 and a coefficient of variation of 1.7% for a concentration of 10
−5mol dm
−3. A flow injection method with amperometric detection at a potential of −1.4V using a mercury electrode is also described. Before each injection, any drop hanging from the tip of the capillary needs to be dislodged and a new electrode drop dispensed; three different drop sizes were tested. A linear relationship between peak intensity and acrolein concentration was obtained in the range 10
−5-10
−7 mol dm
−3, with a detection limit of 9.8 × 10
−8 mol dm
− 3 and a coefficient of variation of 2.9% for a 2 × 10
−7 mol dm
−3 concentration. Several organic and inorganic species were tested in order to ascertain whether they interfered with the signal for acrolein. The proposed methods were applied to the determination of acrolein in seawater samples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0039-9140(96)01873-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733826419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0039914096018735</els_id><sourcerecordid>733826419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-5b717b929c37988d475866b4f2f85b2d5d49ce0cd0c91e5a3bbc36c33601e6e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFPHCEUx0nTpq5rv0HTcGhSPYyFYWDgYtKYqk1M9FDPhIE3FTMzbIHRbD-9jLuxN0_A4_f-D34IfabklBIqvhPCVKVoQ46VOCFUtqzi79DqZcN4y96j1StygA5TeiCE1Iywj-iASiUEl3KF_t2GwcTwJ5rNvbc45dltceixsTEM4CdsJod9TthBhjj6yWQfJtxtcT-EJ-ynB7AvlSef77EZNxDDCDmWrKVjd2cyNniEaOe4xTCUagwOjtCH3gwJPu3XNbq7-Pn7_Kq6vrn8df7jurJMylzxrqVtp2plWaukdE3LpRBd09e95F3tuGuUBWIdsYoCN6zrLBOWMUEoCJBsjb7tcjcx_J0hZT36ZGEYzARhTrplTNaioaqQzY4sn08pQq830Y8mbjUlepGuF6N6MapVOSyuNS9tX_YD5m4E979pb7kAX_eASdYMfTST9emVY7RpREleo7MdBsXGo4eok_UwWXA-FmfaBf_2Q54BJY-fxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733826419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio ; Muñoz Leyva, Juan A. ; Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio ; Muñoz Leyva, Juan A. ; Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</creatorcontrib><description>A study of the electrochemical behavior of acrolein at a dropping mercury electrode using different polarographic techniques is described. Theoretical studies of the reversibility of the wave of acrolein were carried out using two different polarographic techniques: direct current tast and differential pulse. Differential pulse polarography may be used to determine acrolein concentration in a Britton-Robinson buffer solution of pH 10 in the ranges 2 × 10
−710
−8 and 5 × 10
−8–10
−4 mol dm
−3 and a coefficient of variation of 1.7% for a concentration of 10
−5mol dm
−3. A flow injection method with amperometric detection at a potential of −1.4V using a mercury electrode is also described. Before each injection, any drop hanging from the tip of the capillary needs to be dislodged and a new electrode drop dispensed; three different drop sizes were tested. A linear relationship between peak intensity and acrolein concentration was obtained in the range 10
−5-10
−7 mol dm
−3, with a detection limit of 9.8 × 10
−8 mol dm
− 3 and a coefficient of variation of 2.9% for a 2 × 10
−7 mol dm
−3 concentration. Several organic and inorganic species were tested in order to ascertain whether they interfered with the signal for acrolein. The proposed methods were applied to the determination of acrolein in seawater samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-9140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0039-9140(96)01873-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18966588</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TLNTA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acrolein determination ; Analytical chemistry ; Chemistry ; Electrochemical methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flow injection ; Polarography</subject><ispartof>Talanta (Oxford), 1996-07, Vol.43 (7), p.1117-1124</ispartof><rights>1996 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-5b717b929c37988d475866b4f2f85b2d5d49ce0cd0c91e5a3bbc36c33601e6e83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3144600$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18966588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz Leyva, Juan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</creatorcontrib><title>Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode</title><title>Talanta (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><description>A study of the electrochemical behavior of acrolein at a dropping mercury electrode using different polarographic techniques is described. Theoretical studies of the reversibility of the wave of acrolein were carried out using two different polarographic techniques: direct current tast and differential pulse. Differential pulse polarography may be used to determine acrolein concentration in a Britton-Robinson buffer solution of pH 10 in the ranges 2 × 10
−710
−8 and 5 × 10
−8–10
−4 mol dm
−3 and a coefficient of variation of 1.7% for a concentration of 10
−5mol dm
−3. A flow injection method with amperometric detection at a potential of −1.4V using a mercury electrode is also described. Before each injection, any drop hanging from the tip of the capillary needs to be dislodged and a new electrode drop dispensed; three different drop sizes were tested. A linear relationship between peak intensity and acrolein concentration was obtained in the range 10
−5-10
−7 mol dm
−3, with a detection limit of 9.8 × 10
−8 mol dm
− 3 and a coefficient of variation of 2.9% for a 2 × 10
−7 mol dm
−3 concentration. Several organic and inorganic species were tested in order to ascertain whether they interfered with the signal for acrolein. The proposed methods were applied to the determination of acrolein in seawater samples.</description><subject>Acrolein determination</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Electrochemical methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flow injection</subject><subject>Polarography</subject><issn>0039-9140</issn><issn>1873-3573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFPHCEUx0nTpq5rv0HTcGhSPYyFYWDgYtKYqk1M9FDPhIE3FTMzbIHRbD-9jLuxN0_A4_f-D34IfabklBIqvhPCVKVoQ46VOCFUtqzi79DqZcN4y96j1StygA5TeiCE1Iywj-iASiUEl3KF_t2GwcTwJ5rNvbc45dltceixsTEM4CdsJod9TthBhjj6yWQfJtxtcT-EJ-ynB7AvlSef77EZNxDDCDmWrKVjd2cyNniEaOe4xTCUagwOjtCH3gwJPu3XNbq7-Pn7_Kq6vrn8df7jurJMylzxrqVtp2plWaukdE3LpRBd09e95F3tuGuUBWIdsYoCN6zrLBOWMUEoCJBsjb7tcjcx_J0hZT36ZGEYzARhTrplTNaioaqQzY4sn08pQq830Y8mbjUlepGuF6N6MapVOSyuNS9tX_YD5m4E979pb7kAX_eASdYMfTST9emVY7RpREleo7MdBsXGo4eok_UwWXA-FmfaBf_2Q54BJY-fxw</recordid><startdate>19960701</startdate><enddate>19960701</enddate><creator>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio</creator><creator>Muñoz Leyva, Juan A.</creator><creator>Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960701</creationdate><title>Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode</title><author>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio ; Muñoz Leyva, Juan A. ; Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-5b717b929c37988d475866b4f2f85b2d5d49ce0cd0c91e5a3bbc36c33601e6e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Acrolein determination</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Electrochemical methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flow injection</topic><topic>Polarography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz Leyva, Juan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naranjo Rodríguez, Ignacio</au><au>Muñoz Leyva, Juan A.</au><au>Hidalgo Hidalgo de Cisneros, José L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode</atitle><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><date>1996-07-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1117</spage><epage>1124</epage><pages>1117-1124</pages><issn>0039-9140</issn><eissn>1873-3573</eissn><coden>TLNTA2</coden><abstract>A study of the electrochemical behavior of acrolein at a dropping mercury electrode using different polarographic techniques is described. Theoretical studies of the reversibility of the wave of acrolein were carried out using two different polarographic techniques: direct current tast and differential pulse. Differential pulse polarography may be used to determine acrolein concentration in a Britton-Robinson buffer solution of pH 10 in the ranges 2 × 10
−710
−8 and 5 × 10
−8–10
−4 mol dm
−3 and a coefficient of variation of 1.7% for a concentration of 10
−5mol dm
−3. A flow injection method with amperometric detection at a potential of −1.4V using a mercury electrode is also described. Before each injection, any drop hanging from the tip of the capillary needs to be dislodged and a new electrode drop dispensed; three different drop sizes were tested. A linear relationship between peak intensity and acrolein concentration was obtained in the range 10
−5-10
−7 mol dm
−3, with a detection limit of 9.8 × 10
−8 mol dm
− 3 and a coefficient of variation of 2.9% for a 2 × 10
−7 mol dm
−3 concentration. Several organic and inorganic species were tested in order to ascertain whether they interfered with the signal for acrolein. The proposed methods were applied to the determination of acrolein in seawater samples.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>18966588</pmid><doi>10.1016/0039-9140(96)01873-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-9140 |
ispartof | Talanta (Oxford), 1996-07, Vol.43 (7), p.1117-1124 |
issn | 0039-9140 1873-3573 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733826419 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Acrolein determination Analytical chemistry Chemistry Electrochemical methods Exact sciences and technology Flow injection Polarography |
title | Polarographic study of acrolein and its determination by flow injection with amperometric detection at a mercury electrode |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A40%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Polarographic%20study%20of%20acrolein%20and%20its%20determination%20by%20flow%20injection%20with%20amperometric%20detection%20at%20a%20mercury%20electrode&rft.jtitle=Talanta%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Naranjo%20Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Ignacio&rft.date=1996-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1117&rft.epage=1124&rft.pages=1117-1124&rft.issn=0039-9140&rft.eissn=1873-3573&rft.coden=TLNTA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0039-9140(96)01873-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733826419%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-5b717b929c37988d475866b4f2f85b2d5d49ce0cd0c91e5a3bbc36c33601e6e83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733826419&rft_id=info:pmid/18966588&rfr_iscdi=true |