Loading…
Adolescent Preferences for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Methods and Impact of Rapid Tests on Receipt of Results
Abstract Purpose Rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests may be more acceptable to adolescents and may improve receipt of test results. We conducted a study to determine (a) adolescent preferences for different HIV testing methods (rapid oral fluid vs. rapid fingerstick vs. traditional venipu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of adolescent health 2010-02, Vol.46 (2), p.162-168 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-10d2f4e4771b2f1f498fb439f5b17022fa931991a8afd6443ff5cff421af254b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-10d2f4e4771b2f1f498fb439f5b17022fa931991a8afd6443ff5cff421af254b3 |
container_end_page | 168 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 162 |
container_title | Journal of adolescent health |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Kowalczyk Mullins, Tanya L., M.D., M.S Braverman, Paula K., M.D Dorn, Lorah D., Ph.D Kollar, Linda M., M.S.N Kahn, Jessica A., M.D., M.P.H |
description | Abstract Purpose Rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests may be more acceptable to adolescents and may improve receipt of test results. We conducted a study to determine (a) adolescent preferences for different HIV testing methods (rapid oral fluid vs. rapid fingerstick vs. traditional venipuncture), (b) factors associated with choice of a rapid vs. traditional test, and (c) whether those who chose a rapid method were more likely to receive test results. Methods Participants (N = 99, 13–22 years old, both genders) were recruited from an urban hospital-based adolescent primary care clinic, agreed to HIV testing with their choice of method, and completed a questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics and attitudes about HIV testing. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with choice of a rapid versus traditional test. Results Half (50.5%) of participants chose rapid oral fluid testing, 30.3% traditional venipuncture testing, and 19.2% rapid fingerstick testing ( p < .01). Factors independently associated with choice of a rapid versus traditional method included preference for an oral fluid versus blood test and perceived approval of HIV testing by one's healthcare provider. Participants who chose a rapid test were more likely to receive their test results within the follow-up period than participants who chose a traditional test (91.3% vs. 46.7%, p < .001). Conclusions In this study, 70% of adolescents preferred rapid to traditional HIV testing, and rapid testers were more likely to receive their results within the follow-up period. Offering rapid testing may lead to improved receipt of results among adolescents in urban primary care settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.06.015 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733892955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1054139X09002390</els_id><sourcerecordid>57330557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-10d2f4e4771b2f1f498fb439f5b17022fa931991a8afd6443ff5cff421af254b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEou3CX0C-AKeEsfPpC1JbUVqpCFQK4mY59pj1ktjBTkD77_F2FypxQFxsa-aZD887WUYoFBRo82pTbKT2a5TDvC4YAC-gKYDWD7Jj2rU8p7xlD9Mb6iqnJf9ylJ3EuIEU2lB4nB0xoMnM2HH281T7AaNCN5MPAQ0GdAojMT6Qy2WUjlyN4-K8RmOVTb4t-WzDEsktxtm6r-QdzmuvI5FOJ3SSaibekBs5WX3HROIduUGFdtp7MC7DHJ9kj4wcIj493Kvs08Wb2_PL_Pr926vz0-tcVR2fcwqamQqrtqU9M9RUvDN9VXJT97QFxozkJeWcyk4a3VRVaUytjKkYlYbVVV-uspf7vFPw35fUjxht-u0wSId-iaIty44zXteJfPFPsk4o1OlcZd0eVMHHmGYmpmBHGbaCgtjJIzbiXh6xk0dAI5I8KfTZocbSj6j_BP7WIwHPD4CMSg4mSKdsvOdYyVtom8Sd7TlMs_thMYh4pw5qG1DNQnv7P928_iuJGqyzqe433GLc-CW4pI2gIjIB4uNunXbbBBwgNQLlLwsLyNo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57330557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adolescent Preferences for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Methods and Impact of Rapid Tests on Receipt of Results</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Kowalczyk Mullins, Tanya L., M.D., M.S ; Braverman, Paula K., M.D ; Dorn, Lorah D., Ph.D ; Kollar, Linda M., M.S.N ; Kahn, Jessica A., M.D., M.P.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Kowalczyk Mullins, Tanya L., M.D., M.S ; Braverman, Paula K., M.D ; Dorn, Lorah D., Ph.D ; Kollar, Linda M., M.S.N ; Kahn, Jessica A., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose Rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests may be more acceptable to adolescents and may improve receipt of test results. We conducted a study to determine (a) adolescent preferences for different HIV testing methods (rapid oral fluid vs. rapid fingerstick vs. traditional venipuncture), (b) factors associated with choice of a rapid vs. traditional test, and (c) whether those who chose a rapid method were more likely to receive test results. Methods Participants (N = 99, 13–22 years old, both genders) were recruited from an urban hospital-based adolescent primary care clinic, agreed to HIV testing with their choice of method, and completed a questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics and attitudes about HIV testing. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with choice of a rapid versus traditional test. Results Half (50.5%) of participants chose rapid oral fluid testing, 30.3% traditional venipuncture testing, and 19.2% rapid fingerstick testing ( p < .01). Factors independently associated with choice of a rapid versus traditional method included preference for an oral fluid versus blood test and perceived approval of HIV testing by one's healthcare provider. Participants who chose a rapid test were more likely to receive their test results within the follow-up period than participants who chose a traditional test (91.3% vs. 46.7%, p < .001). Conclusions In this study, 70% of adolescents preferred rapid to traditional HIV testing, and rapid testers were more likely to receive their results within the follow-up period. Offering rapid testing may lead to improved receipt of results among adolescents in urban primary care settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-139X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.06.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20113922</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAHCD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescent Behavior - psychology ; Adolescents ; AIDS serodiagnosis ; AIDS Serodiagnosis - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Cross-sectional studies ; Female ; Health knowledge, attitudes, and practice ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; HIV ; HIV Antibodies - analysis ; HIV Antibodies - blood ; HIV Infections - diagnosis ; HIV Infections - prevention & control ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Immunodeficiencies ; Immunodeficiencies. Immunoglobulinopathies ; Immunopathology ; Infectious diseases ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Pediatrics ; Point-of-care systems ; Preferences ; Prevention and actions ; Primary health care ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Questionnaires ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Saliva - virology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) ; Testing ; United States - epidemiology ; Urban Population - statistics & numerical data ; Venipuncture ; Viral diseases ; Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of adolescent health, 2010-02, Vol.46 (2), p.162-168</ispartof><rights>Society for Adolescent Medicine</rights><rights>2010 Society for Adolescent Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Society for Adolescent Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-10d2f4e4771b2f1f498fb439f5b17022fa931991a8afd6443ff5cff421af254b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-10d2f4e4771b2f1f498fb439f5b17022fa931991a8afd6443ff5cff421af254b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22397076$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20113922$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kowalczyk Mullins, Tanya L., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braverman, Paula K., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorn, Lorah D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kollar, Linda M., M.S.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Jessica A., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><title>Adolescent Preferences for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Methods and Impact of Rapid Tests on Receipt of Results</title><title>Journal of adolescent health</title><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose Rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests may be more acceptable to adolescents and may improve receipt of test results. We conducted a study to determine (a) adolescent preferences for different HIV testing methods (rapid oral fluid vs. rapid fingerstick vs. traditional venipuncture), (b) factors associated with choice of a rapid vs. traditional test, and (c) whether those who chose a rapid method were more likely to receive test results. Methods Participants (N = 99, 13–22 years old, both genders) were recruited from an urban hospital-based adolescent primary care clinic, agreed to HIV testing with their choice of method, and completed a questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics and attitudes about HIV testing. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with choice of a rapid versus traditional test. Results Half (50.5%) of participants chose rapid oral fluid testing, 30.3% traditional venipuncture testing, and 19.2% rapid fingerstick testing ( p < .01). Factors independently associated with choice of a rapid versus traditional method included preference for an oral fluid versus blood test and perceived approval of HIV testing by one's healthcare provider. Participants who chose a rapid test were more likely to receive their test results within the follow-up period than participants who chose a traditional test (91.3% vs. 46.7%, p < .001). Conclusions In this study, 70% of adolescents preferred rapid to traditional HIV testing, and rapid testers were more likely to receive their results within the follow-up period. Offering rapid testing may lead to improved receipt of results among adolescents in urban primary care settings.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescent Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>AIDS serodiagnosis</subject><subject>AIDS Serodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health knowledge, attitudes, and practice</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV Antibodies - analysis</subject><subject>HIV Antibodies - blood</subject><subject>HIV Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>HIV Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunodeficiencies</subject><subject>Immunodeficiencies. Immunoglobulinopathies</subject><subject>Immunopathology</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Point-of-care systems</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Saliva - virology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urban Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Venipuncture</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1054-139X</issn><issn>1879-1972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEou3CX0C-AKeEsfPpC1JbUVqpCFQK4mY59pj1ktjBTkD77_F2FypxQFxsa-aZD887WUYoFBRo82pTbKT2a5TDvC4YAC-gKYDWD7Jj2rU8p7xlD9Mb6iqnJf9ylJ3EuIEU2lB4nB0xoMnM2HH281T7AaNCN5MPAQ0GdAojMT6Qy2WUjlyN4-K8RmOVTb4t-WzDEsktxtm6r-QdzmuvI5FOJ3SSaibekBs5WX3HROIduUGFdtp7MC7DHJ9kj4wcIj493Kvs08Wb2_PL_Pr926vz0-tcVR2fcwqamQqrtqU9M9RUvDN9VXJT97QFxozkJeWcyk4a3VRVaUytjKkYlYbVVV-uspf7vFPw35fUjxht-u0wSId-iaIty44zXteJfPFPsk4o1OlcZd0eVMHHmGYmpmBHGbaCgtjJIzbiXh6xk0dAI5I8KfTZocbSj6j_BP7WIwHPD4CMSg4mSKdsvOdYyVtom8Sd7TlMs_thMYh4pw5qG1DNQnv7P928_iuJGqyzqe433GLc-CW4pI2gIjIB4uNunXbbBBwgNQLlLwsLyNo</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Kowalczyk Mullins, Tanya L., M.D., M.S</creator><creator>Braverman, Paula K., M.D</creator><creator>Dorn, Lorah D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Kollar, Linda M., M.S.N</creator><creator>Kahn, Jessica A., M.D., M.P.H</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Adolescent Preferences for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Methods and Impact of Rapid Tests on Receipt of Results</title><author>Kowalczyk Mullins, Tanya L., M.D., M.S ; Braverman, Paula K., M.D ; Dorn, Lorah D., Ph.D ; Kollar, Linda M., M.S.N ; Kahn, Jessica A., M.D., M.P.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-10d2f4e4771b2f1f498fb439f5b17022fa931991a8afd6443ff5cff421af254b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescent Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>AIDS serodiagnosis</topic><topic>AIDS Serodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health knowledge, attitudes, and practice</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV Antibodies - analysis</topic><topic>HIV Antibodies - blood</topic><topic>HIV Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>HIV Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunodeficiencies</topic><topic>Immunodeficiencies. Immunoglobulinopathies</topic><topic>Immunopathology</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Point-of-care systems</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Saliva - virology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urban Population - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Venipuncture</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kowalczyk Mullins, Tanya L., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braverman, Paula K., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorn, Lorah D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kollar, Linda M., M.S.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Jessica A., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kowalczyk Mullins, Tanya L., M.D., M.S</au><au>Braverman, Paula K., M.D</au><au>Dorn, Lorah D., Ph.D</au><au>Kollar, Linda M., M.S.N</au><au>Kahn, Jessica A., M.D., M.P.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adolescent Preferences for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Methods and Impact of Rapid Tests on Receipt of Results</atitle><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>162-168</pages><issn>1054-139X</issn><eissn>1879-1972</eissn><coden>JAHCD9</coden><abstract>Abstract Purpose Rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests may be more acceptable to adolescents and may improve receipt of test results. We conducted a study to determine (a) adolescent preferences for different HIV testing methods (rapid oral fluid vs. rapid fingerstick vs. traditional venipuncture), (b) factors associated with choice of a rapid vs. traditional test, and (c) whether those who chose a rapid method were more likely to receive test results. Methods Participants (N = 99, 13–22 years old, both genders) were recruited from an urban hospital-based adolescent primary care clinic, agreed to HIV testing with their choice of method, and completed a questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics and attitudes about HIV testing. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with choice of a rapid versus traditional test. Results Half (50.5%) of participants chose rapid oral fluid testing, 30.3% traditional venipuncture testing, and 19.2% rapid fingerstick testing ( p < .01). Factors independently associated with choice of a rapid versus traditional method included preference for an oral fluid versus blood test and perceived approval of HIV testing by one's healthcare provider. Participants who chose a rapid test were more likely to receive their test results within the follow-up period than participants who chose a traditional test (91.3% vs. 46.7%, p < .001). Conclusions In this study, 70% of adolescents preferred rapid to traditional HIV testing, and rapid testers were more likely to receive their results within the follow-up period. Offering rapid testing may lead to improved receipt of results among adolescents in urban primary care settings.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20113922</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.06.015</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1054-139X |
ispartof | Journal of adolescent health, 2010-02, Vol.46 (2), p.162-168 |
issn | 1054-139X 1879-1972 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733892955 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Adolescent Adolescent Behavior - psychology Adolescents AIDS serodiagnosis AIDS Serodiagnosis - methods Biological and medical sciences Choice Behavior Cross-sectional studies Female Health knowledge, attitudes, and practice Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice HIV HIV Antibodies - analysis HIV Antibodies - blood HIV Infections - diagnosis HIV Infections - prevention & control Human viral diseases Humans Immunodeficiencies Immunodeficiencies. Immunoglobulinopathies Immunopathology Infectious diseases Male Medical sciences Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Pediatrics Point-of-care systems Preferences Prevention and actions Primary health care Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Questionnaires Reagent Kits, Diagnostic Saliva - virology Sensitivity and Specificity Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) Testing United States - epidemiology Urban Population - statistics & numerical data Venipuncture Viral diseases Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids Young Adult |
title | Adolescent Preferences for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Methods and Impact of Rapid Tests on Receipt of Results |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T23%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adolescent%20Preferences%20for%20Human%20Immunodeficiency%20Virus%20Testing%20Methods%20and%20Impact%20of%20Rapid%20Tests%20on%20Receipt%20of%20Results&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20adolescent%20health&rft.au=Kowalczyk%20Mullins,%20Tanya%20L.,%20M.D.,%20M.S&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=162-168&rft.issn=1054-139X&rft.eissn=1879-1972&rft.coden=JAHCD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.06.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57330557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-10d2f4e4771b2f1f498fb439f5b17022fa931991a8afd6443ff5cff421af254b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57330557&rft_id=info:pmid/20113922&rfr_iscdi=true |