Loading…

Comparative analysis of leakage in root canal fillings performed with gutta-percha and Resilon cones with AH Plus and Epiphany sealers

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the leakage of root canal fillings of gutta-percha or Resilon cones in association with AH Plus or Epiphany sealer. Study design Four groups of premolars (n = 64) were instrumented to size 45/.04 ProFile and filled with laterally compacted gutta-percha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2010-02, Vol.109 (2), p.e131-e135
Main Authors: Hirai, Vinício Hidemitsu Goto, MS, da Silva Neto, Ulisses Xavier, DDS, PhD, Westphalen, Vânia Portela Ditzel, DDS, PhD, Perin, Camila Paiva, MS, Carneiro, Everdan, DDS, PhD, Fariniuk, Luiz Fernando, DDS, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective The aim of this study was to compare the leakage of root canal fillings of gutta-percha or Resilon cones in association with AH Plus or Epiphany sealer. Study design Four groups of premolars (n = 64) were instrumented to size 45/.04 ProFile and filled with laterally compacted gutta-percha cones or Resilon cones in association with AH Plus or Epiphany sealer. The specimens were stored for 2 weeks at 37°C and 100% humidity. After that, leakage was measured using the fluid filtration method and determined as μL/min · 10 psi. Results Homogeneity of variance and multiple comparisons tests were performed and indicated that root fillings with the combination of gutta-percha cones and AH Plus sealer showed lower leakage values ( P < .05) than the other groups. Conclusion Considering the experimental conditions and the results obtained, it was concluded that fillings made with gutta-percha cones in combination with AH Plus sealer had the best performance.
ISSN:1079-2104
1528-395X
DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.09.038