Loading…
Extended vs standard pelvic lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for intermediate‐ and high‐risk prostate cancer
Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of extended vs standard pelvic lymphadenectomy (sPLND) for patients with intermediate‐ and high‐risk prostate cancer undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Of a total of 1269...
Saved in:
Published in: | BJU international 2010-08, Vol.106 (4), p.537-542 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effect of extended vs standard pelvic lymphadenectomy (sPLND) for patients with intermediate‐ and high‐risk prostate cancer undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Of a total of 1269 patients who underwent LRP during a 109 month period, 374 (30%) had a PLND; 253 men had a sPLND (2000 to March 2008) and 121 had an extended PLND (ePLND; after April 2008) for intermediate‐ or high‐risk prostate cancer. An extraperitoneal approach was used in all patients having sPLND and a transperitoneal approach in patients having ePLND.
RESULTS
Patient age, body mass index, gland weight, prostate‐specific antigen level and Gleason grade were similar in the two groups. The ePLND group had a greater proportion of patients with cT3 disease (9.9% vs 4.2%, P = 0.046) and was associated with a longer operating time of 206.5 vs 180.0 min (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09161.x |