Loading…

Extended vs standard pelvic lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for intermediate‐ and high‐risk prostate cancer

Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of extended vs standard pelvic lymphadenectomy (sPLND) for patients with intermediate‐ and high‐risk prostate cancer undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Of a total of 1269...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJU international 2010-08, Vol.106 (4), p.537-542
Main Authors: Eden, Christopher G., Arora, Avanish, Rouse, Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of extended vs standard pelvic lymphadenectomy (sPLND) for patients with intermediate‐ and high‐risk prostate cancer undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Of a total of 1269 patients who underwent LRP during a 109 month period, 374 (30%) had a PLND; 253 men had a sPLND (2000 to March 2008) and 121 had an extended PLND (ePLND; after April 2008) for intermediate‐ or high‐risk prostate cancer. An extraperitoneal approach was used in all patients having sPLND and a transperitoneal approach in patients having ePLND. RESULTS Patient age, body mass index, gland weight, prostate‐specific antigen level and Gleason grade were similar in the two groups. The ePLND group had a greater proportion of patients with cT3 disease (9.9% vs 4.2%, P = 0.046) and was associated with a longer operating time of 206.5 vs 180.0 min (P 
ISSN:1464-4096
1464-410X
DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09161.x