Loading…
Midterm results of radiofrequency ablation versus nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma
Purpose The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate midterm results of renal radiofrequency (RF) ablation compared to the results after nephrectomy in patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and methods A total of 115 patients with a single RCC measuring ≤4 cm (T1a) were in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Japanese Journal of Radiology 2010-07, Vol.28 (6), p.460-468 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a087e818f209b4bf4d2b01350a18f511e79cff245084fb712c1bb38ead09ff573 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a087e818f209b4bf4d2b01350a18f511e79cff245084fb712c1bb38ead09ff573 |
container_end_page | 468 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 460 |
container_title | Japanese Journal of Radiology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Takaki, Haruyuki Yamakado, Koichiro Soga, Norihito Arima, Kiminobu Nakatsuka, Atsuhiro Kashima, Masataka Uraki, Junji Yamada, Tomomi Takeda, Kan Sugimura, Yoshiki |
description | Purpose
The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate midterm results of renal radiofrequency (RF) ablation compared to the results after nephrectomy in patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Materials and methods
A total of 115 patients with a single RCC measuring ≤4 cm (T1a) were included; 51 patients underwent RF ablation, 54 patients radical nephrectomy, and 10 patients partial nephrectomy. The survival and the percent decreases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were compared among the three treatments.
Results
Although overall survival after RF ablation (75.0% at 5 years) was lower than those after radical and partial nephrectomy, the RCC-related survival (100% at 5 years) was comparable to those following radical nephrectomy (100% at 5 years) and partial nephrectomy (100% at 3 years). The disease-free survival (DFS) after RF ablation (98.0% at 5 years) was also comparable to those after radical nephrectomy (95.0% at 5 years) (
P
= 0.72) and partial nephrectomy (75.0% at 3 years) (
P
= 0.13). The percent decrease in the GFR at last follow-up in the RF ablation group (median 7.9%) was significantly lower than that in the radical nephrectomy group (median 29.0%) (
P
< 0.001) and comparable to that in the partial nephrectomy group (median 11.5%) (
P
= 0.73).
Conclusion
RF ablation provides RCC-related and DFS comparable to that found after nephrectomy with little loss of renal function. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11604-010-0451-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734033299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734033299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a087e818f209b4bf4d2b01350a18f511e79cff245084fb712c1bb38ead09ff573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMozjj6AG4kuHFVvTdJm3Ypg3-guNGNm5C2iVbaZkxaYXx6M86oILjJDbnfOTkcQg4RThFAngXEDEQCCAmIFJOPLTLFPGNJyqTY_rrLBEHihOyF8AoguMizXTJhkGWYFXJKnu6aejC-o96EsR0CdZZ6XTfOevM2mr5aUl22emhcT9-ND2OgvVm8eFMNrltS6zx9QB3VvW5pZdp4aF81vev0Ptmxug3mYDNn5PHy4mF-ndzeX93Mz2-TSmQwJBpyaXLMLYOiFKUVNSsBeQo6vqWIRhaVtUykkAtbSmQVliXPja6hsDaVfEZO1r4L72LkMKiuCasoujduDEpyAZyzoojk8R_y1Y0-Jo-QAJYD4zxCuIYq70LwxqqFbzrtlwpBrWpX69pVrF2talcfUXO0MR7LztQ_iu-eI8DWQIir_tn435__d_0ERu-N-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>740280233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Midterm results of radiofrequency ablation versus nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Takaki, Haruyuki ; Yamakado, Koichiro ; Soga, Norihito ; Arima, Kiminobu ; Nakatsuka, Atsuhiro ; Kashima, Masataka ; Uraki, Junji ; Yamada, Tomomi ; Takeda, Kan ; Sugimura, Yoshiki</creator><creatorcontrib>Takaki, Haruyuki ; Yamakado, Koichiro ; Soga, Norihito ; Arima, Kiminobu ; Nakatsuka, Atsuhiro ; Kashima, Masataka ; Uraki, Junji ; Yamada, Tomomi ; Takeda, Kan ; Sugimura, Yoshiki</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate midterm results of renal radiofrequency (RF) ablation compared to the results after nephrectomy in patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Materials and methods
A total of 115 patients with a single RCC measuring ≤4 cm (T1a) were included; 51 patients underwent RF ablation, 54 patients radical nephrectomy, and 10 patients partial nephrectomy. The survival and the percent decreases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were compared among the three treatments.
Results
Although overall survival after RF ablation (75.0% at 5 years) was lower than those after radical and partial nephrectomy, the RCC-related survival (100% at 5 years) was comparable to those following radical nephrectomy (100% at 5 years) and partial nephrectomy (100% at 3 years). The disease-free survival (DFS) after RF ablation (98.0% at 5 years) was also comparable to those after radical nephrectomy (95.0% at 5 years) (
P
= 0.72) and partial nephrectomy (75.0% at 3 years) (
P
= 0.13). The percent decrease in the GFR at last follow-up in the RF ablation group (median 7.9%) was significantly lower than that in the radical nephrectomy group (median 29.0%) (
P
< 0.001) and comparable to that in the partial nephrectomy group (median 11.5%) (
P
= 0.73).
Conclusion
RF ablation provides RCC-related and DFS comparable to that found after nephrectomy with little loss of renal function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-1071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1862-5274</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-108X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0451-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20661697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery ; Catheter Ablation - methods ; Catheter Ablation - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Imaging ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy - methods ; Nephrectomy - statistics & numerical data ; Nuclear Medicine ; Original Article ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2010-07, Vol.28 (6), p.460-468</ispartof><rights>Japan Radiological Society 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a087e818f209b4bf4d2b01350a18f511e79cff245084fb712c1bb38ead09ff573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a087e818f209b4bf4d2b01350a18f511e79cff245084fb712c1bb38ead09ff573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20661697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takaki, Haruyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamakado, Koichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soga, Norihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arima, Kiminobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakatsuka, Atsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashima, Masataka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uraki, Junji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Tomomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeda, Kan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimura, Yoshiki</creatorcontrib><title>Midterm results of radiofrequency ablation versus nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma</title><title>Japanese Journal of Radiology</title><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose
The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate midterm results of renal radiofrequency (RF) ablation compared to the results after nephrectomy in patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Materials and methods
A total of 115 patients with a single RCC measuring ≤4 cm (T1a) were included; 51 patients underwent RF ablation, 54 patients radical nephrectomy, and 10 patients partial nephrectomy. The survival and the percent decreases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were compared among the three treatments.
Results
Although overall survival after RF ablation (75.0% at 5 years) was lower than those after radical and partial nephrectomy, the RCC-related survival (100% at 5 years) was comparable to those following radical nephrectomy (100% at 5 years) and partial nephrectomy (100% at 3 years). The disease-free survival (DFS) after RF ablation (98.0% at 5 years) was also comparable to those after radical nephrectomy (95.0% at 5 years) (
P
= 0.72) and partial nephrectomy (75.0% at 3 years) (
P
= 0.13). The percent decrease in the GFR at last follow-up in the RF ablation group (median 7.9%) was significantly lower than that in the radical nephrectomy group (median 29.0%) (
P
< 0.001) and comparable to that in the partial nephrectomy group (median 11.5%) (
P
= 0.73).
Conclusion
RF ablation provides RCC-related and DFS comparable to that found after nephrectomy with little loss of renal function.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - methods</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1867-1071</issn><issn>1862-5274</issn><issn>1867-108X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMozjj6AG4kuHFVvTdJm3Ypg3-guNGNm5C2iVbaZkxaYXx6M86oILjJDbnfOTkcQg4RThFAngXEDEQCCAmIFJOPLTLFPGNJyqTY_rrLBEHihOyF8AoguMizXTJhkGWYFXJKnu6aejC-o96EsR0CdZZ6XTfOevM2mr5aUl22emhcT9-ND2OgvVm8eFMNrltS6zx9QB3VvW5pZdp4aF81vev0Ptmxug3mYDNn5PHy4mF-ndzeX93Mz2-TSmQwJBpyaXLMLYOiFKUVNSsBeQo6vqWIRhaVtUykkAtbSmQVliXPja6hsDaVfEZO1r4L72LkMKiuCasoujduDEpyAZyzoojk8R_y1Y0-Jo-QAJYD4zxCuIYq70LwxqqFbzrtlwpBrWpX69pVrF2talcfUXO0MR7LztQ_iu-eI8DWQIir_tn435__d_0ERu-N-w</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Takaki, Haruyuki</creator><creator>Yamakado, Koichiro</creator><creator>Soga, Norihito</creator><creator>Arima, Kiminobu</creator><creator>Nakatsuka, Atsuhiro</creator><creator>Kashima, Masataka</creator><creator>Uraki, Junji</creator><creator>Yamada, Tomomi</creator><creator>Takeda, Kan</creator><creator>Sugimura, Yoshiki</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Midterm results of radiofrequency ablation versus nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma</title><author>Takaki, Haruyuki ; Yamakado, Koichiro ; Soga, Norihito ; Arima, Kiminobu ; Nakatsuka, Atsuhiro ; Kashima, Masataka ; Uraki, Junji ; Yamada, Tomomi ; Takeda, Kan ; Sugimura, Yoshiki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a087e818f209b4bf4d2b01350a18f511e79cff245084fb712c1bb38ead09ff573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - methods</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takaki, Haruyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamakado, Koichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soga, Norihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arima, Kiminobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakatsuka, Atsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashima, Masataka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uraki, Junji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Tomomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeda, Kan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimura, Yoshiki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Japanese Journal of Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takaki, Haruyuki</au><au>Yamakado, Koichiro</au><au>Soga, Norihito</au><au>Arima, Kiminobu</au><au>Nakatsuka, Atsuhiro</au><au>Kashima, Masataka</au><au>Uraki, Junji</au><au>Yamada, Tomomi</au><au>Takeda, Kan</au><au>Sugimura, Yoshiki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Midterm results of radiofrequency ablation versus nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Japanese Journal of Radiology</jtitle><stitle>Jpn J Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>468</epage><pages>460-468</pages><issn>1867-1071</issn><eissn>1862-5274</eissn><eissn>1867-108X</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate midterm results of renal radiofrequency (RF) ablation compared to the results after nephrectomy in patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Materials and methods
A total of 115 patients with a single RCC measuring ≤4 cm (T1a) were included; 51 patients underwent RF ablation, 54 patients radical nephrectomy, and 10 patients partial nephrectomy. The survival and the percent decreases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were compared among the three treatments.
Results
Although overall survival after RF ablation (75.0% at 5 years) was lower than those after radical and partial nephrectomy, the RCC-related survival (100% at 5 years) was comparable to those following radical nephrectomy (100% at 5 years) and partial nephrectomy (100% at 3 years). The disease-free survival (DFS) after RF ablation (98.0% at 5 years) was also comparable to those after radical nephrectomy (95.0% at 5 years) (
P
= 0.72) and partial nephrectomy (75.0% at 3 years) (
P
= 0.13). The percent decrease in the GFR at last follow-up in the RF ablation group (median 7.9%) was significantly lower than that in the radical nephrectomy group (median 29.0%) (
P
< 0.001) and comparable to that in the partial nephrectomy group (median 11.5%) (
P
= 0.73).
Conclusion
RF ablation provides RCC-related and DFS comparable to that found after nephrectomy with little loss of renal function.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>20661697</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11604-010-0451-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1867-1071 |
ispartof | Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2010-07, Vol.28 (6), p.460-468 |
issn | 1867-1071 1862-5274 1867-108X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734033299 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Aged Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery Catheter Ablation - methods Catheter Ablation - statistics & numerical data Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Imaging Kidney Neoplasms - surgery Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Nephrectomy - methods Nephrectomy - statistics & numerical data Nuclear Medicine Original Article Radiology Radiotherapy Retrospective Studies Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome |
title | Midterm results of radiofrequency ablation versus nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A42%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Midterm%20results%20of%20radiofrequency%20ablation%20versus%20nephrectomy%20for%20T1a%20renal%20cell%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20Journal%20of%20Radiology&rft.au=Takaki,%20Haruyuki&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=468&rft.pages=460-468&rft.issn=1867-1071&rft.eissn=1862-5274&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11604-010-0451-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734033299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a087e818f209b4bf4d2b01350a18f511e79cff245084fb712c1bb38ead09ff573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=740280233&rft_id=info:pmid/20661697&rfr_iscdi=true |