Loading…

Effect of Graft Type on Postoperative Liver Function Recovery in Living Liver Donors

Abstract Background Donor safety is the primary focus in living-donor liver transplantation. Although, the procedure carries a significant risk of morbidity and even death, the use of marginal living donors is a current issue of discussion. Patients and Methods Between September 2001 and October 200...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transplantation proceedings 2009-09, Vol.41 (7), p.2855-2859
Main Authors: Karakayali, H, Pehlivan, S, Yagmurdur, M.C, Savas, N, Coskun, M, Tarhan, C, Haberal, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-c6d9b37025bfb3b28782d845ad4287ed2ebba9af2084a4792828bf6a6b49b903
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-c6d9b37025bfb3b28782d845ad4287ed2ebba9af2084a4792828bf6a6b49b903
container_end_page 2859
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2855
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 41
creator Karakayali, H
Pehlivan, S
Yagmurdur, M.C
Savas, N
Coskun, M
Tarhan, C
Haberal, M
description Abstract Background Donor safety is the primary focus in living-donor liver transplantation. Although, the procedure carries a significant risk of morbidity and even death, the use of marginal living donors is a current issue of discussion. Patients and Methods Between September 2001 and October 2008, we performed 203 liver transplantation procedures using organs from living donors. Of 203 donors, 115 were men and 88 were women, with a mean (SD; range) age of 34.5 (9; 19–66) years. One hundred fifty donors were first-degree relatives of the recipients, 36 were second-degree relatives, and 17 were spouses. We did not accept grafts with remnant volume less than 40% or from donors with impaired liver function. We performed 96 right-lobe 38 left-lobe, and 69 left-lateral segmentectomies. For the right-lobe grafts, the median hepatic vein was always left in the remnant liver. The mean ratios of remnant to total donor liver volume were 42.0%, 66.8%, and 74.6% for the right-, left-, and left lateral segmentectomies, respectively. Mean hospitalization time was 7.0, 6.2, and 9.7 days, respectively. Mean operative time was 330, 324, and 324 minutes, respectively. Only 15 donors (7.8%) received autologous blood transfusions during surgery. Liver function tests including alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and bilirubin concentrations and prothrombin time were assessed postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 at outpatient follow-up, usually at week 3. Results There were no deaths; however, 26 complications occurred in 20 of 203 donors (5.2%), most of which were treated with radiologic interventions. Conclusion Larger grafts produce impaired function in the early postoperative period; however, they do not have a negative effect in the long term. The remnant volume should be measured fastidiously, and surgeons must avoid taking large volumes of liver, especially in right-lobe donors.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.07.020
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734054155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0041134509009348</els_id><sourcerecordid>734054155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-c6d9b37025bfb3b28782d845ad4287ed2ebba9af2084a4792828bf6a6b49b903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQgIMo7rj6F6QRxFO3lUe_PAiyT2FA0bmHJF2RjD3JmHQvzL83zTTL4slLXvVVVfgSQt5RqCjQ5uO-mqLy6RiDQRwqBtBX0FbA4BnZ0K7lJWsYf042AIKWlIv6grxKaQ95zwR_SS5o3za1qJsN2d1Yi2Yqgi3uorJTsTsdsQi--B7SFI4Y1eQesNjmIRa3szeTy8EfaEI-OBXOLyHnf63EdfAhptfkhVVjwjfrfEl2tze7q_ty--3u69WXbWlEI6bSNEOveQus1lZzzbq2Y0MnajWIvMaBodaqV5ZBJ5Roe9axTttGNVr0ugd-ST6cy2YTf2ZMkzy4ZHAclccwJ9lyAbWgdZ3JT2fSxJBSRCuP0R1UPEkKcnEq9_KpU7k4ldDK7DQnv13bzPqQY4-pq8QMvF8BlYwabS5kXHrkGIO6B9pl7vrMYXby4DDKZBx6g4OL-Q3kENz_3efzP2XM6LzLnX_jCdM-zNFn65LKxCTIn8svWD4B9LkIFx3_C0AxsMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734054155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Graft Type on Postoperative Liver Function Recovery in Living Liver Donors</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Karakayali, H ; Pehlivan, S ; Yagmurdur, M.C ; Savas, N ; Coskun, M ; Tarhan, C ; Haberal, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Karakayali, H ; Pehlivan, S ; Yagmurdur, M.C ; Savas, N ; Coskun, M ; Tarhan, C ; Haberal, M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Donor safety is the primary focus in living-donor liver transplantation. Although, the procedure carries a significant risk of morbidity and even death, the use of marginal living donors is a current issue of discussion. Patients and Methods Between September 2001 and October 2008, we performed 203 liver transplantation procedures using organs from living donors. Of 203 donors, 115 were men and 88 were women, with a mean (SD; range) age of 34.5 (9; 19–66) years. One hundred fifty donors were first-degree relatives of the recipients, 36 were second-degree relatives, and 17 were spouses. We did not accept grafts with remnant volume less than 40% or from donors with impaired liver function. We performed 96 right-lobe 38 left-lobe, and 69 left-lateral segmentectomies. For the right-lobe grafts, the median hepatic vein was always left in the remnant liver. The mean ratios of remnant to total donor liver volume were 42.0%, 66.8%, and 74.6% for the right-, left-, and left lateral segmentectomies, respectively. Mean hospitalization time was 7.0, 6.2, and 9.7 days, respectively. Mean operative time was 330, 324, and 324 minutes, respectively. Only 15 donors (7.8%) received autologous blood transfusions during surgery. Liver function tests including alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and bilirubin concentrations and prothrombin time were assessed postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 at outpatient follow-up, usually at week 3. Results There were no deaths; however, 26 complications occurred in 20 of 203 donors (5.2%), most of which were treated with radiologic interventions. Conclusion Larger grafts produce impaired function in the early postoperative period; however, they do not have a negative effect in the long term. The remnant volume should be measured fastidiously, and surgeons must avoid taking large volumes of liver, especially in right-lobe donors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.07.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19765456</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRPPA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Family ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fundamental immunology ; Hepatectomy - adverse effects ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Humans ; Liver Function Tests ; Liver Transplantation - methods ; Liver Transplantation - physiology ; Living Donors ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Spouses ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Tissue, organ and graft immunology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2009-09, Vol.41 (7), p.2855-2859</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-c6d9b37025bfb3b28782d845ad4287ed2ebba9af2084a4792828bf6a6b49b903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-c6d9b37025bfb3b28782d845ad4287ed2ebba9af2084a4792828bf6a6b49b903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23928,23929,25138,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22059018$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19765456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karakayali, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pehlivan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagmurdur, M.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savas, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coskun, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarhan, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haberal, M</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Graft Type on Postoperative Liver Function Recovery in Living Liver Donors</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Donor safety is the primary focus in living-donor liver transplantation. Although, the procedure carries a significant risk of morbidity and even death, the use of marginal living donors is a current issue of discussion. Patients and Methods Between September 2001 and October 2008, we performed 203 liver transplantation procedures using organs from living donors. Of 203 donors, 115 were men and 88 were women, with a mean (SD; range) age of 34.5 (9; 19–66) years. One hundred fifty donors were first-degree relatives of the recipients, 36 were second-degree relatives, and 17 were spouses. We did not accept grafts with remnant volume less than 40% or from donors with impaired liver function. We performed 96 right-lobe 38 left-lobe, and 69 left-lateral segmentectomies. For the right-lobe grafts, the median hepatic vein was always left in the remnant liver. The mean ratios of remnant to total donor liver volume were 42.0%, 66.8%, and 74.6% for the right-, left-, and left lateral segmentectomies, respectively. Mean hospitalization time was 7.0, 6.2, and 9.7 days, respectively. Mean operative time was 330, 324, and 324 minutes, respectively. Only 15 donors (7.8%) received autologous blood transfusions during surgery. Liver function tests including alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and bilirubin concentrations and prothrombin time were assessed postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 at outpatient follow-up, usually at week 3. Results There were no deaths; however, 26 complications occurred in 20 of 203 donors (5.2%), most of which were treated with radiologic interventions. Conclusion Larger grafts produce impaired function in the early postoperative period; however, they do not have a negative effect in the long term. The remnant volume should be measured fastidiously, and surgeons must avoid taking large volumes of liver, especially in right-lobe donors.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental immunology</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Function Tests</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - physiology</subject><subject>Living Donors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQgIMo7rj6F6QRxFO3lUe_PAiyT2FA0bmHJF2RjD3JmHQvzL83zTTL4slLXvVVVfgSQt5RqCjQ5uO-mqLy6RiDQRwqBtBX0FbA4BnZ0K7lJWsYf042AIKWlIv6grxKaQ95zwR_SS5o3za1qJsN2d1Yi2Yqgi3uorJTsTsdsQi--B7SFI4Y1eQesNjmIRa3szeTy8EfaEI-OBXOLyHnf63EdfAhptfkhVVjwjfrfEl2tze7q_ty--3u69WXbWlEI6bSNEOveQus1lZzzbq2Y0MnajWIvMaBodaqV5ZBJ5Roe9axTttGNVr0ugd-ST6cy2YTf2ZMkzy4ZHAclccwJ9lyAbWgdZ3JT2fSxJBSRCuP0R1UPEkKcnEq9_KpU7k4ldDK7DQnv13bzPqQY4-pq8QMvF8BlYwabS5kXHrkGIO6B9pl7vrMYXby4DDKZBx6g4OL-Q3kENz_3efzP2XM6LzLnX_jCdM-zNFn65LKxCTIn8svWD4B9LkIFx3_C0AxsMA</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Karakayali, H</creator><creator>Pehlivan, S</creator><creator>Yagmurdur, M.C</creator><creator>Savas, N</creator><creator>Coskun, M</creator><creator>Tarhan, C</creator><creator>Haberal, M</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Effect of Graft Type on Postoperative Liver Function Recovery in Living Liver Donors</title><author>Karakayali, H ; Pehlivan, S ; Yagmurdur, M.C ; Savas, N ; Coskun, M ; Tarhan, C ; Haberal, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-c6d9b37025bfb3b28782d845ad4287ed2ebba9af2084a4792828bf6a6b49b903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental immunology</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Function Tests</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - physiology</topic><topic>Living Donors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karakayali, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pehlivan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagmurdur, M.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savas, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coskun, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarhan, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haberal, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karakayali, H</au><au>Pehlivan, S</au><au>Yagmurdur, M.C</au><au>Savas, N</au><au>Coskun, M</au><au>Tarhan, C</au><au>Haberal, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Graft Type on Postoperative Liver Function Recovery in Living Liver Donors</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2855</spage><epage>2859</epage><pages>2855-2859</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><coden>TRPPA8</coden><abstract>Abstract Background Donor safety is the primary focus in living-donor liver transplantation. Although, the procedure carries a significant risk of morbidity and even death, the use of marginal living donors is a current issue of discussion. Patients and Methods Between September 2001 and October 2008, we performed 203 liver transplantation procedures using organs from living donors. Of 203 donors, 115 were men and 88 were women, with a mean (SD; range) age of 34.5 (9; 19–66) years. One hundred fifty donors were first-degree relatives of the recipients, 36 were second-degree relatives, and 17 were spouses. We did not accept grafts with remnant volume less than 40% or from donors with impaired liver function. We performed 96 right-lobe 38 left-lobe, and 69 left-lateral segmentectomies. For the right-lobe grafts, the median hepatic vein was always left in the remnant liver. The mean ratios of remnant to total donor liver volume were 42.0%, 66.8%, and 74.6% for the right-, left-, and left lateral segmentectomies, respectively. Mean hospitalization time was 7.0, 6.2, and 9.7 days, respectively. Mean operative time was 330, 324, and 324 minutes, respectively. Only 15 donors (7.8%) received autologous blood transfusions during surgery. Liver function tests including alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and bilirubin concentrations and prothrombin time were assessed postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 at outpatient follow-up, usually at week 3. Results There were no deaths; however, 26 complications occurred in 20 of 203 donors (5.2%), most of which were treated with radiologic interventions. Conclusion Larger grafts produce impaired function in the early postoperative period; however, they do not have a negative effect in the long term. The remnant volume should be measured fastidiously, and surgeons must avoid taking large volumes of liver, especially in right-lobe donors.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19765456</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.07.020</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2009-09, Vol.41 (7), p.2855-2859
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734054155
source Elsevier
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Family
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fundamental immunology
Hepatectomy - adverse effects
Hepatectomy - methods
Humans
Liver Function Tests
Liver Transplantation - methods
Liver Transplantation - physiology
Living Donors
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Spouses
Surgery
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Tissue, organ and graft immunology
Young Adult
title Effect of Graft Type on Postoperative Liver Function Recovery in Living Liver Donors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A42%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Graft%20Type%20on%20Postoperative%20Liver%20Function%20Recovery%20in%20Living%20Liver%20Donors&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Karakayali,%20H&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2855&rft.epage=2859&rft.pages=2855-2859&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft.coden=TRPPA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.07.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734054155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-c6d9b37025bfb3b28782d845ad4287ed2ebba9af2084a4792828bf6a6b49b903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734054155&rft_id=info:pmid/19765456&rfr_iscdi=true