Loading…

Presenting Features of Breast Cancer Differ by Molecular Subtype

Background Gene expression profiling of breast cancers identifies distinct molecular subtypes that affect prognosis. Our goal was to determine whether presenting features of tumors differ among molecular subtypes. Methods Subtypes were classified by immunohistochemical surrogates as luminal A (estro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of surgical oncology 2009-10, Vol.16 (10), p.2705-2710
Main Authors: Wiechmann, Lisa, Sampson, Michelle, Stempel, Michelle, Jacks, Lindsay M., Patil, Sujata M., King, Tari, Morrow, Monica
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-68f44391f40b145bf6031e0edfe8ae0bee830ee59933d5d9f8f94b6ae0df0e63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-68f44391f40b145bf6031e0edfe8ae0bee830ee59933d5d9f8f94b6ae0df0e63
container_end_page 2710
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2705
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume 16
creator Wiechmann, Lisa
Sampson, Michelle
Stempel, Michelle
Jacks, Lindsay M.
Patil, Sujata M.
King, Tari
Morrow, Monica
description Background Gene expression profiling of breast cancers identifies distinct molecular subtypes that affect prognosis. Our goal was to determine whether presenting features of tumors differ among molecular subtypes. Methods Subtypes were classified by immunohistochemical surrogates as luminal A (estrogen receptor [ER] and/or progesterone receptor [PR] positive, HER-2 −), luminal B (ER and/or PR+, HER-2 +), HER-2 (ER and PR−, HER-2 +), or basal (ER, PR, HER-2 −). Data were obtained from an established, registered database of patients with invasive breast cancer treated at our institution between January 1998 and June 2007. A total of 6,072 tumors were classifiable into molecular subtypes. The χ 2 test, analysis of variance, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine associations between subtype and clinicopathologic variables. Results The distribution of subtypes was luminal A, 71%; luminal B, 8%; HER-2 , 6%; and basal, 15%. Marked differences in age, tumor size, extent of lymph node involvement, nuclear grade, multicentric/multifocal disease, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and extensive intraductal component were observed among subtypes. When compared with luminal A tumors, those overexpressing HER-2 (luminal B, HER-2 ) were significantly more likely to manifest nodal involvement, multifocal, extensive intraductal component, and LVI ( P  
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-009-0606-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734059785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734059785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-68f44391f40b145bf6031e0edfe8ae0bee830ee59933d5d9f8f94b6ae0df0e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZvHhanXzu5qbWT6go2HvI7k5Ky3a3JruH_ntTtlAQPE2Seead8BBySeGWMiHvAgXBRQqgU1CgUnZExlTGF6FyehzPoPJUMyVH5CyEFQDNOMhTMqJaaq44G5P7L48Bm27ZLJIXtF0fr0nrkkePNnTJ1DYl-uRp6VwsxTb5aGss-9r65Lsvuu0Gz8mJs3XAi32dkPnL83z6ls4-X9-nD7O0FFx1qcqdEFxTJ6CgQhZOAacIWDnMLUKBmHNAlFpzXslKu9xpUajYqhyg4hNyM8RufPvTY-jMehlKrGvbYNsHk3EBUme5jOT1H3LV9r6JfzOMZZwLkdEI0QEqfRuCR2c2frm2fmsomJ1bM7g10a3ZuTUszlztg_tijdVhYi8zAmwAQmw1C_SHzf-n_gIUUYMm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227334471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Presenting Features of Breast Cancer Differ by Molecular Subtype</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Wiechmann, Lisa ; Sampson, Michelle ; Stempel, Michelle ; Jacks, Lindsay M. ; Patil, Sujata M. ; King, Tari ; Morrow, Monica</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiechmann, Lisa ; Sampson, Michelle ; Stempel, Michelle ; Jacks, Lindsay M. ; Patil, Sujata M. ; King, Tari ; Morrow, Monica</creatorcontrib><description>Background Gene expression profiling of breast cancers identifies distinct molecular subtypes that affect prognosis. Our goal was to determine whether presenting features of tumors differ among molecular subtypes. Methods Subtypes were classified by immunohistochemical surrogates as luminal A (estrogen receptor [ER] and/or progesterone receptor [PR] positive, HER-2 −), luminal B (ER and/or PR+, HER-2 +), HER-2 (ER and PR−, HER-2 +), or basal (ER, PR, HER-2 −). Data were obtained from an established, registered database of patients with invasive breast cancer treated at our institution between January 1998 and June 2007. A total of 6,072 tumors were classifiable into molecular subtypes. The χ 2 test, analysis of variance, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine associations between subtype and clinicopathologic variables. Results The distribution of subtypes was luminal A, 71%; luminal B, 8%; HER-2 , 6%; and basal, 15%. Marked differences in age, tumor size, extent of lymph node involvement, nuclear grade, multicentric/multifocal disease, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and extensive intraductal component were observed among subtypes. When compared with luminal A tumors, those overexpressing HER-2 (luminal B, HER-2 ) were significantly more likely to manifest nodal involvement, multifocal, extensive intraductal component, and LVI ( P  &lt; 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, after controlling for patient age, tumor size, LVI, and nuclear grade, HER-2 subtype tumors were 2.0 times more likely to have four or more metastatic lymph nodes ( P  &lt; 0.0001) and 1.6 times more likely to have multifocal disease ( P  &lt; 0.0001) compared with patients with luminal A. Conclusions Tumor presentation varies among molecular subtypes; this information may be useful in selecting local therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy and lymph nodes evaluation before surgery or neoadjuvant therapy are likely to be beneficial in HER-2 -overexpressing tumors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0606-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19593632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Breast Oncology ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neoplasms, Basal Cell - diagnosis ; Neoplasms, Basal Cell - metabolism ; Oncology ; Prognosis ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism ; Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism ; Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2009-10, Vol.16 (10), p.2705-2710</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-68f44391f40b145bf6031e0edfe8ae0bee830ee59933d5d9f8f94b6ae0df0e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-68f44391f40b145bf6031e0edfe8ae0bee830ee59933d5d9f8f94b6ae0df0e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19593632$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiechmann, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampson, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stempel, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacks, Lindsay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patil, Sujata M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Tari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrow, Monica</creatorcontrib><title>Presenting Features of Breast Cancer Differ by Molecular Subtype</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background Gene expression profiling of breast cancers identifies distinct molecular subtypes that affect prognosis. Our goal was to determine whether presenting features of tumors differ among molecular subtypes. Methods Subtypes were classified by immunohistochemical surrogates as luminal A (estrogen receptor [ER] and/or progesterone receptor [PR] positive, HER-2 −), luminal B (ER and/or PR+, HER-2 +), HER-2 (ER and PR−, HER-2 +), or basal (ER, PR, HER-2 −). Data were obtained from an established, registered database of patients with invasive breast cancer treated at our institution between January 1998 and June 2007. A total of 6,072 tumors were classifiable into molecular subtypes. The χ 2 test, analysis of variance, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine associations between subtype and clinicopathologic variables. Results The distribution of subtypes was luminal A, 71%; luminal B, 8%; HER-2 , 6%; and basal, 15%. Marked differences in age, tumor size, extent of lymph node involvement, nuclear grade, multicentric/multifocal disease, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and extensive intraductal component were observed among subtypes. When compared with luminal A tumors, those overexpressing HER-2 (luminal B, HER-2 ) were significantly more likely to manifest nodal involvement, multifocal, extensive intraductal component, and LVI ( P  &lt; 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, after controlling for patient age, tumor size, LVI, and nuclear grade, HER-2 subtype tumors were 2.0 times more likely to have four or more metastatic lymph nodes ( P  &lt; 0.0001) and 1.6 times more likely to have multifocal disease ( P  &lt; 0.0001) compared with patients with luminal A. Conclusions Tumor presentation varies among molecular subtypes; this information may be useful in selecting local therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy and lymph nodes evaluation before surgery or neoadjuvant therapy are likely to be beneficial in HER-2 -overexpressing tumors.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Oncology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Basal Cell - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Basal Cell - metabolism</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZvHhanXzu5qbWT6go2HvI7k5Ky3a3JruH_ntTtlAQPE2Seead8BBySeGWMiHvAgXBRQqgU1CgUnZExlTGF6FyehzPoPJUMyVH5CyEFQDNOMhTMqJaaq44G5P7L48Bm27ZLJIXtF0fr0nrkkePNnTJ1DYl-uRp6VwsxTb5aGss-9r65Lsvuu0Gz8mJs3XAi32dkPnL83z6ls4-X9-nD7O0FFx1qcqdEFxTJ6CgQhZOAacIWDnMLUKBmHNAlFpzXslKu9xpUajYqhyg4hNyM8RufPvTY-jMehlKrGvbYNsHk3EBUme5jOT1H3LV9r6JfzOMZZwLkdEI0QEqfRuCR2c2frm2fmsomJ1bM7g10a3ZuTUszlztg_tijdVhYi8zAmwAQmw1C_SHzf-n_gIUUYMm</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Wiechmann, Lisa</creator><creator>Sampson, Michelle</creator><creator>Stempel, Michelle</creator><creator>Jacks, Lindsay M.</creator><creator>Patil, Sujata M.</creator><creator>King, Tari</creator><creator>Morrow, Monica</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Presenting Features of Breast Cancer Differ by Molecular Subtype</title><author>Wiechmann, Lisa ; Sampson, Michelle ; Stempel, Michelle ; Jacks, Lindsay M. ; Patil, Sujata M. ; King, Tari ; Morrow, Monica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-68f44391f40b145bf6031e0edfe8ae0bee830ee59933d5d9f8f94b6ae0df0e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Oncology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Basal Cell - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Basal Cell - metabolism</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiechmann, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampson, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stempel, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacks, Lindsay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patil, Sujata M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Tari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrow, Monica</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiechmann, Lisa</au><au>Sampson, Michelle</au><au>Stempel, Michelle</au><au>Jacks, Lindsay M.</au><au>Patil, Sujata M.</au><au>King, Tari</au><au>Morrow, Monica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Presenting Features of Breast Cancer Differ by Molecular Subtype</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2705</spage><epage>2710</epage><pages>2705-2710</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background Gene expression profiling of breast cancers identifies distinct molecular subtypes that affect prognosis. Our goal was to determine whether presenting features of tumors differ among molecular subtypes. Methods Subtypes were classified by immunohistochemical surrogates as luminal A (estrogen receptor [ER] and/or progesterone receptor [PR] positive, HER-2 −), luminal B (ER and/or PR+, HER-2 +), HER-2 (ER and PR−, HER-2 +), or basal (ER, PR, HER-2 −). Data were obtained from an established, registered database of patients with invasive breast cancer treated at our institution between January 1998 and June 2007. A total of 6,072 tumors were classifiable into molecular subtypes. The χ 2 test, analysis of variance, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine associations between subtype and clinicopathologic variables. Results The distribution of subtypes was luminal A, 71%; luminal B, 8%; HER-2 , 6%; and basal, 15%. Marked differences in age, tumor size, extent of lymph node involvement, nuclear grade, multicentric/multifocal disease, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and extensive intraductal component were observed among subtypes. When compared with luminal A tumors, those overexpressing HER-2 (luminal B, HER-2 ) were significantly more likely to manifest nodal involvement, multifocal, extensive intraductal component, and LVI ( P  &lt; 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, after controlling for patient age, tumor size, LVI, and nuclear grade, HER-2 subtype tumors were 2.0 times more likely to have four or more metastatic lymph nodes ( P  &lt; 0.0001) and 1.6 times more likely to have multifocal disease ( P  &lt; 0.0001) compared with patients with luminal A. Conclusions Tumor presentation varies among molecular subtypes; this information may be useful in selecting local therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy and lymph nodes evaluation before surgery or neoadjuvant therapy are likely to be beneficial in HER-2 -overexpressing tumors.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19593632</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-009-0606-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-9265
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2009-10, Vol.16 (10), p.2705-2710
issn 1068-9265
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734059785
source Springer Nature
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - metabolism
Breast Oncology
Female
Humans
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphatic Metastasis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplasms, Basal Cell - diagnosis
Neoplasms, Basal Cell - metabolism
Oncology
Prognosis
Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism
Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism
Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Young Adult
title Presenting Features of Breast Cancer Differ by Molecular Subtype
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A32%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Presenting%20Features%20of%20Breast%20Cancer%20Differ%20by%20Molecular%20Subtype&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Wiechmann,%20Lisa&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2705&rft.epage=2710&rft.pages=2705-2710&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-009-0606-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734059785%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-68f44391f40b145bf6031e0edfe8ae0bee830ee59933d5d9f8f94b6ae0df0e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227334471&rft_id=info:pmid/19593632&rfr_iscdi=true