Loading…
Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma
Objective:To test Goldman's dilemma on a general population sample by asking whether they would take the Faustian bargain of a drug that guaranteed sporting success but would result in their death in 5 years' time. Between 1982 and 1995 a bi-annual survey using this dilemma suggested half...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of sports medicine 2009-10, Vol.43 (11), p.871-872 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-e5420239ff9b1ac2251bd19349195ff4822f3a13c1505d7ee80ea4b3bb7881a93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-e5420239ff9b1ac2251bd19349195ff4822f3a13c1505d7ee80ea4b3bb7881a93 |
container_end_page | 872 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 871 |
container_title | British journal of sports medicine |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Connor, J M Mazanov, J |
description | Objective:To test Goldman's dilemma on a general population sample by asking whether they would take the Faustian bargain of a drug that guaranteed sporting success but would result in their death in 5 years' time. Between 1982 and 1995 a bi-annual survey using this dilemma suggested half of all elite athletes would take the drug.Design:A random telephone survey of 250 members of the Australian general public, with counterbalanced presentation of success and death.Main outcome measures:Respondents gave age, gender, sports engagement and response to the dilemma (yes/no).Results:Only two of a sample of 250 reported they would take the bargain offered by the dilemma.Conclusions:Athletes differ markedly from the general population in response to the dilemma. This raises significant practical and ethical dilemmas for athlete support personnel. The psychometry of the dilemma needs to be established more comprehensively for general and athlete populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjsm.2009.057596 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734113399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4012878771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-e5420239ff9b1ac2251bd19349195ff4822f3a13c1505d7ee80ea4b3bb7881a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1P3DAQBmALUcEWuHOqLHroocoy4484PtHVqqUVCC583Sx745QsSRziRIJ_T1ZZtVKlipMP88x4NC8hxwhzRJ6eunWs5wxAz0EqqdMdMkOheAIig10yAw5pwlMl9snHGNcAyCRke2QfNUOUWToj3-7DUOX0NQw0D60_owv62ze-sxVtQztUti9DQ3sfexoK2j96eh6qvLYNzcvK17U9JB8KW0V_tH0PyO2P7zfLn8nl9fmv5eIycYKpPvFSMGBcF4V2aFeMSXQ5ai40alkUImOs4Bb5CiXIXHmfgbfCcedUlqHV_IB8mea2XXgexn1MXcaVryrb-DBEo7gYT8L1Rp78I9dh6JpxOYNaSKYZVyP6_F-klAYFXIlRwaRWXYix84Vpu7K23atBMJsEzCYBs0nATAmMLZ-2gwdX-_xvw_bkI0gmUMbev_yp2-7JpIoraa7ulmZ58QCIF8rw0X-dvKvX73__BjIcmw4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779070374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma</title><source>BMJ Journals</source><creator>Connor, J M ; Mazanov, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Connor, J M ; Mazanov, J</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:To test Goldman's dilemma on a general population sample by asking whether they would take the Faustian bargain of a drug that guaranteed sporting success but would result in their death in 5 years' time. Between 1982 and 1995 a bi-annual survey using this dilemma suggested half of all elite athletes would take the drug.Design:A random telephone survey of 250 members of the Australian general public, with counterbalanced presentation of success and death.Main outcome measures:Respondents gave age, gender, sports engagement and response to the dilemma (yes/no).Results:Only two of a sample of 250 reported they would take the bargain offered by the dilemma.Conclusions:Athletes differ markedly from the general population in response to the dilemma. This raises significant practical and ethical dilemmas for athlete support personnel. The psychometry of the dilemma needs to be established more comprehensively for general and athlete populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-3674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-0480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.057596</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19211586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Athletes ; Athletes - psychology ; Attitude to Health ; Australia ; Decision making ; Doping in Sports - ethics ; Doping in Sports - psychology ; Drug use ; Drugs ; Drugs & sports ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Olympic games ; Population ; Public Opinion ; Sanctions ; Sports medicine ; Success ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of sports medicine, 2009-10, Vol.43 (11), p.871-872</ispartof><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group Oct 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-e5420239ff9b1ac2251bd19349195ff4822f3a13c1505d7ee80ea4b3bb7881a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-e5420239ff9b1ac2251bd19349195ff4822f3a13c1505d7ee80ea4b3bb7881a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bjsm.bmj.com/content/43/11/871.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bjsm.bmj.com/content/43/11/871.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,314,780,784,3194,27924,27925,77594,77595</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19211586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Connor, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazanov, J</creatorcontrib><title>Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma</title><title>British journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Br J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Objective:To test Goldman's dilemma on a general population sample by asking whether they would take the Faustian bargain of a drug that guaranteed sporting success but would result in their death in 5 years' time. Between 1982 and 1995 a bi-annual survey using this dilemma suggested half of all elite athletes would take the drug.Design:A random telephone survey of 250 members of the Australian general public, with counterbalanced presentation of success and death.Main outcome measures:Respondents gave age, gender, sports engagement and response to the dilemma (yes/no).Results:Only two of a sample of 250 reported they would take the bargain offered by the dilemma.Conclusions:Athletes differ markedly from the general population in response to the dilemma. This raises significant practical and ethical dilemmas for athlete support personnel. The psychometry of the dilemma needs to be established more comprehensively for general and athlete populations.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Athletes - psychology</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Doping in Sports - ethics</subject><subject>Doping in Sports - psychology</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Drugs & sports</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Olympic games</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0306-3674</issn><issn>1473-0480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U1P3DAQBmALUcEWuHOqLHroocoy4484PtHVqqUVCC583Sx745QsSRziRIJ_T1ZZtVKlipMP88x4NC8hxwhzRJ6eunWs5wxAz0EqqdMdMkOheAIig10yAw5pwlMl9snHGNcAyCRke2QfNUOUWToj3-7DUOX0NQw0D60_owv62ze-sxVtQztUti9DQ3sfexoK2j96eh6qvLYNzcvK17U9JB8KW0V_tH0PyO2P7zfLn8nl9fmv5eIycYKpPvFSMGBcF4V2aFeMSXQ5ai40alkUImOs4Bb5CiXIXHmfgbfCcedUlqHV_IB8mea2XXgexn1MXcaVryrb-DBEo7gYT8L1Rp78I9dh6JpxOYNaSKYZVyP6_F-klAYFXIlRwaRWXYix84Vpu7K23atBMJsEzCYBs0nATAmMLZ-2gwdX-_xvw_bkI0gmUMbev_yp2-7JpIoraa7ulmZ58QCIF8rw0X-dvKvX73__BjIcmw4</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Connor, J M</creator><creator>Mazanov, J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma</title><author>Connor, J M ; Mazanov, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-e5420239ff9b1ac2251bd19349195ff4822f3a13c1505d7ee80ea4b3bb7881a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Athletes - psychology</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Doping in Sports - ethics</topic><topic>Doping in Sports - psychology</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Drugs & sports</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Olympic games</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Connor, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazanov, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Connor, J M</au><au>Mazanov, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma</atitle><jtitle>British journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>871</spage><epage>872</epage><pages>871-872</pages><issn>0306-3674</issn><eissn>1473-0480</eissn><abstract>Objective:To test Goldman's dilemma on a general population sample by asking whether they would take the Faustian bargain of a drug that guaranteed sporting success but would result in their death in 5 years' time. Between 1982 and 1995 a bi-annual survey using this dilemma suggested half of all elite athletes would take the drug.Design:A random telephone survey of 250 members of the Australian general public, with counterbalanced presentation of success and death.Main outcome measures:Respondents gave age, gender, sports engagement and response to the dilemma (yes/no).Results:Only two of a sample of 250 reported they would take the bargain offered by the dilemma.Conclusions:Athletes differ markedly from the general population in response to the dilemma. This raises significant practical and ethical dilemmas for athlete support personnel. The psychometry of the dilemma needs to be established more comprehensively for general and athlete populations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</pub><pmid>19211586</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjsm.2009.057596</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-3674 |
ispartof | British journal of sports medicine, 2009-10, Vol.43 (11), p.871-872 |
issn | 0306-3674 1473-0480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734113399 |
source | BMJ Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Athletes Athletes - psychology Attitude to Health Australia Decision making Doping in Sports - ethics Doping in Sports - psychology Drug use Drugs Drugs & sports Epidemiology Female Humans Male Medicine Middle Aged Olympic games Population Public Opinion Sanctions Sports medicine Success Young Adult |
title | Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A14%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Would%20you%20dope?%20A%20general%20population%20test%20of%20the%20Goldman%20dilemma&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Connor,%20J%20M&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=871&rft.epage=872&rft.pages=871-872&rft.issn=0306-3674&rft.eissn=1473-0480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjsm.2009.057596&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4012878771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b427t-e5420239ff9b1ac2251bd19349195ff4822f3a13c1505d7ee80ea4b3bb7881a93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779070374&rft_id=info:pmid/19211586&rfr_iscdi=true |