Severity of illness and priority setting in healthcare: A review of the literature

Abstract Background It is widely assumed that the principal objective of healthcare is to maximise health. However, people may be willing to sacrifice aggregate health gain in order to direct resources towards those who are worst off in terms of the severity of their pre-treatment health state. Obje...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health policy (Amsterdam) 2009-12, Vol.93 (2), p.77-84
Main Author: Shah, Koonal K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Delivery of Health Care
Economic analysis
Estimation
Health
Health administration
Health care
Health Care Rationing
Health care rationing Quality-adjusted life years Severity Health maximisation Public preferences
Health maximisation
Humans
Internal Medicine
Preferences
Prioritizing
Public preferences
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Rationing
Resource allocation
Sacrifices
Severity
Severity of Illness Index
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background It is widely assumed that the principal objective of healthcare is to maximise health. However, people may be willing to sacrifice aggregate health gain in order to direct resources towards those who are worst off in terms of the severity of their pre-treatment health state. Objectives This paper reviews the literature on severity in the context of economic evaluation, with the aim of establishing the extent to which popular preferences concerning severity imply a departure from the health maximisation objective. Methods Data were obtained using a keyword search of major databases and a hand search of articles written by leading researchers in the subject area. Results The empirical evidence suggests that people are, on the whole, willing to sacrifice aggregate health in order to give priority to the severely ill. However, there remain unresolved issues regarding the elicitation and interpretation of severity preferences (and indeed popular preferences generally). Conclusions The use of severity as a priority setting criterion is supported by a large number of empirical studies of popular preferences. Further work is needed, however, to accurately estimate the strength of this support.
ISSN:0168-8510
1872-6054
DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.08.005