Translation of mRNAs from Vesicular Stomatitis Virus and Vaccinia Virus Is Differentially Blocked in Cells with Depletion of eIF4GI and/or eIF4GII

• Published in: Journal of molecular biology 2009-12, Vol.394 (3), p.506-521
• Main Authors: Welnowska, Ewelina, Castelló, Alfredo, Moral, Pablo, Carrasco, Luis
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Base Sequence; Cysteine Endopeptidases - metabolism; eIF4G; Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4G - antagonists & inhibitors; Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4G - genetics; Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4G - metabolism; HeLa Cells; Humans; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; initiation factors; Poliovirus; Protein Biosynthesis; Ribosomes - metabolism; RNA, Messenger - genetics; RNA, Messenger - metabolism; RNA, Small Interfering - genetics; RNA, Viral - genetics; RNA, Viral - metabolism; siRNAs; Vaccinia virus; Vaccinia virus - genetics; Vaccinia virus - metabolism; Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus - genetics; Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus - metabolism; Vesicular stomatitis virus; Viral Proteins - biosynthesis; Viral Proteins - metabolism
• ISSN: 0022-2836; 1089-8638
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.09.036

Cytolytic viruses abrogate host protein synthesis to maximize the translation of their own mRNAs. In this study, we analyzed the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4G requirement for translation of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and vaccinia virus (VV) mRNAs in HeLa cells using two different strategies: eIF4G depletion by small interfering RNAs or cleavage of eIF4G by expression of poliovirus 2A protease. Depletion of eIF4GI or eIF4GII moderately inhibits cellular protein synthesis, whereas silencing of both factors has only a slightly higher effect. Under these conditions, the extent of VSV protein synthesis is similar to that of nondepleted control cells, whereas VV expression is substantially reduced. Similar results were obtained when eIF4E was depleted. On the other hand, eIF4G cleavage by poliovirus 2A protease strongly inhibits translation of VV protein expression, whereas translation directed by VSV mRNAs is not abrogated, even though VSV mRNAs are capped. Therefore, the requirement for eIF4F activity is different for VV and VSV, suggesting that the molecular mechanism by which their mRNAs initiate their translation is also different. Consistent with these findings, eIF4GI does not colocalize with ribosomes in VSV-infected cells, while eIF2α locates at perinuclear sites coincident with ribosomes.