Does methodology affect the ability to monitor tobacco control activities? implications for HEDIS and other performance measures

It is unclear whether methodological differences in sample size, survey methods, and analysis approach significantly affect the ability to accurately monitor tobacco control activities and to make rate comparisons. Questionnaires were sent to 64,764 members of nine health plans in diverse settings s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Preventive medicine 2003-07, Vol.37 (1), p.33-40
Main Authors: Solberg, Leif I, Hollis, Jack A, Stevens, Victor J, Rigotti, Nancy A, Quinn, Virginia P, Aickin, Mikel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Counseling
Data Collection - methods
Female
Health surveys
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postal Service
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Research design
Sample Size
Smoking - epidemiology
Smoking cessation
Smoking Cessation - statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
Telephone
United States - epidemiology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It is unclear whether methodological differences in sample size, survey methods, and analysis approach significantly affect the ability to accurately monitor tobacco control activities and to make rate comparisons. Questionnaires were sent to 64,764 members of nine health plans in diverse settings soon after their visit to a primary care clinician. Of these 41,677 completed responses were received. We compared responses received by mail and by telephone follow-up for the percentage of smokers, characteristics of smokers, and their rates of reporting physician cessation counseling. Overall, 10.2% were current cigarette smokers, but the proportion was 8.6% for mail responders and 17.2% for phone follow-up responders. Smokers identified by phone follow-up were different from mail responders in most demographic and smoking characteristics and their reports of clinical smoking cessation activities differed for six of nine clinician smoking cessation actions. Calculating advice rates as a proportion of visits produced lower rates with more dispersion among plan rates than doing so without accounting for visit variation. Smoking surveys using only mailed questionnaires dramatically undersample smokers, especially in some demographic groups. Comparisons of tobacco counseling among health plans can be improved by ensuring an adequate sample size and response rate and by analyzing by frequency of quit advice.
ISSN:0091-7435
1096-0260
DOI:10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00054-9