Loading…

Lack of Clinical Benefit of Improved Angiographic Results With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Paclitaxel and Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: There is limited information regarding the angiographic and clinical outcomes among the different drug-eluting stents (DESs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and Results: A total 355 consecutive AMI patients w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation Journal 2009, Vol.73(12), pp.2229-2235
Main Authors: Choi, Cheol Ung, Rha, Seung-Woon, Chen, Kang-Yin, Li, Yong-Jian, Poddar, Kanhaiya L., Jin, Zhe, Minami, Yoshiyasu, Suh, Soon Yong, Na, Jin Oh, Lim, Hong Euy, Kim, Jin Won, Kim, Eung Ju, Park, Chang Gyu, Seo, Hong Seog, Oh, Dong Joo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: There is limited information regarding the angiographic and clinical outcomes among the different drug-eluting stents (DESs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and Results: A total 355 consecutive AMI patients who underwent PCI with a sirolimus- (SES, n=116) or paclitaxel- (PES, n=153) or zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES, n=86) were enrolled. The 6-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared among the 3 groups. At 6 months, there was a trend toward a higher incidence of binary restenosis in the PES group (SES: 8.6%, PES: 19.8%, ZES: 8.3%, P=0.052). Percentage of restenosis was higher in the PES group compared with SES, but was similar to ZES (SES: 18.75 ±18.16%, PES: 29.32 ±24.16%, ZES: 23.91 ±17.03%, P=0.006). Late loss was lower in the SES group compared with PES and ZES (SES: 0.44 ±0.52, PES: 0.83 ±0.87, ZES: 0.75 ±0.63, P
ISSN:1346-9843
1347-4820
DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-08-1086