Loading…
lethal ovitrap-based mass trapping scheme for dengue control in Australia: I. Public acceptability and performance of lethal ovitraps
We report on the first field evaluation of the public acceptability and performance of two types of lethal ovitrap (LO) in three separate trials in Cairns, Australia. Health workers were able to set standard lethal ovitraps (SLOs) in 75 and 71% of premise yards in the wet and dry season, respectivel...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Medical and veterinary entomology 2009-12, Vol.23 (4), p.295-302 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5453-13677c8acc8cb12c0c66761edaf8b80c414f2aba3024294a0aa3457d1b0a2b153 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5453-13677c8acc8cb12c0c66761edaf8b80c414f2aba3024294a0aa3457d1b0a2b153 |
| container_end_page | 302 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 295 |
| container_title | Medical and veterinary entomology |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | RITCHIE, S.A RAPLEY, L.P WILLIAMS, C JOHNSON, P.H LARKMAN, M SILCOCK, R.M LONG, S.A RUSSELL, R.C |
| description | We report on the first field evaluation of the public acceptability and performance of two types of lethal ovitrap (LO) in three separate trials in Cairns, Australia. Health workers were able to set standard lethal ovitraps (SLOs) in 75 and 71% of premise yards in the wet and dry season, respectively, and biodegradable lethal ovitraps (BLOs) in 93% of yards. Public acceptance, measured as retention of traps by residents, was high for both trap types, with |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00833.x |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734158652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734158652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5453-13677c8acc8cb12c0c66761edaf8b80c414f2aba3024294a0aa3457d1b0a2b153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhi0EokPhFcA7Vkl9iXNBbKq2tJWmpRUUZmedOM7Ug3PBTujMA_S9ccioiB3e2Ef-_v_I_zFCmJKYhnW0iSlPRcQKKmJGSBETknMeb5-hxdPFc7QgLC0ilvPVAXrl_YYQmhWMvUQHtCgSKgqxQI9WD_dgcffLDA76qASvK9yA93iqe9OusVf3utG47hyudLseNVZdO7jOYtPi49EH0Br4gC9jfDOW1igMSul-gNJYM-wwtBXutQv6BlqlcVfjf7v61-hFDdbrN_v9EN19Ovt6chEtP59fnhwvIyUSwaPwtixTeXDPVUmZIipNs5TqCuq8zIlKaFIzKIETlrAiAQLAE5FVtCTASir4IXo_-_au-zlqP8jGeKWthVZ3o5cZD7HkqWCBzGdSuc57p2vZO9OA20lK5DQDuZFT1HKKWk4zkH9mILdB-nbfZCwbXf0V7kMPwMcZeDBW7_7bWF59OwuHII9mufGD3j7Jwf2QacYzIb9fn8tkeUtOb1YreRv4dzNfQydh7YyXd18YoTx8ByIISflvGW-vgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734158652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>lethal ovitrap-based mass trapping scheme for dengue control in Australia: I. Public acceptability and performance of lethal ovitraps</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>RITCHIE, S.A ; RAPLEY, L.P ; WILLIAMS, C ; JOHNSON, P.H ; LARKMAN, M ; SILCOCK, R.M ; LONG, S.A ; RUSSELL, R.C</creator><creatorcontrib>RITCHIE, S.A ; RAPLEY, L.P ; WILLIAMS, C ; JOHNSON, P.H ; LARKMAN, M ; SILCOCK, R.M ; LONG, S.A ; RUSSELL, R.C</creatorcontrib><description>We report on the first field evaluation of the public acceptability and performance of two types of lethal ovitrap (LO) in three separate trials in Cairns, Australia. Health workers were able to set standard lethal ovitraps (SLOs) in 75 and 71% of premise yards in the wet and dry season, respectively, and biodegradable lethal ovitraps (BLOs) in 93% of yards. Public acceptance, measured as retention of traps by residents, was high for both trap types, with <9% of traps missing after 4 weeks. Traps retaining water after 4 weeks were 78 and 34% for the two SLO trials and 58% for the BLOs. The 'failure rate' in the 535 BLOs set in the field for 4 weeks was 47%, of which 19% were lost, 51% had holes from probable insect chewing, 23% were knocked over, 7% had dried by evaporation and 1% were split. There was no significant difference in the failure rate of BLOs set on porous (grass, soil and mulch) versus solid (tiles, concrete, wood and stone) substrates. The SLOs and the BLOs were readily acceptable to ovipositing Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae); the mean number of eggs/trap was 6 and 15, for the dry season and wet season SLO trial, respectively, and 15 for the BLO wet season trial. Indeed, 84-94% of premise yards had egg positive SLOs or BLOs. A high percentage of both wet and dry season SLOs (29 and 70%, respectively) and BLOs (62%) that were dry after 4 weeks were egg positive, indicating the traps had functioned. Lethal strips from SLOs and BLOs that had been exposed for 4 weeks killed 83 and 74%, respectively, of gravid Ae. aegypti in laboratory assays. These results indicate that mass trapping schemes using SLOs and BLOs are not rejected by the public and effectively target gravid Ae. aegypti. The impact of the interventions on mosquito populations is described in a companion paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-283X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00833.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19941595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aedes - virology ; Aedes aegypti ; Animals ; Australia ; biodegradable lethal ovitrap ; biodegradable ovitraps ; biodegradable products ; dengue ; Dengue - prevention & control ; Dengue - transmission ; Dengue - virology ; Dengue Virus - growth & development ; dry season ; equipment design ; equipment performance ; Female ; Humans ; insect vectors ; Insect Vectors - virology ; lethal ovitrap ; Lure and Kill ; lure and kill traps ; mass trapping ; mortality ; mosquito control ; Mosquito Control - methods ; Mosquito Control - standards ; Oviposition ; ovitraps ; Public Health ; public opinion ; Queensland ; Seasons ; trapping ; vector control ; wet season</subject><ispartof>Medical and veterinary entomology, 2009-12, Vol.23 (4), p.295-302</ispartof><rights>2009 Queensland Health. Journal compilation © 2009 The Royal Entomological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5453-13677c8acc8cb12c0c66761edaf8b80c414f2aba3024294a0aa3457d1b0a2b153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5453-13677c8acc8cb12c0c66761edaf8b80c414f2aba3024294a0aa3457d1b0a2b153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19941595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RITCHIE, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAPLEY, L.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LARKMAN, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SILCOCK, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONG, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSSELL, R.C</creatorcontrib><title>lethal ovitrap-based mass trapping scheme for dengue control in Australia: I. Public acceptability and performance of lethal ovitraps</title><title>Medical and veterinary entomology</title><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><description>We report on the first field evaluation of the public acceptability and performance of two types of lethal ovitrap (LO) in three separate trials in Cairns, Australia. Health workers were able to set standard lethal ovitraps (SLOs) in 75 and 71% of premise yards in the wet and dry season, respectively, and biodegradable lethal ovitraps (BLOs) in 93% of yards. Public acceptance, measured as retention of traps by residents, was high for both trap types, with <9% of traps missing after 4 weeks. Traps retaining water after 4 weeks were 78 and 34% for the two SLO trials and 58% for the BLOs. The 'failure rate' in the 535 BLOs set in the field for 4 weeks was 47%, of which 19% were lost, 51% had holes from probable insect chewing, 23% were knocked over, 7% had dried by evaporation and 1% were split. There was no significant difference in the failure rate of BLOs set on porous (grass, soil and mulch) versus solid (tiles, concrete, wood and stone) substrates. The SLOs and the BLOs were readily acceptable to ovipositing Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae); the mean number of eggs/trap was 6 and 15, for the dry season and wet season SLO trial, respectively, and 15 for the BLO wet season trial. Indeed, 84-94% of premise yards had egg positive SLOs or BLOs. A high percentage of both wet and dry season SLOs (29 and 70%, respectively) and BLOs (62%) that were dry after 4 weeks were egg positive, indicating the traps had functioned. Lethal strips from SLOs and BLOs that had been exposed for 4 weeks killed 83 and 74%, respectively, of gravid Ae. aegypti in laboratory assays. These results indicate that mass trapping schemes using SLOs and BLOs are not rejected by the public and effectively target gravid Ae. aegypti. The impact of the interventions on mosquito populations is described in a companion paper.</description><subject>Aedes - virology</subject><subject>Aedes aegypti</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>biodegradable lethal ovitrap</subject><subject>biodegradable ovitraps</subject><subject>biodegradable products</subject><subject>dengue</subject><subject>Dengue - prevention & control</subject><subject>Dengue - transmission</subject><subject>Dengue - virology</subject><subject>Dengue Virus - growth & development</subject><subject>dry season</subject><subject>equipment design</subject><subject>equipment performance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>insect vectors</subject><subject>Insect Vectors - virology</subject><subject>lethal ovitrap</subject><subject>Lure and Kill</subject><subject>lure and kill traps</subject><subject>mass trapping</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>mosquito control</subject><subject>Mosquito Control - methods</subject><subject>Mosquito Control - standards</subject><subject>Oviposition</subject><subject>ovitraps</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>public opinion</subject><subject>Queensland</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>trapping</subject><subject>vector control</subject><subject>wet season</subject><issn>0269-283X</issn><issn>1365-2915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhi0EokPhFcA7Vkl9iXNBbKq2tJWmpRUUZmedOM7Ug3PBTujMA_S9ccioiB3e2Ef-_v_I_zFCmJKYhnW0iSlPRcQKKmJGSBETknMeb5-hxdPFc7QgLC0ilvPVAXrl_YYQmhWMvUQHtCgSKgqxQI9WD_dgcffLDA76qASvK9yA93iqe9OusVf3utG47hyudLseNVZdO7jOYtPi49EH0Br4gC9jfDOW1igMSul-gNJYM-wwtBXutQv6BlqlcVfjf7v61-hFDdbrN_v9EN19Ovt6chEtP59fnhwvIyUSwaPwtixTeXDPVUmZIipNs5TqCuq8zIlKaFIzKIETlrAiAQLAE5FVtCTASir4IXo_-_au-zlqP8jGeKWthVZ3o5cZD7HkqWCBzGdSuc57p2vZO9OA20lK5DQDuZFT1HKKWk4zkH9mILdB-nbfZCwbXf0V7kMPwMcZeDBW7_7bWF59OwuHII9mufGD3j7Jwf2QacYzIb9fn8tkeUtOb1YreRv4dzNfQydh7YyXd18YoTx8ByIISflvGW-vgw</recordid><startdate>200912</startdate><enddate>200912</enddate><creator>RITCHIE, S.A</creator><creator>RAPLEY, L.P</creator><creator>WILLIAMS, C</creator><creator>JOHNSON, P.H</creator><creator>LARKMAN, M</creator><creator>SILCOCK, R.M</creator><creator>LONG, S.A</creator><creator>RUSSELL, R.C</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200912</creationdate><title>lethal ovitrap-based mass trapping scheme for dengue control in Australia: I. Public acceptability and performance of lethal ovitraps</title><author>RITCHIE, S.A ; RAPLEY, L.P ; WILLIAMS, C ; JOHNSON, P.H ; LARKMAN, M ; SILCOCK, R.M ; LONG, S.A ; RUSSELL, R.C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5453-13677c8acc8cb12c0c66761edaf8b80c414f2aba3024294a0aa3457d1b0a2b153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aedes - virology</topic><topic>Aedes aegypti</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>biodegradable lethal ovitrap</topic><topic>biodegradable ovitraps</topic><topic>biodegradable products</topic><topic>dengue</topic><topic>Dengue - prevention & control</topic><topic>Dengue - transmission</topic><topic>Dengue - virology</topic><topic>Dengue Virus - growth & development</topic><topic>dry season</topic><topic>equipment design</topic><topic>equipment performance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>insect vectors</topic><topic>Insect Vectors - virology</topic><topic>lethal ovitrap</topic><topic>Lure and Kill</topic><topic>lure and kill traps</topic><topic>mass trapping</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>mosquito control</topic><topic>Mosquito Control - methods</topic><topic>Mosquito Control - standards</topic><topic>Oviposition</topic><topic>ovitraps</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>public opinion</topic><topic>Queensland</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>trapping</topic><topic>vector control</topic><topic>wet season</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RITCHIE, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAPLEY, L.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LARKMAN, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SILCOCK, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONG, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSSELL, R.C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RITCHIE, S.A</au><au>RAPLEY, L.P</au><au>WILLIAMS, C</au><au>JOHNSON, P.H</au><au>LARKMAN, M</au><au>SILCOCK, R.M</au><au>LONG, S.A</au><au>RUSSELL, R.C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>lethal ovitrap-based mass trapping scheme for dengue control in Australia: I. Public acceptability and performance of lethal ovitraps</atitle><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><date>2009-12</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>295-302</pages><issn>0269-283X</issn><eissn>1365-2915</eissn><abstract>We report on the first field evaluation of the public acceptability and performance of two types of lethal ovitrap (LO) in three separate trials in Cairns, Australia. Health workers were able to set standard lethal ovitraps (SLOs) in 75 and 71% of premise yards in the wet and dry season, respectively, and biodegradable lethal ovitraps (BLOs) in 93% of yards. Public acceptance, measured as retention of traps by residents, was high for both trap types, with <9% of traps missing after 4 weeks. Traps retaining water after 4 weeks were 78 and 34% for the two SLO trials and 58% for the BLOs. The 'failure rate' in the 535 BLOs set in the field for 4 weeks was 47%, of which 19% were lost, 51% had holes from probable insect chewing, 23% were knocked over, 7% had dried by evaporation and 1% were split. There was no significant difference in the failure rate of BLOs set on porous (grass, soil and mulch) versus solid (tiles, concrete, wood and stone) substrates. The SLOs and the BLOs were readily acceptable to ovipositing Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae); the mean number of eggs/trap was 6 and 15, for the dry season and wet season SLO trial, respectively, and 15 for the BLO wet season trial. Indeed, 84-94% of premise yards had egg positive SLOs or BLOs. A high percentage of both wet and dry season SLOs (29 and 70%, respectively) and BLOs (62%) that were dry after 4 weeks were egg positive, indicating the traps had functioned. Lethal strips from SLOs and BLOs that had been exposed for 4 weeks killed 83 and 74%, respectively, of gravid Ae. aegypti in laboratory assays. These results indicate that mass trapping schemes using SLOs and BLOs are not rejected by the public and effectively target gravid Ae. aegypti. The impact of the interventions on mosquito populations is described in a companion paper.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19941595</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00833.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0269-283X |
| ispartof | Medical and veterinary entomology, 2009-12, Vol.23 (4), p.295-302 |
| issn | 0269-283X 1365-2915 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734158652 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
| subjects | Aedes - virology Aedes aegypti Animals Australia biodegradable lethal ovitrap biodegradable ovitraps biodegradable products dengue Dengue - prevention & control Dengue - transmission Dengue - virology Dengue Virus - growth & development dry season equipment design equipment performance Female Humans insect vectors Insect Vectors - virology lethal ovitrap Lure and Kill lure and kill traps mass trapping mortality mosquito control Mosquito Control - methods Mosquito Control - standards Oviposition ovitraps Public Health public opinion Queensland Seasons trapping vector control wet season |
| title | lethal ovitrap-based mass trapping scheme for dengue control in Australia: I. Public acceptability and performance of lethal ovitraps |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A20%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=lethal%20ovitrap-based%20mass%20trapping%20scheme%20for%20dengue%20control%20in%20Australia:%20I.%20Public%20acceptability%20and%20performance%20of%20lethal%20ovitraps&rft.jtitle=Medical%20and%20veterinary%20entomology&rft.au=RITCHIE,%20S.A&rft.date=2009-12&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=295-302&rft.issn=0269-283X&rft.eissn=1365-2915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00833.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734158652%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5453-13677c8acc8cb12c0c66761edaf8b80c414f2aba3024294a0aa3457d1b0a2b153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734158652&rft_id=info:pmid/19941595&rfr_iscdi=true |