Loading…
The geography of patient safety: A topical analysis of sterility
Many studies on patient safety are geared towards prevention of adverse events by eliminating causes of error. In this article, I argue that patient safety research needs to widen its analytical scope and include causes of strength as well. This change of focus enables me to ask other questions, lik...
Saved in:
Published in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2009-12, Vol.69 (12), p.1705-1712 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-e506f88e3e7750c38694b78076e7d925a1239cba30bab66485572e6e74a15aac3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-e506f88e3e7750c38694b78076e7d925a1239cba30bab66485572e6e74a15aac3 |
container_end_page | 1712 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1705 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Mesman, Jessica |
description | Many studies on patient safety are geared towards prevention of adverse events by eliminating causes of error. In this article, I argue that patient safety research needs to widen its analytical scope and include causes of strength as well. This change of focus enables me to ask other questions, like why don't things go wrong more often? Or, what is the significance of time and space for patient safety? The focal point of this article is on the spatial dimension of patient safety. To gain insight into the ‘geography’ of patient safety and perform a topical analysis, I will focus on one specific kind of space (sterile space), one specific medical procedure (insertion of an intravenous line) and one specific medical ward (neonatology). Based on ethnographic data from research in the Netherlands, I demonstrate how spatial arrangements produce sterility and how sterility work produces spatial orders at the same time. Detailed analysis shows how a sterile line insertion involves the convergence of spatially distributed resources, relocations of the field of activity, an assemblage of an infrastructure of attention, a specific compositional order of materials, and the scaling down of one's degree of mobility. Sterility, I will argue, turns out to be a product of spatial orderings. Simultaneously, sterility work generates particular spatial orders, like open and restricted areas, by producing buffers and boundaries. However, the spatial order of sterility intersects with the spatial order of other lines of activity. Insight into the normative structure of these co-existing spatial orders turns out to be crucial for patient safety. By analyzing processes of spatial fine-tuning in everyday practice, it becomes possible to identify spatial competences and circumstances that enable staff members to provide safe health care. As such, a topical analysis offers an alternative perspective of patient safety, one that takes into account its spatial dimension. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.055 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734162128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953609006595</els_id><sourcerecordid>734162128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-e506f88e3e7750c38694b78076e7d925a1239cba30bab66485572e6e74a15aac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhi0EomnhL8CKAz1t8Mf6ixNRxZdUxKWcLa8z2zjaxIvtVNp_j02iHDgQaWZsy887euUxQm8JXhJMxIftMgWXnN_Bekkx1ssanD9DC6Ikaznr5HO0wFTKVnMmrtB1SluMMcGKvURXRCsuNVEL9OlhA80jhMdop83chKGZbPawz02yA-T5Y7Nqcpi8s2Nj93ack0-VShmiH32eX6EXgx0TvD6tN-jXl88Pd9_a-59fv9-t7lsnsM4tcCwGpYCBlBw7poTueqmwFCDXmnJLKNOutwz3theiU5xLCuWys4Rb69gNuj32nWL4fYCUzc4nB-No9xAOyUjWEUEJVYV8_19SEFY8lHoRxIwyrtlFkEnKKVG0gO_-AbfhEMuzJUMZ7qTUovqTR8jFkFKEwUzR72ycDcGmTtdszXm6pk7X1OC8KH8clREmcGcZABS-wk-GWaFLmUv-VTLrSxJaylQ3EnNDZDlv8q70e3Oye-ir_Ozj9D0KsDoCUCb75CGa4gr2DtY-gstmHfxF038Axq_Rbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230477968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The geography of patient safety: A topical analysis of sterility</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Mesman, Jessica</creator><creatorcontrib>Mesman, Jessica</creatorcontrib><description>Many studies on patient safety are geared towards prevention of adverse events by eliminating causes of error. In this article, I argue that patient safety research needs to widen its analytical scope and include causes of strength as well. This change of focus enables me to ask other questions, like why don't things go wrong more often? Or, what is the significance of time and space for patient safety? The focal point of this article is on the spatial dimension of patient safety. To gain insight into the ‘geography’ of patient safety and perform a topical analysis, I will focus on one specific kind of space (sterile space), one specific medical procedure (insertion of an intravenous line) and one specific medical ward (neonatology). Based on ethnographic data from research in the Netherlands, I demonstrate how spatial arrangements produce sterility and how sterility work produces spatial orders at the same time. Detailed analysis shows how a sterile line insertion involves the convergence of spatially distributed resources, relocations of the field of activity, an assemblage of an infrastructure of attention, a specific compositional order of materials, and the scaling down of one's degree of mobility. Sterility, I will argue, turns out to be a product of spatial orderings. Simultaneously, sterility work generates particular spatial orders, like open and restricted areas, by producing buffers and boundaries. However, the spatial order of sterility intersects with the spatial order of other lines of activity. Insight into the normative structure of these co-existing spatial orders turns out to be crucial for patient safety. By analyzing processes of spatial fine-tuning in everyday practice, it becomes possible to identify spatial competences and circumstances that enable staff members to provide safe health care. As such, a topical analysis offers an alternative perspective of patient safety, one that takes into account its spatial dimension.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19857918</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSCMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Catheterization, Peripheral ; Geography ; Health care ; Health Facility Size ; Hospital Design and Construction ; Human geography ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infection Control - methods ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - organization & administration ; Intensive Care, Neonatal ; Medical boundaries ; Neonatal care ; Neonatology ; Netherlands ; Netherlands Patient safety Neonatology Space Sterility Geography Medical boundaries ; Patient safety ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Public health ; Reproductive health ; Reproductive sterilization ; Safety ; Safety Management ; Space ; Sterility ; Sterilization - methods</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2009-12, Vol.69 (12), p.1705-1712</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Dec 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-e506f88e3e7750c38694b78076e7d925a1239cba30bab66485572e6e74a15aac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-e506f88e3e7750c38694b78076e7d925a1239cba30bab66485572e6e74a15aac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224,33774,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19857918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeesocmed/v_3a69_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a12_3ap_3a1705-1712.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mesman, Jessica</creatorcontrib><title>The geography of patient safety: A topical analysis of sterility</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>Many studies on patient safety are geared towards prevention of adverse events by eliminating causes of error. In this article, I argue that patient safety research needs to widen its analytical scope and include causes of strength as well. This change of focus enables me to ask other questions, like why don't things go wrong more often? Or, what is the significance of time and space for patient safety? The focal point of this article is on the spatial dimension of patient safety. To gain insight into the ‘geography’ of patient safety and perform a topical analysis, I will focus on one specific kind of space (sterile space), one specific medical procedure (insertion of an intravenous line) and one specific medical ward (neonatology). Based on ethnographic data from research in the Netherlands, I demonstrate how spatial arrangements produce sterility and how sterility work produces spatial orders at the same time. Detailed analysis shows how a sterile line insertion involves the convergence of spatially distributed resources, relocations of the field of activity, an assemblage of an infrastructure of attention, a specific compositional order of materials, and the scaling down of one's degree of mobility. Sterility, I will argue, turns out to be a product of spatial orderings. Simultaneously, sterility work generates particular spatial orders, like open and restricted areas, by producing buffers and boundaries. However, the spatial order of sterility intersects with the spatial order of other lines of activity. Insight into the normative structure of these co-existing spatial orders turns out to be crucial for patient safety. By analyzing processes of spatial fine-tuning in everyday practice, it becomes possible to identify spatial competences and circumstances that enable staff members to provide safe health care. As such, a topical analysis offers an alternative perspective of patient safety, one that takes into account its spatial dimension.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Facility Size</subject><subject>Hospital Design and Construction</subject><subject>Human geography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - organization & administration</subject><subject>Intensive Care, Neonatal</subject><subject>Medical boundaries</subject><subject>Neonatal care</subject><subject>Neonatology</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Netherlands Patient safety Neonatology Space Sterility Geography Medical boundaries</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Reproductive sterilization</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety Management</subject><subject>Space</subject><subject>Sterility</subject><subject>Sterilization - methods</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhi0EomnhL8CKAz1t8Mf6ixNRxZdUxKWcLa8z2zjaxIvtVNp_j02iHDgQaWZsy887euUxQm8JXhJMxIftMgWXnN_Bekkx1ssanD9DC6Ikaznr5HO0wFTKVnMmrtB1SluMMcGKvURXRCsuNVEL9OlhA80jhMdop83chKGZbPawz02yA-T5Y7Nqcpi8s2Nj93ack0-VShmiH32eX6EXgx0TvD6tN-jXl88Pd9_a-59fv9-t7lsnsM4tcCwGpYCBlBw7poTueqmwFCDXmnJLKNOutwz3theiU5xLCuWys4Rb69gNuj32nWL4fYCUzc4nB-No9xAOyUjWEUEJVYV8_19SEFY8lHoRxIwyrtlFkEnKKVG0gO_-AbfhEMuzJUMZ7qTUovqTR8jFkFKEwUzR72ycDcGmTtdszXm6pk7X1OC8KH8clREmcGcZABS-wk-GWaFLmUv-VTLrSxJaylQ3EnNDZDlv8q70e3Oye-ir_Ozj9D0KsDoCUCb75CGa4gr2DtY-gstmHfxF038Axq_Rbw</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Mesman, Jessica</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>The geography of patient safety: A topical analysis of sterility</title><author>Mesman, Jessica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-e506f88e3e7750c38694b78076e7d925a1239cba30bab66485572e6e74a15aac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Facility Size</topic><topic>Hospital Design and Construction</topic><topic>Human geography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - organization & administration</topic><topic>Intensive Care, Neonatal</topic><topic>Medical boundaries</topic><topic>Neonatal care</topic><topic>Neonatology</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Netherlands Patient safety Neonatology Space Sterility Geography Medical boundaries</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Reproductive sterilization</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety Management</topic><topic>Space</topic><topic>Sterility</topic><topic>Sterilization - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mesman, Jessica</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mesman, Jessica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The geography of patient safety: A topical analysis of sterility</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1705</spage><epage>1712</epage><pages>1705-1712</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSCMAW</coden><abstract>Many studies on patient safety are geared towards prevention of adverse events by eliminating causes of error. In this article, I argue that patient safety research needs to widen its analytical scope and include causes of strength as well. This change of focus enables me to ask other questions, like why don't things go wrong more often? Or, what is the significance of time and space for patient safety? The focal point of this article is on the spatial dimension of patient safety. To gain insight into the ‘geography’ of patient safety and perform a topical analysis, I will focus on one specific kind of space (sterile space), one specific medical procedure (insertion of an intravenous line) and one specific medical ward (neonatology). Based on ethnographic data from research in the Netherlands, I demonstrate how spatial arrangements produce sterility and how sterility work produces spatial orders at the same time. Detailed analysis shows how a sterile line insertion involves the convergence of spatially distributed resources, relocations of the field of activity, an assemblage of an infrastructure of attention, a specific compositional order of materials, and the scaling down of one's degree of mobility. Sterility, I will argue, turns out to be a product of spatial orderings. Simultaneously, sterility work generates particular spatial orders, like open and restricted areas, by producing buffers and boundaries. However, the spatial order of sterility intersects with the spatial order of other lines of activity. Insight into the normative structure of these co-existing spatial orders turns out to be crucial for patient safety. By analyzing processes of spatial fine-tuning in everyday practice, it becomes possible to identify spatial competences and circumstances that enable staff members to provide safe health care. As such, a topical analysis offers an alternative perspective of patient safety, one that takes into account its spatial dimension.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19857918</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.055</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2009-12, Vol.69 (12), p.1705-1712 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734162128 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Analysis Catheterization, Peripheral Geography Health care Health Facility Size Hospital Design and Construction Human geography Humans Infant, Newborn Infection Control - methods Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - organization & administration Intensive Care, Neonatal Medical boundaries Neonatal care Neonatology Netherlands Netherlands Patient safety Neonatology Space Sterility Geography Medical boundaries Patient safety Patients Pediatrics Public health Reproductive health Reproductive sterilization Safety Safety Management Space Sterility Sterilization - methods |
title | The geography of patient safety: A topical analysis of sterility |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T03%3A01%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20geography%20of%20patient%20safety:%20A%20topical%20analysis%20of%20sterility&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Mesman,%20Jessica&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1705&rft.epage=1712&rft.pages=1705-1712&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSCMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734162128%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-e506f88e3e7750c38694b78076e7d925a1239cba30bab66485572e6e74a15aac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230477968&rft_id=info:pmid/19857918&rfr_iscdi=true |