Loading…

Revisiting the Blind Tests in Crystal Structure Prediction: Accurate Energy Ranking of Molecular Crystals

In the 2007 blind test of crystal structure prediction hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), a hybrid DFT/MM method correctly ranked each of the four experimental structures as having the lowest lattice energy of all the crystal structures predicted for each molecule. The work...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of physical chemistry. B 2009-12, Vol.113 (51), p.16303-16313
Main Authors: Asmadi, Aldi, Neumann, Marcus A, Kendrick, John, Girard, Pascale, Perrin, Marc-Antoine, Leusen, Frank J. J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-6d6b86be84ad3d1ee5f624fd76a74ef9903ebf6e0cc340dde38f5284d96b88103
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-6d6b86be84ad3d1ee5f624fd76a74ef9903ebf6e0cc340dde38f5284d96b88103
container_end_page 16313
container_issue 51
container_start_page 16303
container_title The journal of physical chemistry. B
container_volume 113
creator Asmadi, Aldi
Neumann, Marcus A
Kendrick, John
Girard, Pascale
Perrin, Marc-Antoine
Leusen, Frank J. J
description In the 2007 blind test of crystal structure prediction hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), a hybrid DFT/MM method correctly ranked each of the four experimental structures as having the lowest lattice energy of all the crystal structures predicted for each molecule. The work presented here further validates this hybrid method by optimizing the crystal structures (experimental and submitted) of the first three CCDC blind tests held in 1999, 2001, and 2004. Except for the crystal structures of compound IX, all structures were reminimized and ranked according to their lattice energies. The hybrid method computes the lattice energy of a crystal structure as the sum of the DFT total energy and a van der Waals (dispersion) energy correction. Considering all four blind tests, the crystal structure with the lowest lattice energy corresponds to the experimentally observed structure for 12 out of 14 molecules. Moreover, good geometrical agreement is observed between the structures determined by the hybrid method and those measured experimentally. In comparison with the correct submissions made by the blind test participants, all hybrid optimized crystal structures (apart from compound II) have the smallest calculated root mean squared deviations from the experimentally observed structures. It is predicted that a new polymorph of compound V exists under pressure.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/jp906971h
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734200029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734200029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-6d6b86be84ad3d1ee5f624fd76a74ef9903ebf6e0cc340dde38f5284d96b88103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EolBY8APIG4RYBOwkdWJ2pSoPqQhUyjpy7EnrkibFD6T-Pa4aYMNiNLM4c6R7ETqj5JqSmN4s15wwntHFHjqig5hEYbL97maUsB46tnZJSDyIc3aIepTzAeEkO0J6Cl_aaqebOXYLwHe1bhSegXUW6waPzMY6UeM3Z7x03gB-NaC0dLptbvFQSm-EAzxuwMw3eCqaj62orfBzW4P0tTA_CnuCDqqw4LTbffR-P56NHqPJy8PTaDiJREJTFzHFypyVkKdCJYoCDCoWp5XKmMhSqDgnCZQVAyJlkhKlIMmrkCpVPPzllCR9dLnzrk376UOQYqWthLoWDbTeFlmSxiRUwQN5tSOlaa01UBVro1fCbApKim2xxW-xgT3vrL5cgfojuyYDcLEDhLTFsvWmCSH_EX0D4OmAng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734200029</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting the Blind Tests in Crystal Structure Prediction: Accurate Energy Ranking of Molecular Crystals</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Asmadi, Aldi ; Neumann, Marcus A ; Kendrick, John ; Girard, Pascale ; Perrin, Marc-Antoine ; Leusen, Frank J. J</creator><creatorcontrib>Asmadi, Aldi ; Neumann, Marcus A ; Kendrick, John ; Girard, Pascale ; Perrin, Marc-Antoine ; Leusen, Frank J. J</creatorcontrib><description>In the 2007 blind test of crystal structure prediction hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), a hybrid DFT/MM method correctly ranked each of the four experimental structures as having the lowest lattice energy of all the crystal structures predicted for each molecule. The work presented here further validates this hybrid method by optimizing the crystal structures (experimental and submitted) of the first three CCDC blind tests held in 1999, 2001, and 2004. Except for the crystal structures of compound IX, all structures were reminimized and ranked according to their lattice energies. The hybrid method computes the lattice energy of a crystal structure as the sum of the DFT total energy and a van der Waals (dispersion) energy correction. Considering all four blind tests, the crystal structure with the lowest lattice energy corresponds to the experimentally observed structure for 12 out of 14 molecules. Moreover, good geometrical agreement is observed between the structures determined by the hybrid method and those measured experimentally. In comparison with the correct submissions made by the blind test participants, all hybrid optimized crystal structures (apart from compound II) have the smallest calculated root mean squared deviations from the experimentally observed structures. It is predicted that a new polymorph of compound V exists under pressure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-6106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jp906971h</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19950907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>B: Macromolecules, Soft Matter ; Crystallography, X-Ray ; Models, Chemical ; Models, Molecular ; Molecular Conformation ; Software ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2009-12, Vol.113 (51), p.16303-16313</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-6d6b86be84ad3d1ee5f624fd76a74ef9903ebf6e0cc340dde38f5284d96b88103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-6d6b86be84ad3d1ee5f624fd76a74ef9903ebf6e0cc340dde38f5284d96b88103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19950907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asmadi, Aldi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Marcus A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girard, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Marc-Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leusen, Frank J. J</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting the Blind Tests in Crystal Structure Prediction: Accurate Energy Ranking of Molecular Crystals</title><title>The journal of physical chemistry. B</title><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. B</addtitle><description>In the 2007 blind test of crystal structure prediction hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), a hybrid DFT/MM method correctly ranked each of the four experimental structures as having the lowest lattice energy of all the crystal structures predicted for each molecule. The work presented here further validates this hybrid method by optimizing the crystal structures (experimental and submitted) of the first three CCDC blind tests held in 1999, 2001, and 2004. Except for the crystal structures of compound IX, all structures were reminimized and ranked according to their lattice energies. The hybrid method computes the lattice energy of a crystal structure as the sum of the DFT total energy and a van der Waals (dispersion) energy correction. Considering all four blind tests, the crystal structure with the lowest lattice energy corresponds to the experimentally observed structure for 12 out of 14 molecules. Moreover, good geometrical agreement is observed between the structures determined by the hybrid method and those measured experimentally. In comparison with the correct submissions made by the blind test participants, all hybrid optimized crystal structures (apart from compound II) have the smallest calculated root mean squared deviations from the experimentally observed structures. It is predicted that a new polymorph of compound V exists under pressure.</description><subject>B: Macromolecules, Soft Matter</subject><subject>Crystallography, X-Ray</subject><subject>Models, Chemical</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>Molecular Conformation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>1520-6106</issn><issn>1520-5207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EolBY8APIG4RYBOwkdWJ2pSoPqQhUyjpy7EnrkibFD6T-Pa4aYMNiNLM4c6R7ETqj5JqSmN4s15wwntHFHjqig5hEYbL97maUsB46tnZJSDyIc3aIepTzAeEkO0J6Cl_aaqebOXYLwHe1bhSegXUW6waPzMY6UeM3Z7x03gB-NaC0dLptbvFQSm-EAzxuwMw3eCqaj62orfBzW4P0tTA_CnuCDqqw4LTbffR-P56NHqPJy8PTaDiJREJTFzHFypyVkKdCJYoCDCoWp5XKmMhSqDgnCZQVAyJlkhKlIMmrkCpVPPzllCR9dLnzrk376UOQYqWthLoWDbTeFlmSxiRUwQN5tSOlaa01UBVro1fCbApKim2xxW-xgT3vrL5cgfojuyYDcLEDhLTFsvWmCSH_EX0D4OmAng</recordid><startdate>20091224</startdate><enddate>20091224</enddate><creator>Asmadi, Aldi</creator><creator>Neumann, Marcus A</creator><creator>Kendrick, John</creator><creator>Girard, Pascale</creator><creator>Perrin, Marc-Antoine</creator><creator>Leusen, Frank J. J</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091224</creationdate><title>Revisiting the Blind Tests in Crystal Structure Prediction: Accurate Energy Ranking of Molecular Crystals</title><author>Asmadi, Aldi ; Neumann, Marcus A ; Kendrick, John ; Girard, Pascale ; Perrin, Marc-Antoine ; Leusen, Frank J. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-6d6b86be84ad3d1ee5f624fd76a74ef9903ebf6e0cc340dde38f5284d96b88103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>B: Macromolecules, Soft Matter</topic><topic>Crystallography, X-Ray</topic><topic>Models, Chemical</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>Molecular Conformation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asmadi, Aldi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Marcus A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girard, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Marc-Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leusen, Frank J. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of physical chemistry. B</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asmadi, Aldi</au><au>Neumann, Marcus A</au><au>Kendrick, John</au><au>Girard, Pascale</au><au>Perrin, Marc-Antoine</au><au>Leusen, Frank J. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting the Blind Tests in Crystal Structure Prediction: Accurate Energy Ranking of Molecular Crystals</atitle><jtitle>The journal of physical chemistry. B</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. B</addtitle><date>2009-12-24</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>51</issue><spage>16303</spage><epage>16313</epage><pages>16303-16313</pages><issn>1520-6106</issn><eissn>1520-5207</eissn><abstract>In the 2007 blind test of crystal structure prediction hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), a hybrid DFT/MM method correctly ranked each of the four experimental structures as having the lowest lattice energy of all the crystal structures predicted for each molecule. The work presented here further validates this hybrid method by optimizing the crystal structures (experimental and submitted) of the first three CCDC blind tests held in 1999, 2001, and 2004. Except for the crystal structures of compound IX, all structures were reminimized and ranked according to their lattice energies. The hybrid method computes the lattice energy of a crystal structure as the sum of the DFT total energy and a van der Waals (dispersion) energy correction. Considering all four blind tests, the crystal structure with the lowest lattice energy corresponds to the experimentally observed structure for 12 out of 14 molecules. Moreover, good geometrical agreement is observed between the structures determined by the hybrid method and those measured experimentally. In comparison with the correct submissions made by the blind test participants, all hybrid optimized crystal structures (apart from compound II) have the smallest calculated root mean squared deviations from the experimentally observed structures. It is predicted that a new polymorph of compound V exists under pressure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>19950907</pmid><doi>10.1021/jp906971h</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-6106
ispartof The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2009-12, Vol.113 (51), p.16303-16313
issn 1520-6106
1520-5207
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734200029
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects B: Macromolecules, Soft Matter
Crystallography, X-Ray
Models, Chemical
Models, Molecular
Molecular Conformation
Software
Thermodynamics
title Revisiting the Blind Tests in Crystal Structure Prediction: Accurate Energy Ranking of Molecular Crystals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20the%20Blind%20Tests%20in%20Crystal%20Structure%20Prediction:%20Accurate%20Energy%20Ranking%20of%20Molecular%20Crystals&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20physical%20chemistry.%20B&rft.au=Asmadi,%20Aldi&rft.date=2009-12-24&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=51&rft.spage=16303&rft.epage=16313&rft.pages=16303-16313&rft.issn=1520-6106&rft.eissn=1520-5207&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jp906971h&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734200029%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-6d6b86be84ad3d1ee5f624fd76a74ef9903ebf6e0cc340dde38f5284d96b88103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734200029&rft_id=info:pmid/19950907&rfr_iscdi=true