Loading…

Simplified Method for Quantifying Theoretical Underestimation of Chamber-Based Trace Gas Fluxes

Closed chambers used to measure soil-atmosphere exchange of trace gases including nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) generate errors due to suppression of the gas concentration gradient at the soil-atmosphere interface. A method is described here for estimating the magnitude of flux undere...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental quality 2010-01, Vol.39 (1), p.126-135
Main Author: Venterea, Rodney T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4851-1524d740c290261ea3dd5fbf7ab9fa4c165e7c702c42ded9ef95a5470c335d283
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4851-1524d740c290261ea3dd5fbf7ab9fa4c165e7c702c42ded9ef95a5470c335d283
container_end_page 135
container_issue 1
container_start_page 126
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 39
creator Venterea, Rodney T
description Closed chambers used to measure soil-atmosphere exchange of trace gases including nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) generate errors due to suppression of the gas concentration gradient at the soil-atmosphere interface. A method is described here for estimating the magnitude of flux underestimation arising from chamber deployment. The technique is based on previously established gas transport theory and has been simplified to facilitate application while preserving the fundamental physical relationships. The method avoids the use of nonlinear regression but requires knowledge of soil properties including texture, bulk density, water content, temperature, and pH. Two options are presented: a numerical technique which is easily adapted to spreadsheet application, and a graphical method requiring minimal calculation. In both cases, the magnitude of theoretical flux underestimation (TFU) is determined, taking into account effects of chamber geometry and deployment time, the flux-calculation scheme, and properties of the soil and gas under consideration. Application to actual data and recent studies confirmed that TFU can vary widely within and across sites. The analysis also revealed a highly linear correlation between soil water content and TFU, suggesting that previously observed relationships between water content and trace gas flux may in part reflect artifacts of chamber methodology. The method described here provides a practical means of improving the absolute accuracy of flux estimates and normalizing data obtained using different chamber designs in different soils.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/jeq2009.0231
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734220936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36426859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4851-1524d740c290261ea3dd5fbf7ab9fa4c165e7c702c42ded9ef95a5470c335d283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEURi0EomlhxxpGLMqGKdevcbwsUVtARahqsrYcz3XjaDJO7RlB_j2OEliwKAs_ZJ17bN-PkDcULhjl4tMaHxmAvgDG6TMyoZKrmpXpOZkAiLIXTJ6Q05zXAJSBal6Sk1IgphxgQsx92Gy74AO21XccVrGtfEzV3Wj7Ifhd6B-q-QpjwiE421WLvsWEeQgbO4TYV9FXs5XdLDHVn20ujnmyDqsbm6vrbvyF-RV54W2X8fVxPSOL66v57Et9--Pm6-zytnZiKmlNJROtEuCYBtZQtLxtpV96ZZfaW-FoI1E5BcwJ1mKr0WtppVDgOJctm_Iz8uHg3ab4OJYXmk3IDrvO9hjHbBQXjIHmTSHPnyR5I1gzlfq_YOk-1ULv737_D7iOY-rLdw0XSoIQVBXo4wFyKeac0JttKl1MO0NhrxLmGKTZB1nwt0fnuNxg-xf-k1wB9AH4GTrcPSkz367u2H6Ug6P83aHW22jsQwrZLO4ZUA5UMcYbzX8DTbyxoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>347504417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simplified Method for Quantifying Theoretical Underestimation of Chamber-Based Trace Gas Fluxes</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Venterea, Rodney T</creator><creatorcontrib>Venterea, Rodney T</creatorcontrib><description>Closed chambers used to measure soil-atmosphere exchange of trace gases including nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) generate errors due to suppression of the gas concentration gradient at the soil-atmosphere interface. A method is described here for estimating the magnitude of flux underestimation arising from chamber deployment. The technique is based on previously established gas transport theory and has been simplified to facilitate application while preserving the fundamental physical relationships. The method avoids the use of nonlinear regression but requires knowledge of soil properties including texture, bulk density, water content, temperature, and pH. Two options are presented: a numerical technique which is easily adapted to spreadsheet application, and a graphical method requiring minimal calculation. In both cases, the magnitude of theoretical flux underestimation (TFU) is determined, taking into account effects of chamber geometry and deployment time, the flux-calculation scheme, and properties of the soil and gas under consideration. Application to actual data and recent studies confirmed that TFU can vary widely within and across sites. The analysis also revealed a highly linear correlation between soil water content and TFU, suggesting that previously observed relationships between water content and trace gas flux may in part reflect artifacts of chamber methodology. The method described here provides a practical means of improving the absolute accuracy of flux estimates and normalizing data obtained using different chamber designs in different soils.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2009.0231</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20048300</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</publisher><subject>accuracy ; Air Pollutants - chemistry ; Atmosphere ; Atmosphere - chemistry ; bulk density ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Dioxide - chemistry ; data analysis ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; estimation ; experimental design ; Fluctuations ; gas emissions ; mathematical models ; measuring devices ; Models, Chemical ; Moisture content ; Nitrous oxide ; Nitrous Oxide - chemistry ; Physical properties ; Soil - analysis ; soil density ; soil pH ; Soil Pollutants - chemistry ; Soil properties ; soil temperature ; soil texture ; soil transport processes ; Soil water ; soil water content ; soil-atmosphere interactions ; Soils ; spatial variation ; Theory ; uncertainty ; Water content</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2010-01, Vol.39 (1), p.126-135</ispartof><rights>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4851-1524d740c290261ea3dd5fbf7ab9fa4c165e7c702c42ded9ef95a5470c335d283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4851-1524d740c290261ea3dd5fbf7ab9fa4c165e7c702c42ded9ef95a5470c335d283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20048300$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Venterea, Rodney T</creatorcontrib><title>Simplified Method for Quantifying Theoretical Underestimation of Chamber-Based Trace Gas Fluxes</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Closed chambers used to measure soil-atmosphere exchange of trace gases including nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) generate errors due to suppression of the gas concentration gradient at the soil-atmosphere interface. A method is described here for estimating the magnitude of flux underestimation arising from chamber deployment. The technique is based on previously established gas transport theory and has been simplified to facilitate application while preserving the fundamental physical relationships. The method avoids the use of nonlinear regression but requires knowledge of soil properties including texture, bulk density, water content, temperature, and pH. Two options are presented: a numerical technique which is easily adapted to spreadsheet application, and a graphical method requiring minimal calculation. In both cases, the magnitude of theoretical flux underestimation (TFU) is determined, taking into account effects of chamber geometry and deployment time, the flux-calculation scheme, and properties of the soil and gas under consideration. Application to actual data and recent studies confirmed that TFU can vary widely within and across sites. The analysis also revealed a highly linear correlation between soil water content and TFU, suggesting that previously observed relationships between water content and trace gas flux may in part reflect artifacts of chamber methodology. The method described here provides a practical means of improving the absolute accuracy of flux estimates and normalizing data obtained using different chamber designs in different soils.</description><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>Air Pollutants - chemistry</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Atmosphere - chemistry</subject><subject>bulk density</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - chemistry</subject><subject>data analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>estimation</subject><subject>experimental design</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>gas emissions</subject><subject>mathematical models</subject><subject>measuring devices</subject><subject>Models, Chemical</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Nitrous Oxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Soil - analysis</subject><subject>soil density</subject><subject>soil pH</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - chemistry</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>soil temperature</subject><subject>soil texture</subject><subject>soil transport processes</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>soil water content</subject><subject>soil-atmosphere interactions</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>spatial variation</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEURi0EomlhxxpGLMqGKdevcbwsUVtARahqsrYcz3XjaDJO7RlB_j2OEliwKAs_ZJ17bN-PkDcULhjl4tMaHxmAvgDG6TMyoZKrmpXpOZkAiLIXTJ6Q05zXAJSBal6Sk1IgphxgQsx92Gy74AO21XccVrGtfEzV3Wj7Ifhd6B-q-QpjwiE421WLvsWEeQgbO4TYV9FXs5XdLDHVn20ujnmyDqsbm6vrbvyF-RV54W2X8fVxPSOL66v57Et9--Pm6-zytnZiKmlNJROtEuCYBtZQtLxtpV96ZZfaW-FoI1E5BcwJ1mKr0WtppVDgOJctm_Iz8uHg3ab4OJYXmk3IDrvO9hjHbBQXjIHmTSHPnyR5I1gzlfq_YOk-1ULv737_D7iOY-rLdw0XSoIQVBXo4wFyKeac0JttKl1MO0NhrxLmGKTZB1nwt0fnuNxg-xf-k1wB9AH4GTrcPSkz367u2H6Ug6P83aHW22jsQwrZLO4ZUA5UMcYbzX8DTbyxoQ</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Venterea, Rodney T</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Simplified Method for Quantifying Theoretical Underestimation of Chamber-Based Trace Gas Fluxes</title><author>Venterea, Rodney T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4851-1524d740c290261ea3dd5fbf7ab9fa4c165e7c702c42ded9ef95a5470c335d283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>Air Pollutants - chemistry</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Atmosphere - chemistry</topic><topic>bulk density</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - chemistry</topic><topic>data analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>estimation</topic><topic>experimental design</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>gas emissions</topic><topic>mathematical models</topic><topic>measuring devices</topic><topic>Models, Chemical</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Nitrous Oxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Soil - analysis</topic><topic>soil density</topic><topic>soil pH</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - chemistry</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>soil temperature</topic><topic>soil texture</topic><topic>soil transport processes</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>soil water content</topic><topic>soil-atmosphere interactions</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>spatial variation</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Venterea, Rodney T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Venterea, Rodney T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simplified Method for Quantifying Theoretical Underestimation of Chamber-Based Trace Gas Fluxes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>126-135</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Closed chambers used to measure soil-atmosphere exchange of trace gases including nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) generate errors due to suppression of the gas concentration gradient at the soil-atmosphere interface. A method is described here for estimating the magnitude of flux underestimation arising from chamber deployment. The technique is based on previously established gas transport theory and has been simplified to facilitate application while preserving the fundamental physical relationships. The method avoids the use of nonlinear regression but requires knowledge of soil properties including texture, bulk density, water content, temperature, and pH. Two options are presented: a numerical technique which is easily adapted to spreadsheet application, and a graphical method requiring minimal calculation. In both cases, the magnitude of theoretical flux underestimation (TFU) is determined, taking into account effects of chamber geometry and deployment time, the flux-calculation scheme, and properties of the soil and gas under consideration. Application to actual data and recent studies confirmed that TFU can vary widely within and across sites. The analysis also revealed a highly linear correlation between soil water content and TFU, suggesting that previously observed relationships between water content and trace gas flux may in part reflect artifacts of chamber methodology. The method described here provides a practical means of improving the absolute accuracy of flux estimates and normalizing data obtained using different chamber designs in different soils.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</pub><pmid>20048300</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2009.0231</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2010-01, Vol.39 (1), p.126-135
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734220936
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects accuracy
Air Pollutants - chemistry
Atmosphere
Atmosphere - chemistry
bulk density
Carbon dioxide
Carbon Dioxide - chemistry
data analysis
Environmental Monitoring - methods
estimation
experimental design
Fluctuations
gas emissions
mathematical models
measuring devices
Models, Chemical
Moisture content
Nitrous oxide
Nitrous Oxide - chemistry
Physical properties
Soil - analysis
soil density
soil pH
Soil Pollutants - chemistry
Soil properties
soil temperature
soil texture
soil transport processes
Soil water
soil water content
soil-atmosphere interactions
Soils
spatial variation
Theory
uncertainty
Water content
title Simplified Method for Quantifying Theoretical Underestimation of Chamber-Based Trace Gas Fluxes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A56%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simplified%20Method%20for%20Quantifying%20Theoretical%20Underestimation%20of%20Chamber-Based%20Trace%20Gas%20Fluxes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Venterea,%20Rodney%20T&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=126-135&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2009.0231&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36426859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4851-1524d740c290261ea3dd5fbf7ab9fa4c165e7c702c42ded9ef95a5470c335d283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=347504417&rft_id=info:pmid/20048300&rfr_iscdi=true